Iraqi city has higher cancer rates than Hiroshima

Health | 207147 hits | Jul 25 11:39 am | Posted by: Scape

The survey found that in the five years following the 2004 attacks by USA-led forces there has been a four-fold increase in all cancer.

Comments

by Guy_Fawkes
Sun Jul 25, 2010 8:28 pm
Wow its interesting seeing people jumping to conclutions. The article is less than 300 words and people are foaming at the mouth about how evil the US is.
by Brenda
Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:19 pm
Or is the testing better than before?
by KorbenDeck
Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:29 pm
Guess lots of depleted uranium rounds were used during the taking of that city
by Dragom
Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:20 pm
Yes they should really put warning labels on bombs, "Caution: may cause adverse health effects" or something.
by Brenda
Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:24 pm
"Dragom" said
Yes they should really put warning labels on bombs, "Caution: may cause adverse health effects" or something.
by Guy_Fawkes
Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:15 am
"KorbenDeck" said
Guess lots of depleted uranium rounds were used during the taking of that city

That would depend, what was the radiation level of the city before the war?

view comments in forum

Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

Share

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net