news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Elizabeth May's seat bid in B.C. seen as aiding

Canadian Content
20674news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Elizabeth May's seat bid in B.C. seen as aiding Tories


Political | 206741 hits | Sep 09 9:50 am | Posted by: ridenrain
21 Comment

OTTAWA–A prominent environmentalist in the West Coast riding where Elizabeth May has staked her fortunes fears the only thing the Green party leader will succeed at is helping a Conservative cabinet minister keep his seat.

Comments

  1. by avatar SigPig
    Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:13 pm
    No matter where she runs, all she does is help the others running against her.

    Until they find a new leader the Green Party will go nowhere. It is impossible to take this woman seriously at a time where they are trying to portray themselves as a serious alternative with serious platforms.

  2. by ridenrain
    Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:21 pm
    I was wondering if the current Liberal leader will choose to not run a candidate against her, like they did last time.

  3. by avatar poquas
    Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:47 pm
    May is a joke, but she might have picked the right riding to "drop in" on this time.

  4. by avatar Zipperfish  Gold Member
    Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:27 pm
    What did we do in BC to deserve Elizabeth May? Born rich, brought up privileged, another lawyer.

    I'll say this for Stephen Harper (from his wiki page)

    He is the first prime minister since Lester B. Pearson not to have attended law school.


    (Although he is an economist, which is not much higher on the "removed from reality" scale.)

  5. by EdwardRI
    Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:56 pm
    "Zipperfish" said

    (Although he is an economist, which is not much higher on the "removed from reality" scale.)

    I just got my economics degree and I'm taking a year off before going to law school :-/

  6. by avatar poquas
    Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:59 pm
    "EdwardRI" said

    (Although he is an economist, which is not much higher on the "removed from reality" scale.)

    I just got my economics degree and I'm taking a year off before going to law school :-/

    So should we wait until you finish or can we start calling you bad names now? :lol:

  7. by EdwardRI
    Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:28 am
    You can start now.

  8. by avatar Zipperfish  Gold Member
    Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:30 am
    "EdwardRI" said

    (Although he is an economist, which is not much higher on the "removed from reality" scale.)

    I just got my economics degree and I'm taking a year off before going to law school :-/

    Well you'll find some good company in policy-wonk land! It would be fine if economists stuck to delaing with economic issues and lawyers stuck to law, but for some reason, bot professions feel ideally suited to senior political advisory roles and politics, where they are both horribly over-represented.

  9. by EdwardRI
    Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:35 am
    "Zipperfish" said

    Well you'll find some good company in policy-wonk land! It would be fine if economists stuck to delaing with economic issues and lawyers stuck to law, but for some reason, bot professions feel ideally suited to senior political advisory roles and politics, where they are both horribly over-represented.

    I like money too much to work in the public sector. I plan to run manage my family's assets.

  10. by Lemmy
    Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:09 am
    "Zipperfish" said

    (Although he is an economist, which is not much higher on the "removed from reality" scale.)


    Again, Harper is not an economist. An MA in economics doesn't make one an economist any more than an MA in English Literature makes one a novelist.

  11. by avatar Scape
    Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:22 am
    "Zipperfish" said
    What did we do in BC to deserve Elizabeth May?



    Never been to the Gulf Islands I see. Hippie central...

    Why I'm Moving to British Columbia: Green Leader or How many affluent hippies does it take to push a camel through the eye of a needle?

  12. by EdwardRI
    Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:27 am
    "Lemmy" said

    (Although he is an economist, which is not much higher on the "removed from reality" scale.)


    Again, Harper is not an economist. An MA in economics doesn't make one an economist any more than an MA in English Literature makes one a novelist.
    What makes an economist to you?

  13. by avatar Public_Domain
    Thu Sep 10, 2009 5:38 am
    :|

  14. by avatar Zipperfish  Gold Member
    Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:13 am
    "Mr_Canada" said
    What did we do in BC to deserve Elizabeth May? Born rich, brought up privileged, another lawyer.

    I'll say this for Stephen Harper (from his wiki page)

    He is the first prime minister since Lester B. Pearson not to have attended law school.


    (Although he is an economist, which is not much higher on the "removed from reality" scale.)

    Plus, May is an American.

    I'm just wondering here though... Why is education so threatening?

    The intelligent leaders, they're all hated for that reason. While in any other
    position, your education is honoured and demanded. But if you're a politician,
    by god dammit, he shouldn't even have his High School degree, or else it'll seem
    like he's showing us up.

    I wouldn't mind if Harper went to Law School. Wouldn't change my opinion of him.

    First off, for me, it's not so much her education, so much as her silver spoon upbringing for May. I don't even have much against that--great for her--but I just don't think she has much of a grasp of the reality that most ordinary Canadians live in.

    As for education--she's a lawyer. Sorry, I just think they are massively overrepresented in Parliament. I don't follow party lines on election day, and often my vote is based on which candidate is not a lawyer. They're plenty smart and all that, but they bring only a particular viewpoint and increase, in my opinion, adversarial politics.

    And some people, frankly, are simply educated far beyond any possible usefulness.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net