news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

States can't afford death penalty

Canadian Content
20726news upnews down

States can't afford death penalty


Uncle Sam | 207262 hits | Oct 20 8:34 am | Posted by: Robair
15 Comment

This is according to a new report that concludes that states are wasting millions on an inefficient death penalty system, diverting scarce funds from other anti-crime and law enforcement programs.

Comments

  1. by avatar GreenTiger
    Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:02 pm
    If states want to maintain the death penalty and do it efficiently how about a firing sqad.

  2. by avatar Robair
    Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:06 pm
    "GreenTiger" said
    If states want to maintain the death penalty and do it efficiently how about a firing sqad.

    I don't get it. How does that make it cheaper???

  3. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:59 pm
    Firing squad is still an alternative.

    What makes it so expensive are the appeals.

    If you don't execute anyway, why not just turn the sentence into life without parole?

  4. by avatar KorbenDeck
    Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:02 am
    "Robair" said
    If states want to maintain the death penalty and do it efficiently how about a firing sqad.

    I don't get it. How does that make it cheaper???
    7 bullets is cheaper than the drugs they use to kill them. No special doctors, chairs, and equipment. Just a wall, 7 officers, 7 loaded guns... and the janitor.

  5. by avatar OldChum
    Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:08 am
    Yes we could open it up to tickets and sell them to the public, hell the Romans had public floggings .

  6. by ridenrain
    Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:22 am
    I agree about the legal wranglings..
    The thing is, their bending over backward to make killing the people humane and to a large extent, it never can be. I'm partial to the gas chamber because it's also cheap and, like it or not, everyone has to breath sooner or later.

  7. by avatar Robair
    Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:27 am
    "KorbenDeck" said
    If states want to maintain the death penalty and do it efficiently how about a firing sqad.

    I don't get it. How does that make it cheaper???
    7 bullets is cheaper than the drugs they use to kill them. No special doctors, chairs, and equipment. Just a wall, 7 officers, 7 loaded guns... and the janitor.
    You think the drugs they use is what makes it expensive?

    Uh, no.

    Not

    at

    all.

    Killing somebody is expensive because nobody wants to kill somebody who is wrongfully convicted. The expensive part is the endless appeals etc that are necessary.

    Even then, you are not garaunteed zero wrongfull convictions.

  8. by avatar Scape
    Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:47 am
    Add to that the huge backlog it creates on the justice system. Every appeal is like a trial all its own.

  9. by avatar Brenda
    Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:48 am
    Are there automatic appeals when you get life without parole?

  10. by avatar herbie
    Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:04 am
    Quite a possibility.
    Can't end the death penalty on moral grounds like a civilized country, end it because it's not cost efficient. How fucking that would be.

  11. by avatar Scape
    Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:11 pm
    "Brenda" said
    Are there automatic appeals when you get life without parole?


    Long term imprisonment is better for conviction rates and it's cheaper as juries are more likely to convict if the sentence will be life rather then death. Also, death penalty trials will go over every possible detail with a fine tooth comb opening up far more options for appeals. Most states have mandatory appeals process for death penalty cases. Each execution can cost between $2.5 million to $5 million. While the cost of keeping a 25-year old inmate for 50 years at present, amounts to a grand total of $805,000.




    Quick stats

    In the last 30 years in the U.S., over 100 people have been released from death row because they were exonerated by DNA evidence. These are ALL people who were found guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Unfortunately, DNA evidence is not available in most cases. So, as long as the death penalty is in place, you are pretty much GUARANTEED to occasionally execute an innocent person.

  12. by avatar Pseudonym
    Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:22 pm
    Do those costs include the average appeals costs for those who are doing life in prison as well?

  13. by avatar Scape
    Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:32 pm
    The cost is doubled as two trials instead of one will be conducted: one for guilt and one for punishment.

  14. by avatar Robair
    Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:33 pm
    "Scape" said
    Are there automatic appeals when you get life without parole?


    Long term imprisonment is better for conviction rates and it's cheaper as juries are more likely to convict if the sentence will be life rather then death. Also, death penalty trials will go over every possible detail with a fine tooth comb opening up far more options for appeals. Most states have mandatory appeals process for death penalty cases. Each execution can cost between $2.5 million to $5 million. While the cost of keeping a 25-year old inmate for 50 years at present, amounts to a grand total of $805,000.




    Quick stats

    In the last 30 years in the U.S., over 100 people have been released from death row because they were exonerated by DNA evidence. These are ALL people who were found guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Unfortunately, DNA evidence is not available in most cases. So, as long as the death penalty is in place, you are pretty much GUARANTEED to occasionally execute an innocent person
    Yup. R=UP



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net