 President Nicolas Sarkozy said on Monday that the burka was not welcome in secular France, condemning the head-to-toe cover as a symbol of subjugation rather than the Muslim faith.
"We cannot accept to have in our country women who are prisoners behind Comments
view comments in forum You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.
|
|
now if only canada and the U.S would follow.
If they want us to make sure our women dress appropiately when we go to Saudi Arabia, we expect the same in return.
Not sure I agree with this, however, I will use to demonstrate that France sometimes has a hell of a lot more balls than Canada and the US.
Agreed. I'm on the fence with that. That being said, I'm totally opposed to allowing the veil/burka to be left on in let's say, a courtroom, or a driver's license photo. The fact in some of these outfits, you can only see the eyes, and that there have been cases where criminals have left the country wearing these things.
Not sure I agree with this, however, I will use to demonstrate that France sometimes has a hell of a lot more balls than Canada and the US.
I agree with the sentiment, but not with the banning. If they want to wear it for religious purposes they should have the right. If it's really about a secular society why stop at burkas? Why not ban turbans, and those religious knives? What about crosses on a necklace?
I agree with the sentiment, but not with the banning. If they want to wear it for religious purposes they should have the right. If it's really about a secular society why stop at burkas? Why not ban turbans, and those religious knives? What about crosses on a necklace?
It isn't for religous purposes though. Many highly respected muslism have stated the koran makes no mention of this.
I worked with a muslim and he said basically those are extremist values, that he did not share.
We can't really compare it to a turban either, you may see religon when some women clad from head to toe in black who scares the shit of your son as she steps off a bus as something that perhaps should be accepted in our society in order to appear as "welcoming".
I see neanderthals married to a women who feels the need to cover her up, so no other man can look at her. Something you would do to your 69 camaro in order to protect it from vandals & thieves.
Even if it was for religous purposes, I wouldn't care. We have cultural norms as well that should be respected.
I agree with the sentiment, but not with the banning. If they want to wear it for religious purposes they should have the right. If it's really about a secular society why stop at burkas? Why not ban turbans, and those religious knives? What about crosses on a necklace?
It isn't for religous purposes though. Many highly respected muslism have stated the koran makes no mention of this.
Perhaps the burka is not, but this was taken from the article as well:
As for an outright ban, that seems to clearly violate our Charter. Is anyone familiar with the protection of religious rights under French law? Sarkozy's plan, as I read it, would not stand a Charter challenge in Canada.