 B.C. jail sex incident prompts lawsuitLaw & Order | 207231 hits | Nov 16 6:59 am | Posted by: wildrosegirl  A woman involved in a widely reported incident in a Kamloops, B.C., jail cell witnessed by several Mounties and jail employees says she never consented to having sex with another woman.Commentsview comments in forum You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
Who voted on this?
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
doesn't parting the knees imply consent?
No.
That says it all to me, not to lessen or deny the facts she is claiming but given the coverage this incident received it's entirely possable she is escallating or even fabricating her side of the story to agree with a law suit. Again I'm not saying this is the case just that it's possible.
doesn't parting the knees imply consent?
No.
I beg to differ.
doesn't parting the knees imply consent?
No.
well what do you need, a bloody note from your parents?
doesn't parting the knees imply consent?
No.
well what do you need, a bloody note from your parents?
Excuse me?
She could be running naked in the streets for all I care, that still does not give any one the right to touch her.
Excuse me?
She could be running naked in the streets for all I care, that still does not give any one the right to touch her.
People!!!
I'm pretty sure Billypilgrim is joking on this one.
He just needs to know how to use the smilies.
If he isn't joking, we'll ban his sorry ass in no time.
Actually, a written agreement is always a good idea, so there's no he said she said, or in this case she said she said, stuff afterwards...
Are you saying that to have sex, you need to marry her first?
Actually, a written agreement is always a good idea, so there's no he said she said, or in this case she said she said, stuff afterwards...
Are you saying that to have sex, you need to marry her first?
No, you should just get it in writing that she agrees to have sex with you and what specifically you're both agreeing to. Otherwise she can later claim she didn't consent, and they're going to believe her, not you.
Excuse me?
She could be running naked in the streets for all I care, that still does not give any one the right to touch her.
People!!!
I'm pretty sure Billypilgrim is joking on this one.
He just needs to know how to use the smilies.
If he isn't joking, we'll ban his sorry ass in no time.
Have you seen all his other posts? Either he has a fucked up sense of humour, or he is dead serious.
Both are reasons to be called on his shit
Have you seen all his other posts? Either he has a fucked up sense of humour, or he is dead serious.
Both are reasons to be called on his shit
A lot of us here have a "fucked up sense of humour".
Maybe he's just off his meds.