Hacker group LulzSec announces it is done after 50 days of 'chaotic thrill'

I guess these guys are the new Anonymous.

So, they were just a little group of anarchists begging for attention. Two were caughed so now it's over. I would like to know the age of them. The two who got caughed were around 18. Typical.

So were they hired by the Rozzers or just found?

Here is an accurate representation of LulzSec's discovery though.

lulz at the oranges.

lol I loved May's 'Bentley'.

People always blame the hackers for looking into open doors, no one blames the people for not locking their doors to begin with.

lol I loved May's 'Bentley'.

People always blame the hackers for looking into open doors, no one blames the people for not locking their doors to begin with.

That's very accurate. In this days and age whit so many of our data and information in the cloud it is imperative that corporation like Facebook, Google, MSN, Sony, etc... be up to date on the security of there network. And just the fact that Lulzsec was so successful should give an indication of what the legislator should impose has regulation for the safe keeping of our information. If you want to use the internet to sell and get paid then you should have a secure network and database!!!

lol I loved May's 'Bentley'.

People always blame the hackers for looking into open doors, no one blames the people for not locking their doors to begin with.

That's very accurate. In this days and age whit so many of our data and information in the cloud it is imperative that corporation like Facebook, Google, MSN, Sony, etc... be up to date on the security of there network. And just the fact that Lulzsec was so successful should give an indication of what the legislator should impose has regulation for the safe keeping of our information. If you want to use the internet to sell and get paid then you should have a secure network and database!!!
The laws are already there. What they did is illegal. We don't need more regulation on companies but more informations to the public. Sony lost a lot of money being down for 3 weeks on their PlayStation plus they were storing private informations in plain text !! They should be accountable for that. But, don't think more legislations will help. It's only putting the problem "under the carpet".

Ahh, I see the cops are catching up to these assholes. Good.

Procu if the law are already there then Why Sony network was even allowed to do business online anywhere????

6000th post BTW

That's very accurate. In this days and age whit so many of our data and information in the cloud it is imperative that corporation like Facebook, Google, MSN, Sony, etc... be up to date on the security of there network. And just the fact that Lulzsec was so successful should give an indication of what the legislator should impose has regulation for the safe keeping of our information. If you want to use the internet to sell and get paid then you should have a secure network and database!!!
The laws are already there. What they did is illegal. We don't need more regulation on companies but more informations to the public. Sony lost a lot of money being down for 3 weeks on their PlayStation plus they were storing private informations in plain text !! They should be accountable for that. But, don't think more legislations will help. It's only putting the problem "under the carpet".

No, the laws are not there. The laws are to punish the people looking in the open doors, not the ones who fail to lock the door. Our information is a valuable commodity these days; to those who want to market to us, or to steal by impersonating us. It's not just Sony, how about the hack on Airmiles, Best Buy, and many other 'rewards' programs? (Did you know Best Buy stores your PIN and Card information when you do a debit transaction? What possible business use is that information? How do they protect it?) They don't protect it, because they are not legally obligated to. So when your identity gets stolen because of their ineptitude, you bear the costs.

The Emperor has no clothes. All LulzSec has done is point that out.

So, LulzSec pointed that the lack of informations about the security in those firms is a problem. In that sense, it's good. It tells the customers that Sony, and others, are not secure.

I don't see why we should regulate the protection of private informations by PRIVATE corporations. If they don't do it, they would be held accountable and they will loose customers. That's how it works.

Which is one of the primary reasons I still use cashola. I don't trust anyone to not use my personal info for their gain on some level.