There won’t be any pensions for brutally slain Cpl. Marie-France Comeau and Jessica Lloyd but the man who confessed to their murders will remain eligible for his fat retirement benefits even after pleading guilty.
You guys may not like it but he did pay into his pension for the last 24 years and thus is entitled to it. Would you propose that everyone found guilty of murder have to surrender all their finances accumulated prior to their crimes?
"2Cdo" said You guys may not like it but he did pay into his pension for the last 24 years and thus is entitled to it. Would you propose that everyone found guilty of murder have to surrender all their finances accumulated prior to their crimes?
I said it before in another thread regarding inmates recieving pensions, etc. Give thier pensions to the victims of thier crimes.
Crimes compensation All provinces (except Newfoundland and the Territories) have some form of compensation program for crime victims. The programs vary greatly, but some things victims may receive compensation for are: - Loss caused by injury; - Loss of income and other expenses; - Emergency, health and counselling expenses; - Maintenance of a child born as a result of a sexual assault; and - Pain and suffering (only Ontario and PEI).
Let him draw his pension and then the judicial system should make sure that it's paid to the family of his victims, otherwise he wins again.
People like Williams are the reason some American States have kept the death penalty.
"2Cdo" said You guys may not like it but he did pay into his pension for the last 24 years and thus is entitled to it. Would you propose that everyone found guilty of murder have to surrender all their finances accumulated prior to their crimes?
"Chumley" said You guys may not like it but he did pay into his pension for the last 24 years and thus is entitled to it. Would you propose that everyone found guilty of murder have to surrender all their finances accumulated prior to their crimes?
I said it before in another thread regarding inmates recieving pensions, etc. Give thier pensions to the victims of thier crimes.
Inmates like Clifford Olsen who have spent the majority of their life behind bars, and thus have not contributed to any pension should not recieve any monies. Those who have contributed to their pension should, and do, continue to collect their pension. Williams pension will more than likely go to his wife and family.
"ASLplease" said the US seizes assets from drug dealers.
Assets that have been accumulated through the proceeds of crime, not private pensions. There is a huge difference.
"2Cdo" said You guys may not like it but he did pay into his pension for the last 24 years and thus is entitled to it. Would you propose that everyone found guilty of murder have to surrender all their finances accumulated prior to their crimes?
Agreed. The internet lynch-mob probably won't though.
"EyeBrock" said You guys may not like it but he did pay into his pension for the last 24 years and thus is entitled to it. Would you propose that everyone found guilty of murder have to surrender all their finances accumulated prior to their crimes?
Agreed. The internet lynch-mob probably won't though.
"Chumley" said You guys may not like it but he did pay into his pension for the last 24 years and thus is entitled to it. Would you propose that everyone found guilty of murder have to surrender all their finances accumulated prior to their crimes?
Agreed. The internet lynch-mob probably won't though.
Agreed. I agree that you agree with EB's agreement of 2Cdo post!
Ok, how about this. They get back their own contributions to the pension plan. When I left the military, apparently I didn't have enough time in to qualify for a pension so I got my return of contributions which I rolled into RRSP's.
"Chumley" said Ok, how about this. They get back their own contributions to the pension plan. When I left the military, apparently I didn't have enough time in to qualify for a pension so I got my return of contributions which I rolled into RRSP's.
They should be dealt with according to the rules of the particular pension plan.
Those convicted of terrorist offences in Canada such as the Toronto 18 didn't get any extra-judicial punishments imposed on them, why should anybody else?
Something wrong with that...
Not fucking on. Not fucking on at all.
You guys may not like it but he did pay into his pension for the last 24 years and thus is entitled to it. Would you propose that everyone found guilty of murder have to surrender all their finances accumulated prior to their crimes?
I said it before in another thread regarding inmates recieving pensions, etc.
Give thier pensions to the victims of thier crimes.
All provinces (except Newfoundland and the Territories) have some form of compensation
program for crime victims. The programs vary greatly, but some things victims may receive
compensation for are:
- Loss caused by injury;
- Loss of income and other expenses;
- Emergency, health and counselling expenses;
- Maintenance of a child born as a result of a sexual assault; and
- Pain and suffering (only Ontario and PEI).
Let him draw his pension and then the judicial system should make sure that it's paid to the family of his victims, otherwise he wins again.
People like Williams are the reason some American States have kept the death penalty.
You guys may not like it but he did pay into his pension for the last 24 years and thus is entitled to it. Would you propose that everyone found guilty of murder have to surrender all their finances accumulated prior to their crimes?
the US seizes assets from drug dealers.
You guys may not like it but he did pay into his pension for the last 24 years and thus is entitled to it. Would you propose that everyone found guilty of murder have to surrender all their finances accumulated prior to their crimes?
I said it before in another thread regarding inmates recieving pensions, etc.
Give thier pensions to the victims of thier crimes.
Inmates like Clifford Olsen who have spent the majority of their life behind bars, and thus have not contributed to any pension should not recieve any monies. Those who have contributed to their pension should, and do, continue to collect their pension. Williams pension will more than likely go to his wife and family.
the US seizes assets from drug dealers.
Assets that have been accumulated through the proceeds of crime, not private pensions. There is a huge difference.
You guys may not like it but he did pay into his pension for the last 24 years and thus is entitled to it. Would you propose that everyone found guilty of murder have to surrender all their finances accumulated prior to their crimes?
Agreed. The internet lynch-mob probably won't though.
You guys may not like it but he did pay into his pension for the last 24 years and thus is entitled to it. Would you propose that everyone found guilty of murder have to surrender all their finances accumulated prior to their crimes?
Agreed. The internet lynch-mob probably won't though.
Agreed.
You guys may not like it but he did pay into his pension for the last 24 years and thus is entitled to it. Would you propose that everyone found guilty of murder have to surrender all their finances accumulated prior to their crimes?
Agreed. The internet lynch-mob probably won't though.
Agreed.
I agree that you agree with EB's agreement of 2Cdo post!
So this murderer keeps a nice fat pension, while Capt. Semrau gets demoted and booted after being aquitted ?
Something wrong with that...
Captain Semrau was demoted and discharges after being acquitted? And the Col get to keep his pension. Some rethinking id id order.
So this murderer keeps a nice fat pension, while Capt. Semrau gets demoted and booted after being aquitted ?
Something wrong with that...
Captain Semrau was demoted and discharges after being acquitted? And the Col get to keep his pension. Some rethinking id id order.
Semrau kept his pension too. Both paid into it, both should get what they paid into.
Their crimes or alleged crimes are another entirely different matter.
They get back their own contributions to the pension plan.
When I left the military, apparently I didn't have enough time in to qualify for a pension so I got my return of contributions which I rolled into RRSP's.
Ok, how about this.
They get back their own contributions to the pension plan.
When I left the military, apparently I didn't have enough time in to qualify for a pension so I got my return of contributions which I rolled into RRSP's.
They should be dealt with according to the rules of the particular pension plan.
Those convicted of terrorist offences in Canada such as the Toronto 18 didn't get any extra-judicial punishments imposed on them, why should anybody else?