news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

‘Al-Qaeda bomb plotter’ can stay in Britain

Canadian Content
20717news upnews down

‘Al-Qaeda bomb plotter’ can stay in Britain


Strange | 207171 hits | May 18 12:44 pm | Posted by: commanderkai
10 Comment

An Al Qaeda operative arrested in a high profile terror swoop won the right to stay in Britain today because he would be in danger if he returned to his native Pakistan.

Comments

  1. by avatar martin14
    Tue May 18, 2010 8:22 pm
    *shakes head*

    Hopefully the Tories can actually do something to change this type of nonsense.

  2. by avatar andyt
    Tue May 18, 2010 8:38 pm
    How very Canadian of them. We have a bunch of those numbnuts hanging around too. They should just ask Pakistan for every assurance :wink: that he won't be tortured. After all Pstan in our ally - surely we can trust them.

  3. by avatar Bacardi4206
    Tue May 18, 2010 8:46 pm
    Wait, they are known terrorists. Suspected of planning a attack which would most likely have killed civilians. Yet they are allowed to stay for fear of what Pakistan would do them? Heres a idea, who gives a fuck? If they die in pakistan, that is the consiquence of there actions in joining a terrorist organization. They also forfiet all rights as a human being by doing so. By being the scum of the earth that gets a political kick out of killing civilians.

  4. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue May 18, 2010 9:49 pm
    "Bacardi4206" said
    Wait, they are known terrorists. Suspected of planning a attack which would most likely have killed civilians. Yet they are allowed to stay for fear of what Pakistan would do them? Heres a idea, who gives a fuck? If they die in pakistan, that is the consiquence of there actions in joining a terrorist organization. They also forfiet all rights as a human being by doing so. By being the scum of the earth that gets a political kick out of killing civilians.


    Could also hand them over to the Russian Navy. Seems the Russkies know how to deal with this kind of vermin lately.

  5. by avatar kenmore
    Tue May 18, 2010 10:40 pm
    "andyt" said
    How very Canadian of them. We have a bunch of those numbnuts hanging around too. They should just ask Pakistan for every assurance :wink: that he won't be tortured. After all Pstan in our ally - surely we can trust them.


    Right on... keep them here, keep them plotting and don't forget to give them the Canadian gift that keeps on giving .. welfare...
    Well said andyt, well said.

  6. by avatar commanderkai
    Tue May 18, 2010 10:54 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    Could also hand them over to the Russian Navy. Seems the Russkies know how to deal with this kind of vermin lately.


    I honestly don't see why we shouldn't. Better sending the terrorists to them for "Proper" treatment then sending them back to Pakistan or Syria or other unreliable countries. As much as Russia is wishing back it's superpower days, I no doubt could see West-Russian cooperation against terrorist networks. They have their own issues, after all.

  7. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Tue May 18, 2010 11:33 pm
    Well, fact is, although it's extremely easy to blame the individual judge, it ignores the fact the decision like this are based on interpretations of law, policy and procedures. It seemed quite clear that what the judge wanted to do was conflicted by what he legally could do. I would submit, that all those who regularly vent their spleen on judges, keep in mind that they have to follow laws and precedent.

    Blame the politicians that seem to lack the political will to affect change.

  8. by avatar andyt
    Wed May 19, 2010 6:38 am
    "Gunnair" said


    Blame the politicians that seem to lack the political will to affect change.


    I blame us. We're the ones that elect the politicians.

  9. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Wed May 19, 2010 7:03 am
    "andyt" said


    Blame the politicians that seem to lack the political will to affect change.


    I blame us. We're the ones that elect the politicians.
    And that matters how?? Harper or Iggy? Giant douche or a turd sandwich? You can even choose who the douche and who the turd sandwich is :lol:
    And that pretty much says it for the game of politics in any country.

  10. by avatar andyt
    Wed May 19, 2010 7:11 am
    "PublicAnimalNo9" said


    Blame the politicians that seem to lack the political will to affect change.


    I blame us. We're the ones that elect the politicians.
    And that matters how?? Harper or Iggy? Giant douche or a turd sandwich? You can even choose who the douche and who the turd sandwich is :lol:
    And that pretty much says it for the game of politics in any country.

    Absolutely - but as a people we stand still for it. As long as we're reasonably comfortable, we won't squawk. Or we'll squawk, but that's about it.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net