Link Related to Canada in some say

Woman's candy egg seized at border


Uncle Sam | 206997 hits | Jan 10 5:20 pm | Posted by: Hyack
30 Comment

A cross-border kerfuffle over a popular chocolate treat nearly cost a Winnipeg woman a $300 fine and saddled her with a bureaucratic headache.

Comments

  1. by Canuckism
    Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:04 am
    Ridiculous.

  2. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:12 am
    Officials said they've seized more than 25,000 of the treats in 2,000 separate seizures.


  3. by avatar Guy_Fawkes
    Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:31 am
    The threat these Kinder Treats pose to children of the united states is xaggerated



  4. by Lemmy
    Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:31 am
    It seems a bit strange, but if you'd ever had to race a choking kid to the emergency room you might not find it ridiculous.

  5. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:01 am
    I find it strange that a treat with a toy that can't be got at by anyone young enough to be silly enough to put it in their mouths has been banned in a country that has NO issue with kids handling firearms.

  6. by avatar Guy_Fawkes
    Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:05 am
    "Lemmy" said
    It seems a bit strange, but if you'd ever had to race a choking kid to the emergency room you might not find it ridiculous.

    I wouldnt, but I also wouldnt give a toddler a kinder egg.

  7. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:07 am
    "Guy_Fawkes" said
    It seems a bit strange, but if you'd ever had to race a choking kid to the emergency room you might not find it ridiculous.

    I wouldnt, but I also wouldnt give a toddler a kinder egg.
    I would. Just not the toy (or the plastic thing no one can open in the first place), but they can have the chocolate.

  8. by Lemmy
    Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:08 am
    Most of the shit doctors remove from toddlers' throats are objects that their parents wouldn't (didn't) give them.

  9. by avatar Guy_Fawkes
    Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:09 am
    Ya I guess we should ban everything that a toddler can put in their mouth. :roll:

  10. by avatar Public_Domain
    Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:15 am
    :|

  11. by Lemmy
    Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:27 am
    "Guy_Fawkes" said
    Ya I guess we should ban everything that a toddler can put in their mouth.

    PRETTY sure that's not what I said. :roll: Pretend you're a 2 year-old: gets a hold of chocolate egg. Eats egg. Finds something inside egg. What's next?

    Are you suggesting we shouldn't ban ANYTHING on the grounds of "choking hazard"?

  12. by avatar raydan
    Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:28 am
    I don't get it, if they seize this, then I guess they have to seize EVERYTHING small enough to choke a child... including small change and buttons. :?

  13. by Lemmy
    Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:29 am
    "raydan" said
    I don't get it, if they seize this, then I guess they have to seize EVERYTHING small enough to choke a child... including small change and buttons. :?

    No, just toys, especially toys encased in chocolate.

  14. by avatar raydan
    Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:31 am
    "Lemmy" said
    I don't get it, if they seize this, then I guess they have to seize EVERYTHING small enough to choke a child... including small change and buttons. :?

    No, just toys, especially toys encased in chocolate.
    So I guess that Legos are OK then.

    What about chocolat covered almonds?



view comments in forum
You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile