news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Alberta to spend $495M on carbon capture pipeli

Canadian Content
20671news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Alberta to spend $495M on carbon capture pipeline


Environmental | 206714 hits | Nov 25 12:31 am | Posted by: Hyack
20 Comment

Alberta is spending $495 million over 15 years for a 240-kilometre pipeline that companies can hook into for collecting and storing carbon dioxide, it was announced Tuesday.

Comments

  1. by ridenrain
    Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:18 pm
    With so much information showing that this whole climate change is bunk, you'd think that they would sit on this for a while. When it's all shown to be BS, Alberta is going to look pretty stupid with their brand new hole in the ground.

  2. by avatar stemmer
    Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:52 pm
    What a waste of money... Why not put it into healthcare, education or some other social program....

  3. by avatar DrCaleb
    Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:40 pm
    "ridenrain" said
    With so much information showing that this whole climate change is bunk, you'd think that they would sit on this for a while. When it's all shown to be BS, Alberta is going to look pretty stupid with their brand new hole in the ground.


    So, what's wrong with cleaning up the environment anyway? I'm kind of tired of companies using the water and air, and not returning it in the condition we lent it to them in. Why do I always have to pay to clean up their mess?

  4. by avatar Robair
    Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:51 pm
    "ridenrain" said
    With so much information showing that this whole climate change is bunk, you'd think that they would sit on this for a while. When it's all shown to be BS, Alberta is going to look pretty stupid with their brand new hole in the ground.
    I've got more than a few family members who could always use another pipeline welding job.

  5. by Anonymous
    Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:04 pm
    "ridenrain" said
    With so much information showing that this whole climate change is bunk, you'd think that they would sit on this for a while. When it's all shown to be BS, Alberta is going to look pretty stupid with their brand new hole in the ground.


    Give it a while. You can bet governments around the world are sitting on this new revaluation and waiting for each other to react.
    Another year and Al gore will be eating at the soup kitchen and Suzuki will be using grow-ops for his only source of income.

  6. by avatar Alta_redneck
    Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:23 pm
    This will replace the practice of pumping millions of gallons of fresh water down wells to push up more oil. Albertans have been complaining of this for years, all this water is lost forever. Cleaning up the air, conserving fresh water and getting the Canadian tax payer to throw in a few nickels at the same time is a win win win situation.

  7. by ASLplease
    Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:14 pm
    at least its a more practical solution than D Suzuki has offered.

  8. by avatar KorbenDeck
    Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:33 pm
    Regardless of if Global Warming is real or not, it doesn't hurt to keep that crap out of the air.

    Anyone been to China or L.A. lately? Don't know about you but I do not enjoy the air quality there.

  9. by ASLplease
    Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:50 pm
    Lethbridge Alberta has poor air quality?

  10. by ridenrain
    Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:56 pm
    "Alta_redneck" said
    This will replace the practice of pumping millions of gallons of fresh water down wells to push up more oil. Albertans have been complaining of this for years, all this water is lost forever. Cleaning up the air, conserving fresh water and getting the Canadian tax payer to throw in a few nickels at the same time is a win win win situation.


    Has this been done anywhere abd does it work? I can't imagine pumping a gas underground, expecting it to stay there and expecting oil to float on it.

  11. by avatar Alta_redneck
    Thu Nov 26, 2009 12:06 am
    "ridenrain" said
    This will replace the practice of pumping millions of gallons of fresh water down wells to push up more oil. Albertans have been complaining of this for years, all this water is lost forever. Cleaning up the air, conserving fresh water and getting the Canadian tax payer to throw in a few nickels at the same time is a win win win situation.


    Has this been done anywhere abd does it work? I can't imagine pumping a gas underground, expecting it to stay there and expecting oil to float on it.

    Yep they are, have been for a couple of years from Nova Petrochemicals and I believe from Union Carbide also, east of Red Deer. Right now their trucking it to the wells and as far as I know, all the smart guys are happy with it.

  12. by avatar Alta_redneck
    Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:12 am
    I should add that the oil doesn't float, it's pressure that forces it through the rock formations or say up hill. There might be a pool right next to a well but 100 feet lower and it's not worth spending $25 or so million to get it. The way I understand how it works is they drill a small hole to it, pump the crap gas down and it pushes the oil into the pool the well is sucking out of. Just like how gas forces the syrup out of the fountain pop machine at your local 7 / 11.

    Someone like Dino may want to fine tune that explanation. :)

  13. by avatar herbie
    Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:44 am
    Yeah! Let's BURY the stuff... problem solved.
    Forrest Gump for Minister of the Environment!

  14. by avatar bootlegga
    Thu Nov 26, 2009 3:31 am
    "Alta_redneck" said
    This will replace the practice of pumping millions of gallons of fresh water down wells to push up more oil. Albertans have been complaining of this for years, all this water is lost forever. Cleaning up the air, conserving fresh water and getting the Canadian tax payer to throw in a few nickels at the same time is a win win win situation.


    No doubt, especially given that drought has hit eastern and southern Alberta hard over the past few years. All that water can be used for drinking or something else instead of being injected a km under the surface.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net