news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Gates: N.Korea could be direct threat to US

Canadian Content
20659news upnews down

Gates: N.Korea could be direct threat to US


Political | 206582 hits | Jan 11 8:14 pm | Posted by: Scape
16 Comment

US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates says North Korea is becoming a direct threat to the United States. He said North Korea will develop an inter-continental ballistic missile within 5 years. The missile could reach the US mainland.

Comments

  1. by avatar GreenTiger
    Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:40 pm
    Tell us something we don't know already.

  2. by avatar Refreshed
    Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:57 pm
    Some people argue that NK isn't a threat.

    I'm not one of those people.

  3. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:51 pm
    "Refreshed" said
    Some people argue that NK isn't a threat.

    I'm not one of those people.


    A threat to who though? SK - yes. NA - not so much.

  4. by avatar Refreshed
    Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:58 pm
    "Gunnair" said
    A threat to who though? SK - yes. NA - not so much.

    True, but in five years that's expected to change.

    From the story... "He said North Korea will develop an inter-continental ballistic missile within 5 years. The missile could reach the US mainland."

  5. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:32 pm
    "Refreshed" said
    A threat to who though? SK - yes. NA - not so much.

    True, but in five years that's expected to change.

    From the story... "He said North Korea will develop an inter-continental ballistic missile within 5 years. The missile could reach the US mainland."

    There's a lot that can happen in five years besides the upcoming regime change and the continued economic failure.

    Besides, NK has not shown the political will to do more than have temper tantrums and the occasional shelling/torpedoing as long as the SK response was weak. As we saw with the last round of threats, NK backed down when SK refused to blink.

    If the US wants to worry about someone, worry about the Chinese. NK is a sideshow.

  6. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:48 pm
    History teaches that it is best to worry about a threat before it is too late.

  7. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:49 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    History teaches that it is best to worry about a threat before it is too late.


    True. It also teaches the consequences of worry about one that isn't really there -Iraq.

  8. by avatar andyt
    Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:09 pm
    Let's assume what he says is comes to pass, that NK develops missiles to reach the US. What's the US going to do about it? Diddley Squat, because Kim Jong Puke was smart enough to get himself some nukes. And because in 5 years the US will be even more in the pocket of the Chinese. They would certainly not be able to launch a pre-emptive strike without Chinese permission, which doesn't seem forthcoming.

    Iraq is one reason that every dickhead out there is trying to get some nukes of his own. Hussein would still be living a happy life if he'd just been smart enough to get some nukes before he started throwing his weight around.

  9. by avatar Zipperfish  Gold Member
    Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:17 pm
    "Gunnair" said
    If the US wants to worry about someone, worry about the Chinese. NK is a sideshow.


    Wise words, sir.

  10. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:19 pm
    "andyt" said
    Let's assume what he says is comes to pass, that NK develops missiles to reach the US. What's the US going to do about it? Diddley Squat, because Kim Jong Puke was smart enough to get himself some nukes. And because in 5 years the US will be even more in the pocket of the Chinese. They would certainly not be able to launch a pre-emptive strike without Chinese permission, which doesn't seem forthcoming.

    Iraq is one reason that every dickhead out there is trying to get some nukes of his own. Hussein would still be living a happy life if he'd just been smart enough to get some nukes before he started throwing his weight around.


    Excellent point. NK and Iraq have taught other states a lesson in US political will. Have nuke - remain untouched. Don't have nuke - get pummeled.

  11. by avatar GreenTiger
    Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:39 pm
    "Zipperfish" said
    If the US wants to worry about someone, worry about the Chinese. NK is a sideshow.


    Wise words, sir.

    I agree NK is just a punk side show, the real potential threat are the Chinese.

  12. by avatar Zipperfish  Gold Member
    Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:56 pm
    "GreenTiger" said
    If the US wants to worry about someone, worry about the Chinese. NK is a sideshow.


    Wise words, sir.

    I agree NK is just a punk side show, the real potential threat are the Chinese.

    I suppose. As a liberal, I would say wouldn't it be a great idea to see if we could peacefully co-exist with China instead of recreating the cold war, but that's probably not a popular opinion these days.

  13. by Thanos
    Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:00 pm
    Get along with each other? There's no money or fun in that at all. What are you, a communist or something?

  14. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Wed Jan 12, 2011 7:40 pm
    "Zipperfish" said

    I suppose. As a liberal, I would say wouldn't it be a great idea to see if we could peacefully co-exist with China instead of recreating the cold war, but that's probably not a popular opinion these days.


    The problem with that is that China wants to claim the Spratly Islands, they've laid claim to islands that belong to Japan, they've promised to annex Taiwan by force if they have to, they're threatening Vietnam, they've recently been building roads in India without permission from India, the last few years they've been sailing submarines in Japanese territorial waters, they've interdicted US ships and planes in international waters and airspace, they've been conducting cyberwarfare, claiming 20% of Canada's Arctic territory, and etc.

    It'd be nice to peacefully coexist with them but they don't seem too interested in that, do they?



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • Khar Sat Jan 15, 2011 2:02 am
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2026 by Canadaka.net