This is according to a new report that concludes that states are wasting millions on an inefficient death penalty system, diverting scarce funds from other anti-crime and law enforcement programs.
"Robair" said If states want to maintain the death penalty and do it efficiently how about a firing sqad.
I don't get it. How does that make it cheaper??? 7 bullets is cheaper than the drugs they use to kill them. No special doctors, chairs, and equipment. Just a wall, 7 officers, 7 loaded guns... and the janitor.
I agree about the legal wranglings.. The thing is, their bending over backward to make killing the people humane and to a large extent, it never can be. I'm partial to the gas chamber because it's also cheap and, like it or not, everyone has to breath sooner or later.
"KorbenDeck" said If states want to maintain the death penalty and do it efficiently how about a firing sqad.
I don't get it. How does that make it cheaper??? 7 bullets is cheaper than the drugs they use to kill them. No special doctors, chairs, and equipment. Just a wall, 7 officers, 7 loaded guns... and the janitor. You think the drugs they use is what makes it expensive?
Uh, no.
Not
at
all.
Killing somebody is expensive because nobody wants to kill somebody who is wrongfully convicted. The expensive part is the endless appeals etc that are necessary.
Even then, you are not garaunteed zero wrongfull convictions.
Quite a possibility. Can't end the death penalty on moral grounds like a civilized country, end it because it's not cost efficient. How fucking that would be.
"Brenda" said Are there automatic appeals when you get life without parole?
Long term imprisonment is better for conviction rates and it's cheaper as juries are more likely to convict if the sentence will be life rather then death. Also, death penalty trials will go over every possible detail with a fine tooth comb opening up far more options for appeals. Most states have mandatory appeals process for death penalty cases. Each execution can cost between $2.5 million to $5 million. While the cost of keeping a 25-year old inmate for 50 years at present, amounts to a grand total of $805,000.
Quick stats
In the last 30 years in the U.S., over 100 people have been released from death row because they were exonerated by DNA evidence. These are ALL people who were found guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Unfortunately, DNA evidence is not available in most cases. So, as long as the death penalty is in place, you are pretty much GUARANTEED to occasionally execute an innocent person.
"Scape" said Are there automatic appeals when you get life without parole?
Long term imprisonment is better for conviction rates and it's cheaper as juries are more likely to convict if the sentence will be life rather then death. Also, death penalty trials will go over every possible detail with a fine tooth comb opening up far more options for appeals. Most states have mandatory appeals process for death penalty cases. Each execution can cost between $2.5 million to $5 million. While the cost of keeping a 25-year old inmate for 50 years at present, amounts to a grand total of $805,000.
Quick stats
In the last 30 years in the U.S., over 100 people have been released from death row because they were exonerated by DNA evidence. These are ALL people who were found guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Unfortunately, DNA evidence is not available in most cases. So, as long as the death penalty is in place, you are pretty much GUARANTEED to occasionally execute an innocent person Yup.
If states want to maintain the death penalty and do it efficiently how about a firing sqad.
I don't get it. How does that make it cheaper???
What makes it so expensive are the appeals.
If you don't execute anyway, why not just turn the sentence into life without parole?
If states want to maintain the death penalty and do it efficiently how about a firing sqad.
I don't get it. How does that make it cheaper???
7 bullets is cheaper than the drugs they use to kill them. No special doctors, chairs, and equipment. Just a wall, 7 officers, 7 loaded guns... and the janitor.
The thing is, their bending over backward to make killing the people humane and to a large extent, it never can be. I'm partial to the gas chamber because it's also cheap and, like it or not, everyone has to breath sooner or later.
If states want to maintain the death penalty and do it efficiently how about a firing sqad.
I don't get it. How does that make it cheaper???
7 bullets is cheaper than the drugs they use to kill them. No special doctors, chairs, and equipment. Just a wall, 7 officers, 7 loaded guns... and the janitor.
You think the drugs they use is what makes it expensive?
Uh, no.
Not
at
all.
Killing somebody is expensive because nobody wants to kill somebody who is wrongfully convicted. The expensive part is the endless appeals etc that are necessary.
Even then, you are not garaunteed zero wrongfull convictions.
Can't end the death penalty on moral grounds like a civilized country, end it because it's not cost efficient. How fucking that would be.
Are there automatic appeals when you get life without parole?
Long term imprisonment is better for conviction rates and it's cheaper as juries are more likely to convict if the sentence will be life rather then death. Also, death penalty trials will go over every possible detail with a fine tooth comb opening up far more options for appeals. Most states have mandatory appeals process for death penalty cases. Each execution can cost between $2.5 million to $5 million. While the cost of keeping a 25-year old inmate for 50 years at present, amounts to a grand total of $805,000.
Quick stats
In the last 30 years in the U.S., over 100 people have been released from death row because they were exonerated by DNA evidence. These are ALL people who were found guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Unfortunately, DNA evidence is not available in most cases. So, as long as the death penalty is in place, you are pretty much GUARANTEED to occasionally execute an innocent person.
Are there automatic appeals when you get life without parole?
Long term imprisonment is better for conviction rates and it's cheaper as juries are more likely to convict if the sentence will be life rather then death. Also, death penalty trials will go over every possible detail with a fine tooth comb opening up far more options for appeals. Most states have mandatory appeals process for death penalty cases. Each execution can cost between $2.5 million to $5 million. While the cost of keeping a 25-year old inmate for 50 years at present, amounts to a grand total of $805,000.
Quick stats
In the last 30 years in the U.S., over 100 people have been released from death row because they were exonerated by DNA evidence. These are ALL people who were found guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Unfortunately, DNA evidence is not available in most cases. So, as long as the death penalty is in place, you are pretty much GUARANTEED to occasionally execute an innocent person
Yup.