CIA drone killings trouble UN rights expert

UN human rights experts are total BS considering who is leading the UN human rights ATM

more bullshit from the UN.

If the number 3 had been hit from an F-16, we wouldnt be talking about this.

The UN is just pissed at the tech upgrades, I guess they think somehow its unfair.

Civilians always die in war, doesnt matter if it comes from

a drone, a B-52, an M1, or a bayonet.

Or a scimitar used for beheading for that matter.
Or an IED.

At least the drones dont rape women and steal food.

You gotta wonder when they're going to stop issuing reports and start proclaiming fatwas.

Oppressing women and gays througout the Arab world is fine but when the Yanks zap a terrorist with a drone the UN whines.

Talk about double standards. The UN is about as credible now as the League of Nations was in 1939.

Good lord people....learn to read and do try and follow the story.

The CBC story so far;

Yanks killing Al Queda terrorists bad.

Arabs mutilating women, oppressing women and killing gays for being gay, not a concern.

That's the thing with international law: no country sees international law as superseding national law, dogma or sovereignty. It's a small shark with no teeth, and that will probably never change.

The CBC story so far;

Yanks killing Al Queda terrorists bad.

Arabs mutilating women, oppressing women and killing gays for being gay, not a concern.


Lefties.....gotta love them.....for target practise. in his case we have to give him and his walker a head start, just to be fair.

The UN is made up of member nations. Over the last number of years the US, which is one important member, has been pushing the envelope on International Law instead of working within the law. This sets a huge and troublesome president among other member nations and quite frankly I for one am glad that at least one man, not unlike many of you, except he's considered an expert, is keeping his eye on the situation. What he may think of Arab gays and women is of little consequence to the above story and....for target practise.....are you as psychopathic as you come across or just plain pathetically moronic?

The problem is Wada, who chooses what is of consequence? I get that you dig what the CBC looks at as a story of interest.

Is it pathetically moronic to be concerned about the plight of gays and women in Arab countries and in Africa?

Or should we be more concerned about the US killing bad guys?

It's notable that the CBC routinely chooses stories that portray the US or Israel et al in a negative light but it doesn't shine that investigative light on the treatment of minority groups/women/gays in despotic nations within the UN.

But of course it's just moronic for us to doubt the purveyors of information within the tax-funded CBC.

"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

It would appear that all subjects of the media are equal, but some subjects are more equal than others.

In this case Al Qaeda bad guys deserve more press and sympathy than the women being mutilated daily in the Sudan or how gays are beaten and killed in the Gaza Strip just for being gay.

Is it pathetically moronic to be concerned about the plight of gays and women in Arab countries and in Africa?

Absolutely not! and it still has absolutely nothing to do with the article, either. I have heard CBC radio cover women's issues in Arab countries and I think gay issues too. If your sincere about these issues then you certainly do not need CBC's imput to do something of worth in this regard. Have at it and I will join your cause.

The drones are doing very well in killing terrorists, they can follow them from the air and when the time is right they can send them to their 72 virgins.

Israel is buying and building their own versions.

The United Nations, which for the most part has the moral authority of a whore house, doesn't like them possibly because the terrorist are their own people.

I think the use should be expanded to be used against pirate ships and their mother ships. It might not stop them, but it will make piracy a bit more dangerous. If the UN objects

I am sincere about these issues Wada. I just wish more attention was paid to the plight of women, girls, gays and minority groups in the Arab world and Africa. It's a criminal offence in most African countries for people of the same gender to have intimate relationships.

In most of the Arab world, women are treated as chattel. I don't see the same enthusiasm on discussing these issues in the mainstream media as I see when Israel or the US are being criticised for one thing or another. It’s this I find very hypocritical.

I am sincere about these issues Wada. I just wish more attention was paid to the plight of women, girls, gays and minority groups in the Arab world and Africa. It's a criminal offence in most African countries for people of the same gender to have intimate relationships.

In most of the Arab world, women are treated as chattel. I don't see the same enthusiasm on discussing these issues in the mainstream media as I see when Israel or the US are being criticised for one thing or another. It’s this I find very hypocritical.


Every country is hypocritical in its own way.

We ignored toxic ships dumping waste in the coast of Somalia, we ignore the French Legion's actions in Central Africa, we've ignored the CIA's involvement in Latin America and Iran (contra scandal etc), we've ignored the poisoning of Colombian farmer's crops, so what's so surprising about us westerners turning a blind eye now.

The League of Nations fell apart mainly due to Europe's imperial ambitions and its shameless resource grabs. Perhaps the UN will fall apart due to the same reason.