TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras - Honduras' newly appointed leader vowed Monday to resist pressure from across the Americas to reinstate the president ousted in a military coup, as protesters burned tires outside the occupied presidential palace.
From this story, it sounds like the army jumped the gun.
The coup came the same day a controversial constitutional referendum was set to take place, despite strong opposition from his own party and a Supreme Court ruling that it was illegal.
The referendum was to ask voters if they would want another vote in November, to be held in conjunction with the next presidential election, on whether to convene a group of experts to rewrite the constitution. Critics said that Zelaya hoped to remove limits to his re-election.
A referendum that has strong opposition and is ruled illegal is unlikely to pass and even if it did, is still a far way away from setting up another dictator. The fact that this guy is a friend of Chavez isn't a good charactor reference though.
The Law he was attempting to overturn was quite ridiculous. Unfortunately for him, even suggesting the change of that Law was in fact breaking that Law. No such Law should ever exist IMO.
"sandorski" said The Law he was attempting to overturn was quite ridiculous. Unfortunately for him, even suggesting the change of that Law was in fact breaking that Law. No such Law should ever exist IMO.
Are you suggesting we should impose upon them a law that we think makes sense?
"xerxes" said Because they've negated the will of the people of Honduras by ousting their democratically elected leader.
Sometimes the electorate doesn't know what's good for them...especially in countries where education is minimal at best. Turkey is another good example. The generals keep the the Islamists from taking over, keeping Turkey the most secular and egalitarian of all Muslim countries.
"xerxes" said Because they've negated the will of the people of Honduras by ousting their democratically elected leader.
Who was openly and in defiance of Supreme Court orders trying to find a way to have his tenure extended beyond constitutional term limits. All of which was, as someone already indicated, a back door way to have himself declared President-for-life, just like his buddy Hugo Chavez.
The coup probably wasn't the way to get it done but Zelaya was clearly acting illegally himself. Obama really blew this one big time by condemning the military while letting El Presidente off the hook.
True, but like Riden mentioned, the army jumped the gun. The referendum had yet to happen, and if it had passed, there's no way of telling of how things would have turned out.
"xerxes" said True, but like Riden mentioned, the army jumped the gun. The referendum had yet to happen, and if it had passed, there's no way of telling of how things would have turned out.
The Law is draconian. Like I posted above, even mentioning changing it was Illegal and automatically prevented the person suggesting it from running for Office for 10 years. The result of a Referendum would be null and void.
Zelaya holding a referendum is really the opposite of being a dictator, isn�t it? I agree the military acted hastily as well. Had he succeeded, maybe, just maybe the coup leaders might have had a case. By tossing him before the voting public had their say, they�ve created a no-win situation. The country is about to be isolated and Zelaya can�t go back without probably being killed resulting in an even more serious international reaction.
The referendum was to ask voters if they would want another vote in November, to be held in conjunction with the next presidential election, on whether to convene a group of experts to rewrite the constitution. Critics said that Zelaya hoped to remove limits to his re-election.
A referendum that has strong opposition and is ruled illegal is unlikely to pass and even if it did, is still a far way away from setting up another dictator. The fact that this guy is a friend of Chavez isn't a good charactor reference though.
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/s ... TopStories
The Law he was attempting to overturn was quite ridiculous. Unfortunately for him, even suggesting the change of that Law was in fact breaking that Law. No such Law should ever exist IMO.
Are you suggesting we should impose upon them a law that we think makes sense?
Because they've negated the will of the people of Honduras by ousting their democratically elected leader.
Sometimes the electorate doesn't know what's good for them...especially in countries where education is minimal at best. Turkey is another good example. The generals keep the the Islamists from taking over, keeping Turkey the most secular and egalitarian of all Muslim countries.
Because they've negated the will of the people of Honduras by ousting their democratically elected leader.
Who was openly and in defiance of Supreme Court orders trying to find a way to have his tenure extended beyond constitutional term limits. All of which was, as someone already indicated, a back door way to have himself declared President-for-life, just like his buddy Hugo Chavez.
The coup probably wasn't the way to get it done but Zelaya was clearly acting illegally himself. Obama really blew this one big time by condemning the military while letting El Presidente off the hook.
True, but like Riden mentioned, the army jumped the gun. The referendum had yet to happen, and if it had passed, there's no way of telling of how things would have turned out.
The Law is draconian. Like I posted above, even mentioning changing it was Illegal and automatically prevented the person suggesting it from running for Office for 10 years. The result of a Referendum would be null and void.