The motion in question states that "a new Liberal government will legalize marijuana and ensure the regulation and taxation of its production, distribution, and use, while enacting strict penalties for illegal trafficking, illegal importation and exportation, and impaired driving."
I'm curious to see how they plan to enforce impaired driving.... How do you prove someone is impaired..
The motion in question states that "a new Liberal government will legalize marijuana and ensure the regulation and taxation of its production, distribution, and use, while enacting strict penalties for illegal trafficking, illegal importation and exportation, and impaired driving."
I'm curious to see how they plan to enforce impaired driving.... How do you prove someone is impaired..
"OnTheIce" said It's a good plan politically to hit some notes with the young crowd.
Hey OTI, your ignorance is showing Turns out the two largest imbibing groups are young people and those 50 and OVER!! Yep, turns out a lot of over 50s used to smoke weed but gave it up for the responsibilities of raising families. Now that their responsibility in that regard is finished and they no longer have big bills to cover, they can go back to enjoying a bit of what mother nature provides.
I'm curious to see how they plan to enforce impaired driving.... How do you prove someone is impaired..
Your question implies there's a huge mass of law abiding people out there who would love to smoke weed and would go whole hog on it the minute it's legalized. But, they're not so law abiding that they would refrain from driving stoned. Pretty silly proposition, you've got to admit.
If we really cared about impaired driving, we'd ban alcohol.
"PublicAnimalNo9" said It's a good plan politically to hit some notes with the young crowd.
Hey OTI, your ignorance is showing Turns out the two largest imbibing groups are young people and those 50 and OVER!! Yep, turns out a lot of over 50s used to smoke weed but gave it up for the responsibilities of raising families. Now that their responsibility in that regard is finished and they no longer have big bills to cover, they can go back to enjoying a bit of what mother nature provides.
Yet the 50+ group won't vote for a party for that sole reason where young people just might.
"OnTheIce" said It's a good plan politically to hit some notes with the young crowd.
Hey OTI, your ignorance is showing Turns out the two largest imbibing groups are young people and those 50 and OVER!! Yep, turns out a lot of over 50s used to smoke weed but gave it up for the responsibilities of raising families. Now that their responsibility in that regard is finished and they no longer have big bills to cover, they can go back to enjoying a bit of what mother nature provides.
Yet the 50+ group won't vote for a party for that sole reason where young people just might. Yeah, yer right. Didn't quite see the point you were making intially.
I'm curious to see how they plan to enforce impaired driving.... How do you prove someone is impaired..
-J.
Their desperation to be relevant again is staggering.
-J.
The really new Dippers.
It's like the Leafs, and .....
It won't help.
I'm curious to see how they plan to enforce impaired driving.... How do you prove someone is impaired..
You take a whiff
I'm curious to see how they plan to enforce impaired driving.... How do you prove someone is impaired..
Ask them if they have the munchies.
I'm curious to see how they plan to enforce impaired driving.... How do you prove someone is impaired..
Ask them if they have the munchies.
Just wave a bag of Doritos by the driver-side window.
It's a good plan politically to hit some notes with the young crowd.
Hey OTI, your ignorance is showing
Yep, turns out a lot of over 50s used to smoke weed but gave it up for the responsibilities of raising families. Now that their responsibility in that regard is finished and they no longer have big bills to cover, they can go back to enjoying a bit of what mother nature provides.
I'm curious to see how they plan to enforce impaired driving.... How do you prove someone is impaired..
Your question implies there's a huge mass of law abiding people out there who would love to smoke weed and would go whole hog on it the minute it's legalized. But, they're not so law abiding that they would refrain from driving stoned. Pretty silly proposition, you've got to admit.
If we really cared about impaired driving, we'd ban alcohol.
It's a good plan politically to hit some notes with the young crowd.
Hey OTI, your ignorance is showing
Yep, turns out a lot of over 50s used to smoke weed but gave it up for the responsibilities of raising families. Now that their responsibility in that regard is finished and they no longer have big bills to cover, they can go back to enjoying a bit of what mother nature provides.
Yet the 50+ group won't vote for a party for that sole reason where young people just might.
It's a good plan politically to hit some notes with the young crowd.
Hey OTI, your ignorance is showing
Yep, turns out a lot of over 50s used to smoke weed but gave it up for the responsibilities of raising families. Now that their responsibility in that regard is finished and they no longer have big bills to cover, they can go back to enjoying a bit of what mother nature provides.
Yet the 50+ group won't vote for a party for that sole reason where young people just might.
Yeah, yer right. Didn't quite see the point you were making intially.