news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Eastern Canada won't cut back on West's dirty m

Canadian Content
20710news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Eastern Canada won't cut back on West's dirty money


Political | 207086 hits | Dec 15 5:12 pm | Posted by: Alta_redneck
7 Comment

If you think that Canada’s delegation to Copenhagen is already divided on ideological lines between the governing Conservatives and the opposition parties lobbying for binding targets, the cracks in our national unity have just deepened along different fa

Comments

  1. by Anonymous
    Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:28 am
    This is an opinion piece!but it's damn funny and true

  2. by avatar DrCaleb
    Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:32 am
    The truth sucks, doesn't it? When is the Bloc going to run some candidates in the West, so we can give them the majority they need?

  3. by avatar OldChum
    Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:40 pm
    Yes but some in the US and here are saying is all of this dirt worth the price , Alberta what you going to do with those growing sludge ponds bet you America won,t have them .

  4. by Anonymous
    Wed Dec 16, 2009 2:31 pm
    "OldChum" said
    Yes but some in the US and here are saying is all of this dirt worth the price , Alberta what you going to do with those growing sludge ponds bet you America won,t have them .


    some? :roll:
    When Americans stop driving cars we'll stop supplying the oil.
    What are you going to do when the cash drys up?
    What will you do with all the unemployed who move back home?
    What will you do when the federal government raises taxes to make up for the shortfall?
    What will you use as a replacement for oil?
    What are you going to do with Saskatchewan's oil sands?


    Questions that need to be answered first.

  5. by avatar Akhenaten
    Wed Dec 16, 2009 2:45 pm
    Since supposedly the goal is to reduce CO2 emission world wide then I think I have a better idea. Instead of us financing Africa to pump/extract more oil and emit more CO2 while we keep going with the oil sands, why not instead have Europe and Africa pay compensation to shut them down?

    Win win situation. Unless of course CO2 emissions aren't really as attractive a goal as extorting money from us to pay Africa to extract more of their natural resources.

  6. by avatar OldChum
    Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:16 am
    "gigs" said
    Yes but some in the US and here are saying is all of this dirt worth the price , Alberta what you going to do with those growing sludge ponds bet you America won,t have them .


    some? :roll:
    When Americans stop driving cars we'll stop supplying the oil.
    What are you going to do when the cash drys up?
    What will you do with all the unemployed who move back home?
    What will you do when the federal government raises taxes to make up for the shortfall?
    What will you use as a replacement for oil?
    What are you going to do with Saskatchewan's oil sands?


    Questions that need to be answered first.

    To bad no one is as there are alternatives that would work if we spent the money and time to get them off the ground . It is that it is to easy for the oil companies to be lazy, why do you not supply some alternatives instead just the usual not possible attitude

  7. by avatar PluggyRug
    Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:09 am
    "OldChum" said

    To bad no one is as there are alternatives that would work if we spent the money and time to get them off the ground . It is that it is to easy for the oil companies to be lazy, why do you not supply some alternatives instead just the usual not possible attitude



    Here's an alternative, leave oil alone. Why screw with a product the whole world uses.

    Now if you can provide an alternative, go for it. The reply I expect is silence or blah, blah ect, ect. To bad what old bird.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • Akhenaten Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:22 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net