 Tax hike likely unavoidable, Liberal leader says “We will have to raise taxes,” but not at the expense of hurting the recovery from this recession. He added that “an honest politician” cannot exclude a tax hike as an option.Commentsview comments in forum You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
At least, we don't have Obama. Poor americans...
Never a tax didn't like, is there. The pesants can always eat turnips while the czar and his aparatchiks devise the next glorious 5 year plan.
The real problem is the existence of this ubiquitous "THEY". Our governments have simply become too big. Even those on the extreme left must recognize that government in Canada has become a runaway Frankenstein monster; created with good intent, but run amok.
Thank you socialist Harper !
At least, we don't have Obama. Poor americans...
I agree but try and cut some arts funding in Quebec and tell how the left will recognise this burning nessesity.
If a tenth of all the waste in government was cut, there'd be AMPLE money for healthcare, education AND arts funding in Quebec. We're paying for many thousands things MUCH more frivolous than arts. The left and the right would both be pleased with the results of a good government downsizing.
Thank you socialist Harper !
At least, we don't have Obama. Poor americans...
"... because of the increasing debt."
It is Harper's debt.
Thank you socialist Harper !
At least, we don't have Obama. Poor americans...
"... because of the increasing debt."
It is Harper's debt.
Ok.... We're in a recession you know? Things were good two years ago, what's changed since then?
Where the hell did anyone think it was going to come from eventually? It’s not going to matter what party is in control.
I agree but try and cut some arts funding in Quebec and tell how the left will recognise this burning nessesity.
If a tenth of all the waste in government was cut, there'd be AMPLE money for healthcare, education AND arts funding in Quebec. We're paying for many thousands things MUCH more frivolous than arts. The left and the right would both be pleased with the results of a good government downsizing.
While I agree, there is simply nothing more eternal than a temporary govenment program to a speial interest group. I guarantee that any cuts to Indian affairs, multiculturalism or any of the big white elephants will be the club that pounds the ruling government into the ground, reguardless of side or agreement.
While I agree, there is simply nothing more eternal than a temporary govenment program to a speial interest group. I guarantee that any cuts to Indian affairs, multiculturalism or any of the big white elephants will be the club that pounds the ruling government into the ground, reguardless of side or agreement.
Yup.
"... because of the increasing debt."
It is Harper's debt.
Ok.... We're in a recession you know? Things were good two years ago, what's changed since then?
Harper only made a deficit to stay in power. Before the "Coalition", the budget was going to be even. He spent to keep power.
The Conservative MP and Quebec lieutenant is now scrambling to save the Mont-Mégantic Observatory, which threatens to become a symbol of the Harper government's recent cuts to research agencies.
“I'm offended and I'm angry,” Mr. Paradis said in an interview yesterday. “I was put in front of a fait accompli. I learned of the decision like everyone else, and it came as a surprise.”
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ ... ional/home
There is no huge, unprotected bucket of money marked "slush fund". The only place big money can be found is in a lot of small places. This is one of them.
Harper only made a deficit to stay in power. Before the "Coalition", the budget was going to be even. He spent to keep power.
I agree %100. So is it fair to call him a socialist or a oportunist?