news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Ignatieff pushing risky EI reforms: economists

Canadian Content
20687news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Ignatieff pushing risky EI reforms: economists


Political | 206864 hits | Aug 01 9:32 am | Posted by: stokes
190 Comment

OTTAWA -- Some economists and small business leaders fear Michael Ignatieff is trying to revive employment insurance reforms that proved disastrous to the economy and Liberal political fortunes 38 years ago.

Comments

  1. by ridenrain
    Sat Aug 01, 2009 6:59 pm
    If it was such a good idea, why didn't they do it when they were in charge?
    It's a stupid idea. We need to help people who are losing their jobs, not people who just got a job and want the summer off.

  2. by avatar Scape
    Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:27 pm
    I agree however 700 hours is too much and even if he was to make it 360 it should be a one time option only but not permanent policy. The only reason why EI is even on the table is the downturn was so fast it highlighted the inconsistency in the program. Make it uniform but don't make it 9 weeks it should be at least 14.

  3. by ridenrain
    Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:42 pm
    The people who are losing their jobs now were the ones working through the good period so they already qualify for EI. Reducing the threshold won't help those auto or forestry workers. It's simply pandering to he masses for political purposes.
    .

  4. by avatar leewgrant
    Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:53 pm
    "Scape" said
    I agree however 700 hours is too much and even if he was to make it 360 it should be a one time option only but not permanent policy. The only reason why EI is even on the table is the downturn was so fast it highlighted the inconsistency in the program. Make it uniform but don't make it 9 weeks it should be at least 14.


    It was the Liberals who introduced the idea of a variable entrance requirement. The only reason that they want to change it now is because they think it will be a vote getter. Can't believe though that Iggy would force an election over it.

  5. by ridenrain
    Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:16 pm
    "leewgrant" said
    I agree however 700 hours is too much and even if he was to make it 360 it should be a one time option only but not permanent policy. The only reason why EI is even on the table is the downturn was so fast it highlighted the inconsistency in the program. Make it uniform but don't make it 9 weeks it should be at least 14.


    It was the Liberals who introduced the idea of a variable entrance requirement. The only reason that they want to change it now is because they think it will be a vote getter. Can't believe though that Iggy would force an election over it.


    That's not fair. Iggy was still an American back then. :D
    The Bloc are saying they'll vote against this so the Libs are forced into supporting the government, forcing an election or abstaining AGAIN.

  6. by avatar Scape
    Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:18 pm
    I don't agree with lowering the standard but removing regional variable entrance requirement. That and making the self employed a part of the program hereby making the system more accessible and consistent. The markers for determining what the hours qualify should be determined by the Canadian economy's overall performance.

  7. by avatar leewgrant
    Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:27 pm
    "ridenrain" said
    I agree however 700 hours is too much and even if he was to make it 360 it should be a one time option only but not permanent policy. The only reason why EI is even on the table is the downturn was so fast it highlighted the inconsistency in the program. Make it uniform but don't make it 9 weeks it should be at least 14.


    It was the Liberals who introduced the idea of a variable entrance requirement. The only reason that they want to change it now is because they think it will be a vote getter. Can't believe though that Iggy would force an election over it.


    That's not fair. Iggy was still an American back then. :D
    The Bloc are saying they'll vote against this so the Libs are forced into supporting the government, forcing an election or abstaining AGAIN.

    If Iggy keeps propping up the government Libs will wonder how he is different from Dion.

  8. by avatar Scape
    Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:06 pm
    So far, in style only. Drop the green shift and he's the same guy.

  9. by stokes
    Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:12 pm
    I wonder since he was out of Canada for sooooo long maybe he forgot all about the effects that happened last time, which was not such a good thing :lol: :lol:

    I have to agree with all the comments here though, a general do-over of the whole EI system may not be the best answer but making it more accessible to all might just work.....but not after 360 hours!!!!!

  10. by ridenrain
    Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:13 pm
    Iggy had far more potential, which makes it so much more the loss.
    He's educated, worldly and pragmatic. He's just running for the wrong party, that's all.

  11. by avatar EyeBrock
    Sat Aug 01, 2009 11:58 pm
    I agree. He'd be a great Tory. Crap Liberal though.

  12. by OnTheIce
    Sun Aug 02, 2009 3:05 am
    It's a terrible idea, as the past shows us that it encourages system abuse.

    It will be interesting to see if these economists are worthy of Liberal supporter attention, like the ones regarding the recession...their opinion was respected.

  13. by avatar leewgrant
    Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:37 am
    "ridenrain" said
    Iggy had far more potential, which makes it so much more the loss.
    He's educated, worldly and pragmatic. He's just running for the wrong party, that's all.


    I think he's going to have to change his public profile. I watch Question Period occasionally and he as Leader of the the Opposition always asks the first question. I regard him as coming across as a condescending academic. If he portrays that during an election campaign it'll lose him votes.

  14. by Anonymous
    Mon Aug 03, 2009 9:28 pm
    "leewgrant" said
    I regard him as coming across as a condescending academic. If he portrays that during an election campaign it'll lose him votes.


    Yeah, the pooping puffin was classy. Iggy just uses his words.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • ridenrain Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:43 am
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net