Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2026 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2026 by Canadaka.net
Maybe France can help you out with that.
Maybe France can help you out with that.
Should have been a condition of letting them rejoin NATO's military command.
The Canadian Government keeps changing there story that it's getting confusing.
I guess it doesn't matter, I mean if we cannot finish this war by 2011 than we should just say fuck it and ditch anyway. Too much money and effort is wasted on Afghanistan for little to no appreciation from the Afghanistan people or even citizens world wide. I would bet 50 dollars with all the money we spend on the ANA they will just go corrupt. Sell there new Canadian Rifles and weapons to the Taliban, accept bribes from the Taliban and probally just go completly corrupt where the taliban can just leak back into Afghanistan and undo all we have done.
Does Afghanistan have any source of income at all? Because right now western governments are pretty much footing the bill to pay for the ANA and ANP. Once we all leave Afghanistan. We cannot pay for the Afghanistan Military forever. If they cannot get enough income to pay all the soldiers than like I said. They will stop working, go corrupt and Afghanistan will be back to where it use to be.
Iraq may have been a war nobody should have entered but they atleast will get out of Iraq with a larger chance of success. With reconstruction complete. Iraq has the resources it can trade to get the income to afford there military and even continue the reconstruction of there country without western help.
Are we out of the country, out of the south or just out of combat?
Do you have any details?
We are gone in 2011 period. Whether certain countries get off their ass and replace us or not (reference France and Germany). I don't know what you are referring to when you say the government keeps changing their minds. This had been the plan from the start and it hasn't changed.
It has changed actually, first they said they would leave in 2011 if NATO diddn't send in additional troops in the region to help the CF and also lend some choppers for use to that region that the CF could use.
Than they flip flopped and said they were going to leave by 2011 period. That is why it's confusing.
These conditions are being met on schedule. A U.S. Army battalion has deployed to Kandahar; these additional 1,000 troops doubled the total of coalition combat forces in the province. More U.S. reinforcements are expected in Afghanistan in 2009. The Canadian Forces have acquired and deployed the prescribed helicopters and UAVs to Kandahar. And NATO allies have been notified that Canada will end its military presence in 2011.
...
Action on Canada’s priorities is being designed and executed to achieve concrete progress by 2011, when our military mission in Kandahar ends. For greater effect, we continue to concentrate military and civilian efforts in Kandahar while maintaining an influential diplomatic and development presence in Kabul, so that security, governance and development programs reinforce each other.
http://www.afghanistan.gc.ca/canada-afg ... px?lang=en
2011: Canadian combat mission ends. They may still have people in country but in a non-combat position.
They also may have RCMP...