Mission RCMP were advised just before noon on Sunday that a man serving a life sentence for murder had escaped from the Ferndale Institution on Dewdney Trunk Road.
Can someone tell me what a person serving a life sentence for first degree murder and who is considered dangerous, was doing in a minimum-security prison?
"raydan" said Can someone tell me what a person serving a life sentence for first degree murder and who is considered dangerous, was doing in a minimum-security prison?
Can someone also tell me why the people or committees responsible for that decision should not be held partially accountable for any harm he causes?
"raydan" said Can someone tell me what a person serving a life sentence for first degree murder and who is considered dangerous, was doing in a minimum-security prison?
So the question, what he was doing there is interesting: soft correction prison system which blindly believes that can be grown up again sometimes(often) brokes. Let's imagine that someone is in high lvl security prison, suddenly he calms down. After 3 years he was calm like morning lake water. So they sent him to middle lvl, there he was for example 5 years..... . After that they send him to minimal security . And "boom" - he escapes. Man, you cannot believe but some prisoners are keeping this plan 30-40 years in their brains. The problem is that in first world countries society gives chance to those people more. I'm not against of it, we all can do mistakes and all have a chance to be forgiven. But those who receive this chance must be checked much better, everything should be not more than enought.
"DrCaleb" said Can someone tell me what a person serving a life sentence for first degree murder and who is considered dangerous, was doing in a minimum-security prison?
Can someone also tell me why the people or committees responsible for that decision should not be held partially accountable for any harm he causes? Responsible in that somebody suggest to them they move on to a line of work they are more suited for. I'm sure that con played them like a fiddle, saying all the things they wanted to hear. And he'll be put back in max or medium for a bit, and in 6 months to a year he'll be back in minimum security when he's caught.
Corrections Canada loses another prisoner. Getting to be a trend here based on confusing decision making and risk assessments on their parts. Yes, why indeed is as murderer in minimum security when he's considered dangerous nonetheless? As well how is it they don't have a clue what he was last wearing? How many changes of clothes is he allowed to have in that prison? This right on the heels of giving a 300 pound murderer a day pass and sending one Officer along with him. Those fed officers must be smoking all the ample drugs that get into the Pens.
Can someone tell me what a person serving a life sentence for first degree murder and who is considered dangerous, was doing in a minimum-security prison?
Can someone also tell me why the people or committees responsible for that decision should not be held partially accountable for any harm he causes?
Can someone tell me what a person serving a life sentence for first degree murder and who is considered dangerous, was doing in a minimum-security prison?
So the question, what he was doing there is interesting: soft correction prison system which blindly believes that can be grown up again sometimes(often) brokes. Let's imagine that someone is in high lvl security prison, suddenly he calms down. After 3 years he was calm like morning lake water. So they sent him to middle lvl, there he was for example 5 years..... . After that they send him to minimal security . And "boom" - he escapes. Man, you cannot believe but some prisoners are keeping this plan 30-40 years in their brains. The problem is that in first world countries society gives chance to those people more. I'm not against of it, we all can do mistakes and all have a chance to be forgiven. But those who receive this chance must be checked much better, everything should be not more than enought.
Can someone tell me what a person serving a life sentence for first degree murder and who is considered dangerous, was doing in a minimum-security prison?
Can someone also tell me why the people or committees responsible for that decision should not be held partially accountable for any harm he causes?