Mother Loses Baby for Three Years Due to Refusing C-Section Pre-Consent V.M. has been separated from her baby for three years in the name of "child welfare." All because she didn't want to pre-authorize a cesarean section that neither she nor the hospital had any reason to believe would be medically necessary, and wasn't.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
Who voted on this?
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
You could do this at home and not even consult a doctor during your pregnancy.
What's next... losing your child if you refuse that he get a vaccine, or not going to see a doctor if he gets the sniffles.
Strange thing is that you don't need to go to a hospital to give birth.
You could do this at home and not even consult a doctor during your pregnancy.
I have a young friend who's had all three of her kids at home.
It doesn't list the hospital, but I'm betting it's south of the border.
St. Barnabas Hospital in New Jersey.
It doesn't list the hospital, but I'm betting it's south of the border.
It's somewhere in New Jersey , and it has a 50% C-section rate
Someone's trying to rake in extra cash.
Hurley knows all about this stuff. I think all his kids were born at home.
So were mine. If I would ever have more kids (which I won't
Hurley knows all about this stuff. I think all his kids were born at home.
Yep, both my daughters were born healthy and happy at home. Even our second, at 10lb 12oz. The important thing is that there's someone there who's trained and experienced.
It's absolutely insane that the hospital can get the kid taken away because the mother refused to allow a potentially dangerous last-resort procedure to be treated as routine in her case.
It doesn't list the hospital, but I'm betting it's south of the border.
The article mentioned a New Jersey hospital.
In both cases it was a last resort and she didnt have to sign anything, they can have babies out pretty quick these days.
This situation is completely messed and I wish these parents all the best in their fight with the state and this hospital!
It doesn't list the hospital, but I'm betting it's south of the border.
St. Barnabas Hospital in New Jersey.
Yes, I'm sure its a money maker with the Drs just itching for an excuse to do one and raise their revenue.
Why charge the parents? It wasn't necessary.
It doesn't list the hospital, but I'm betting it's south of the border.
St. Barnabas Hospital in New Jersey.
Yes, I'm sure its a money maker with the Drs just itching for an excuse to do one and raise their revenue.
Why charge the parents? It wasn't necessary.
Yes and it is beneath contempt for medical doctors to put this kind of "fundraising" ahead of patient needs. I have no idea how they managed to justify taking the child away nor how they have managed it continuously for 3 years.