MONTREAL - Mark Lafleur, the troubled son of hockey legend Guy Lafleur, has been arrested for the second time in six months for violating a court order not to frequent bars.
As you will see, I didn't edit the post, I just wrote it. And what I'm saying is that if his excuse is that he can't help himself, he needs to be locked up and treated until he can. I've always been rightwing in that regard.
"andyt" said As you will see, I didn't edit the post, I just wrote it. And what I'm saying is that if his excuse is that he can't help himself, he needs to be locked up and treated until he can. I've always been rightwing in that regard.
What was the expression I threw from nowhere?
I've got to call Bullshit on that andy, your first response was...."No reason to skate, as I said." A minute later you edited your post by adding...."Or, if they're severe enough he can't help himself, lock him up for the safety of the community."
Lock him up for a while, he just doesn't get it.
"In 2009 Lafleur was sentenced to 15 months to be served in the community, with probation for three years, following an attack on his ex-girlfriend.
He had pleaded guilty to 14 charges including assault, battery, unlawful confinement and uttering death threats against the young woman."
No reason for him to skate (heh, heh). Just like he did here:
"In 2009 Lafleur was sentenced to 15 months to be served in the community, with probation for three years, following an attack on his ex-girlfriend.
He had pleaded guilty to 14 charges including assault, battery, unlawful confinement and uttering death threats against the young woman."
Psychiatric issues are no reason for crimes ?
But I see that you edited your post by adding "he can't help himself, lock him up for the safety of the community". When did you turn rightwing ?
What was the expression I threw from nowhere?
Mark Lafleur has psychiatric issues by the way.
The alcohol and illegal drugs probably don't help, either.
Maybe if he cleaned up his act, the "problems" might not be so severe.
As you will see, I didn't edit the post, I just wrote it. And what I'm saying is that if his excuse is that he can't help himself, he needs to be locked up and treated until he can. I've always been rightwing in that regard.
What was the expression I threw from nowhere?
I've got to call Bullshit on that andy, your first response was...."No reason to skate, as I said." A minute later you edited your post by adding...."Or, if they're severe enough he can't help himself, lock him up for the safety of the community."