news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Buffet: Rich Should Pay Higher Taxes

Canadian Content
20697news upnews down

Buffet: Rich Should Pay Higher Taxes


Business | 206972 hits | Nov 22 10:45 pm | Posted by: BeaverFever
15 Comment

"If anything, taxes for the lower and middle class and maybe even the upper middle class should even probably be cut further...But I think that people at the high end -- people like myself -- should be paying a lot more in taxes. We have it better than we

Comments

  1. by avatar Arctic_Menace
    Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:09 pm
    And Warren Buffet continues to show why he is an excellent human being. *applauds*

  2. by avatar bootlegga
    Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:16 pm
    R=UP

    Now if he can only convince the rest of the world's millionaires/billionaires to be as generous.

  3. by avatar andyt
    Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:39 pm
    WTF are you posting this now for? I already posted all this stuff, only to be assured by every Joe the Plumber on his forum that it would never work because the rich will just move their money to other jurisdictions.

    But if you think Buffet is alone:

    Rich Germans demand higher taxes


    Bill Gates, Sr., others meet in North Admiral, demand higher taxes for the wealthy


    They've been taxed to the hilt by Labour. Now Dave, George and Nick (who live in a different financial universe) want to squeeze those on £40,000 a year even harder


    That's Dave as in Cameron.

  4. by avatar sandorski
    Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:14 pm
    Dude's obviously a Commie!

  5. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:10 pm
    I'd be impressed if they just paid what they owed instead of all the hiding and loophole nonsense.

  6. by avatar andyt
    Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:19 pm
    "SprCForr" said
    I'd be impressed if they just paid what they owed instead of all the hiding and loophole nonsense.


    That's actually Buffet's point - he pays a lower tax rate than his receptionist because of various tax dodges available to him.

  7. by avatar Proculation
    Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:21 pm
    He paid 19% of taxes while making billions while people earning a 'fair' income had higher rates.

    Maybe the problem is more HOW they tax. The taxation system in the States looks fucked up.

  8. by avatar Public_Domain
    Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:31 pm
    :|

  9. by avatar KorbenDeck
    Wed Nov 24, 2010 4:58 am
    Taxing the rich more wont fix the big problem, all the good jobs are being outsourced. Doesn't matter how much you tax the population if more money is leaving the economy than coming in.

    If Buffet wants to help he can donate billions of his money a year to schools and roads etc.

  10. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:47 pm
    "andyt" said
    I'd be impressed if they just paid what they owed instead of all the hiding and loophole nonsense.


    That's actually Buffet's point - he pays a lower tax rate than his receptionist because of various tax dodges available to him.

    I know, he's been talking about this for a while now. IMHO he should write an update to his book.

  11. by avatar andyt
    Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:53 pm
    "SprCForr" said
    I'd be impressed if they just paid what they owed instead of all the hiding and loophole nonsense.


    That's actually Buffet's point - he pays a lower tax rate than his receptionist because of various tax dodges available to him.

    I know, he's been talking about this for a while now. IMHO he should write an update to his book.

    I don't really get it tho. He paid tax on a lot more money than the secretary - so if the income is higher, shouldn't the tax rate he paid on it be higher too? I understand having various tax dodges that reduce net income, but not how you pay a lower rate on higher earnings.

  12. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:18 pm
    Through the incentives passed to those in a particular tax bracket I presume. How exactly the US system works, I don't know enough to say.

  13. by avatar andyt
    Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:49 pm
    Every tax system is at least nominally progressive - ie the rate goes up on higher incomes. So it really makes no sense that he paid a lower rate on much higher income than his secretary. Maybe his income was capital gains and there's a special, lower, tax rate on that.

  14. by avatar bootlegga
    Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:18 pm
    "andyt" said
    I don't really get it tho. He paid tax on a lot more money than the secretary - so if the income is higher, shouldn't the tax rate he paid on it be higher too? I understand having various tax dodges that reduce net income, but not how you pay a lower rate on higher earnings.


    My guess would be that his higher income/wealth level allows him the opportunity to take advantage of things most people can't afford.

    For example, every Canadian is entitled to put $5000 each year into a TFSA, but how many people can afford to do that every year? Certainly those earning 6 figures probably can, but a single mom with a kid or two making $40,000 a year can't. Same goes for RRSPs. Canadians are allowed to bank 18% of their income (to a maximum of $20,000 or something) each year. But how many do that? most people put in a $1000 or two just before they send in their taxes to get a bigger return and that's all.

    I do know that mortgage interest in the US is a write-off on your taxes, so if Buffet has a huge house with big mortgage payments (I don't know but I doubt it given his own financial acumen), while his secretary has a small house with smaller payments, then right there he would get a larger tax break than she would.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2026 by Canadaka.net