Britain will lose thousands of troops, reduce its ability to fight complex missions like the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and delay a program to upgrade its nuclear defences, Prime Minister David Cameron announced Tuesday.
We don't need an aircraft carrier, and certainly not an old VTOL like the UK uses (nevermind our dubious history with 2nd hand British equipment). Let India buy it and run it into the ground.
Given that Obama wants to cut the US Navy from eleven carriers to four it would be prudent of Canada to start building some carriers. Depending on the USA just isn't going to be in Canada's future.
"desertdude" said Canada does not have an aircraft carrier ?
You need aircraft to own a carrier and that's not something Canada has plenty of. Well maybe if harper actually buys those 65 jets but it's looking like he won't.
"BartSimpson" said We couldn't man and operate one Nimitz class carrier, nevermind two. Frankly, I don't see the need for Canada to have them anyways.
The very best weapons are never used at all.
I agree, but not all taxpayers do. Like I said, Canada does not really have a need for a carrier. I'd far prefer a squadron of nuke subs (or AIP subs), more fighters, a couple dozen P-8As than I would an aircraft carrier.
Shame but not surprising for these cuts.
And no DD, we dont have a carrier.
Canada does not have an aircraft carrier ?
Shameful, isn't it?
Canada does not have an aircraft carrier ?
We had an aircraft carrier a long while back. The Majestic-class HMCS Bonaventure (CVL-22) served us from 1957-1970 before being decommissioned.
We'll never forget you, Bonnie.
-J.
Discount for two ?
And since we cant simply depend on the US for theirs, for the next while at least....
Canada does not have an aircraft carrier ?
We couldn't man and operate one Nimitz class carrier, nevermind two. Frankly, I don't see the need for Canada to have them anyways.
The very best weapons are never used at all.
We couldn't man and operate one Nimitz class carrier, nevermind two. Frankly, I don't see the need for Canada to have them anyways.
The very best weapons are never used at all.
I agree, but not all taxpayers do. Like I said, Canada does not really have a need for a carrier. I'd far prefer a squadron of nuke subs (or AIP subs), more fighters, a couple dozen P-8As than I would an aircraft carrier.