news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

4 Canadians killed in Mexico hotel blast: offic

Canadian Content
20688news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

4 Canadians killed in Mexico hotel blast: official


World | 206878 hits | Nov 14 1:37 pm | Posted by: wildrosegirl
20 Comment

Four Canadians are among the six people reported dead after an apparent gas explosion at a resort in Playa del Carmen, Mexico, and a local official says.

Comments

  1. by avatar stemmer
    Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:31 pm
    So sad... With all the natural gas explosions it makes one wonder why anyone would want natural gas....

  2. by Lemmy
    Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:41 pm
    "stemmer" said
    So sad... With all the natural gas explosions it makes one wonder why anyone would want natural gas....


    I guess some people just like having hot water, hot food and hot air in winter. Ask an insurance agent what the safest fuel is, statistically.

  3. by avatar EyeBrock
    Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:45 pm
    You can build a really nice hotel in the third world. Great food etc. but it's still the third world with the associated infrastructure.

    Playa De Carmen is a great spot and I've had a fantastic time on all my visits but there is inherent risk in all these vacation spots in developing countries.

    Buyer beware. It ‘aint Canada.

    My sympathies to the families of those killed in this tragic incident.

  4. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:12 am
    Hopefully it's an accident...

  5. by avatar EyeBrock
    Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:22 am
    "Gunnair" said
    Hopefully it's an accident...



    Mmmm. Good point.

  6. by avatar QBall
    Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:13 pm
    "Lemmy" said
    So sad... With all the natural gas explosions it makes one wonder why anyone would want natural gas....


    I guess some people just like having hot water, hot food and hot air in winter. Ask an insurance agent what the safest fuel is, statistically.

    Well, since you asked (and I am an insurance broker BTW)...

    According to the National Association of Fire Prevention between 2004 and 2008 (in the U.S. obviously as I've never seen statistics for Canada) the number of fires from home heating equipment by fuel type are:

    Liquid-fueled (i.e. oil): 4,170 (38%)
    Electric-powered: 3,660 (33%)
    Gas-fueled (i.e. natural gas): 2,990 (27%)
    Solid-fueled (i.e. wood, coal): 180 (2%)

    Keep in mind one of the reason for solid fuel's low number is that solid fuel furnaces in a home are pretty rare. The number of deaths/injuries resulting from these fire as as follows:

    Liquid-fueled: 0 (0%)/11 (9%)
    Electric-powered: 3 (7%)/36 (27%)
    Gas-fueled: 20 (48%)/85 (64%)
    Solid-fueled: 18 (43%)/0 (0%)

    And property damage from these fire (in millions):

    Liquid-fueled: $10 (14%)
    Electric-powered: $18 (25%)
    Gas-fueled 2,990: $37 (53%)
    Solid-fueled: $5 (8%)

    These are national estimates of fires reported to U.S. municipal fire departments and so exclude fires reported only to Federal or state agencies or industrial fire brigades. So fires from natural gas are less frequent, however their fires tend to cause greater casualties and result in more damage (probably because there is usually an accompanying explosion). So take the numbers as you will.

  7. by avatar raydan
    Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:18 pm
    Good stats, QBall.
    It would be nice to see them compared to the number of homes using each power source, though.

  8. by ASLplease
    Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:25 pm
    are those percentages based on total number of incidents? If so, your assertion would have more weight to it, if it were rates per 100,000.


    "QBall" said
    So sad... With all the natural gas explosions it makes one wonder why anyone would want natural gas....


    I guess some people just like having hot water, hot food and hot air in winter. Ask an insurance agent what the safest fuel is, statistically.

    Well, since you asked (and I am an insurance broker BTW)...

    According to the National Association of Fire Prevention between 2004 and 2008 (in the U.S. obviously as I've never seen statistics for Canada) the number of fires from home heating equipment by fuel type are:

    Liquid-fueled (i.e. oil): 4,170 (38%)
    Electric-powered: 3,660 (33%)
    Gas-fueled (i.e. natural gas): 2,990 (27%)
    Solid-fueled (i.e. wood, coal): 180 (2%)

    Keep in mind one of the reason for solid fuel's low number is that solid fuel furnaces in a home are pretty rare. The number of deaths/injuries resulting from these fire as as follows:

    Liquid-fueled: 0 (0%)/11 (9%)
    Electric-powered: 3 (7%)/36 (27%)
    Gas-fueled: 20 (48%)/85 (64%)
    Solid-fueled: 18 (43%)/0 (0%)

    And property damage from these fire (in millions):

    Liquid-fueled: $10 (14%)
    Electric-powered: $18 (25%)
    Gas-fueled 2,990: $37 (53%)
    Solid-fueled: $5 (8%)

    These are national estimates of fires reported to U.S. municipal fire departments and so exclude fires reported only to Federal or state agencies or industrial fire brigades. So fires from natural gas are less frequent, however their fires tend to cause greater casualties and result in more damage (probably because there is usually an accompanying explosion). So take the numbers as you will.

  9. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:33 pm
    It now up to 5 Canadians :(

  10. by ASLplease
    Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:43 pm
    "PublicAnimalNo9" said
    It now up to 5 Canadians :(


    nice sig, and nice avatar

  11. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:45 pm
    "ASLplease" said
    It now up to 5 Canadians :(


    nice sig, and nice avatar
    Thank you ASL

  12. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:47 pm
    Shoot, sorry to hear this and my sympathies to the families.

    And I agree with the folks who note that Mexico is not Canada. While Mexico has building codes those building codes are routinely nullified by the rampany corruption that typifies Mexico. Meaning that safety equipment that would routinely be installed with natural gas connections in Canada and the US can be done away with in Mexico with a simple bribe.

  13. by avatar CommanderSock
    Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:14 pm
    "EyeBrock" said
    You can build a really nice hotel in the third world. Great food etc. but it's still the third world with the associated infrastructure.

    Playa De Carmen is a great spot and I've had a fantastic time on all my visits but there is inherent risk in all these vacation spots in developing countries.

    Buyer beware. It ‘aint Canada.

    My sympathies to the families of those killed in this tragic incident.



    Hmmmm....Mexico isn't really "3rd world" though. It's the 2nd most developed Latin country in the Americas. But as you said, hopefully an accident.

    My condolences to the families of the victims.

  14. by avatar EyeBrock
    Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:22 pm
    I dunno Sock. It's pretty third world in a lot of areas that I've seen. Any visits outside resort areas looked less than developed to me. Maybe '2 and half' world?



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net