news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Cap n Trade Not Necessay in US if EPA Gets Invo

Canadian Content
20711news upnews down

Cap n Trade Not Necessay in US if EPA Gets Involved


Uncle Sam | 207110 hits | Dec 07 1:35 pm | Posted by: N_Fiddledog
4 Comment

An "endangerment" finding by the Environmental Protection Agency could require businesses that emit carbon dioxide to make costly changes in machinery to reduce emissions -- even if Congress doesn't pass pending climate-change legislation.

Comments

  1. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Mon Dec 07, 2009 10:08 pm
    Cap n trade would still be the prefered way of going, because it allows Obamicans to pick and chose winners, also exert greater control over the great unwashed.

    However, if it doesn't fly, and it doesn't look like it will, they can still use the EPA.

  2. by Lemmy
    Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:21 am
    "N_Fiddledog" said
    Cap n trade would still be the prefered way of going, because it allows Obamicans to pick and chose winners, also exert greater control over the great unwashed.

    However, if it doesn't fly, and it doesn't look like it will, they can still use the EPA.


    The problem with hard quotas (command and control, the article calls it), rather than taxes or tradeable permits, is the cost of enforcement. You were complaining earlier about bureaucracy in environmental policy. Well, enforcing output levels requires an army of enforcement agents. Economic policies, like taxes or tradeable permits, create positive incentives for business to be cleaner and they need less policing because they affect the companies' cost curves. The only incentive created by hard quotas is the incentive to emit illegally, dump or cheat some way. There is no cheating with taxes and permits because the external cost is internalized into the companies' private cost curve. The profit-maximizing level of emissions is built into the economic policy.

  3. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:01 am
    Don't get me wrong I'm not in favor of any method. I'm a Moncktonian.

    "The proper response to a non-problem is do nothing"

    ~Lord Christoper Monckton~

  4. by Lemmy
    Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:43 am
    And, like I said before, I respect both sides of the debate. Maybe there's a climate change problem, maybe there is not. I'm not a scientist. Frankly I don't even care about the answer. In my opinion, we're likely fucking up the planet in all sorts of ways that we shouldn't be. Also, in my opinion, most corporations do not act in a socially-optimal manner. We ought to monitor their activity much more closely, including their use of the environment.

    I'll trust the scientists to figure out if we have a problem in need of solving. But I'm an economist. My role is to comment on the soundness of EACH side's policy in its likely effectiveness in achieving their goals.

    Mostly I take up the "Defeatist's position": I'll be dead long before the Earth will be fucked up enough to kill me. In 4B years or so the Sun will expand into a red giant and incinerate the Earth, so humanity is doomed anyway. We might as well suck this fucking planet dry and enjoy the ride now...there's no retirement to save for, in the long run.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2026 by Canadaka.net