![]() Climate change No. 1 threat to polar bears: Arctic nationsEnvironmental | 206836 hits | Mar 19 4:12 pm | Posted by: Hyack Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Who voted on this?
|
At least they mentioned the fact that the people who actually live in Canada's north have actually been seeing an increase in polar bears. The radio story still steamrolled these locals as wrong though.
This story doesn't even mention the opposing view
You've probably seen the commercials; TV actor Noah Wyle (ER, The Librarian) somberly informs us of an impending grave catastrophe: "A tragedy is unfolding in the world today. Climate change is threatening one of the most magnificent wild animals on the planet. Polar bears. They're struggling to survive."
Heart-tugging violins accompany video footage of a mother polar bear and her cuddly cub on a small ice flow.
The ice is melting all around them and food is becoming harder to find as they lose their hunting grounds. Climate change. It's happening right now and its leaving mothers weaker and unable to provide for their young and cubs dying without enough to eat. As the struggle and the search for food continues polar bears are hanging on for survival. Polar bears are on their way to extinction. If we don't act now, most will die in our children's lifetime. But you can change that. Call now and join the Wildlife Rescue Team. For just $16 a month you'll be part of the most ambitious effort to save wildlife and wild places the world has ever seen.... If we don't act now, it could be too late for the polar bear.
It is a fundraising appeal for the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), one of the wealthiest environmentalist groups on the planet. The implied message is that the mother bear and cub in the film have been caught by the camera crew in their last desperate gasps, victims of man-made global warming. We are supposed to believe from the images we see, based upon Wyle's narration, that they are weak and starving and soon will be joining the other members of their rapidly dying species.
However, there are several big problems with this picture and message. First of all, there is no evidence provided in the commercial or by WWF in its literature or on its website that this particular polar bear and her cub are weak, starving, or in any distress whatsoever. For all we can tell they are healthy and happy, floating on their iceberg as polar bears do and have done since they've been around on this planet. It is only the narration and the music that suggest otherwise. But, more importantly, the main message of the commercial is a ... big lie. No sense in mincing words. Completely contrary to the WWF's maudlin claims that the cuddly predators are on "their way to extinction," polar bear populations have been exploding. The number of polar bears in the world is four to five times greater than it was 50 years ago, increasing from around 5,000 to an estimated 25,000.
Canadian biologist Dr. Mitchell Taylor, one of the foremost authorities on polar bears, says: "We're seeing an increase in bears that's really unprecedented, and in places where we're seeing a decrease in the population it's from hunting, not from climate change." Dr. Taylor is a real scientist who actually goes out into the field and tracks, observes, tags, and counts polar bears and other arctic mammals. He has been doing this for over two decades, unlike the computer modelers who are making their dire predictions based on their own theoretical climate scenarios.
More on Dr. Taylor and his findings are available from the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works:
"Of the 13 populations of polar bears in Canada, 11 are stable or increasing in number. They are not going extinct, or even appear to be affected at present," Taylor said, noting that Canada is home to two-thirds of the world's polar bears.
He added: "It is just silly to predict the demise of polar bears in 25 years based on media-assisted hysteria."
In September, Taylor further debunked the latest report hyping fears of future polar bear extinctions.
"I think it's naive and presumptuous," Taylor said, referring to a recent report by the U.S. government warning that computer models predict a dire future for the bears due to projected ice loss....
Taylor also debunked the notion that less sea ice means less polar bears by pointing out that southern regions of the bears' home with low levels of ice are seeing booming bear populations. He noted that in the warmer southern Canadian region of the Davis Strait with lower levels of ice, a new survey will reveal that bear populations have grown from an estimated 850 bears to an estimated 3000 bears. And, despite the lower levels of ice, some of the bears measured in this region are among the biggest ever on record.
"Davis Strait is crawling with polar bears. It's not safe to camp there. They're fat. The mothers have cubs. The cubs are in good shape," he said, according to a September 14, 2007 article.
He added: "That's not theory. That's not based on a model. That's observation of reality."
Sen. James Inhofe says of the polar bear "extinction" myth:
The bottom line is that the attempt to list the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act is not based on any evidence that the polar bear populations are declining or in trouble. It is based on computer climate models fraught with uncertainties. The truth is that we clearly do not know enough about most of the polar bear populations to make the argument for listing.
And frankly, listing the polar bear isn't about the bear either. It is about trying to bring about climate change regulations using the most powerful development-stopping law in the land, the Endangered Species Act. Polar bears are being used to achieve long sought left-wing environmental regulatory policies.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech-main ... onment/675
Unlike the polar bear, they actually are endangered, and the reason they are is their habitat is being destroyed to plant palm trees for bio-fuels, and make carbon off-set bucks from the Kyoto accord.
The real "canary in the coal mine" is the orangutan.
Unlike the polar bear, they actually are endangered, and the reason they are is their habitat is being destroyed to plant palm trees for bio-fuels, and make carbon off-set bucks from the Kyoto accord.
I don't in any way intend to make light of the threat to the orangutan - it is dire and immediate. But it has been present longer than Kyoto and bio-fuels.
The real "canary in the coal mine" is the orangutan.
Unlike the polar bear, they actually are endangered, and the reason they are is their habitat is being destroyed to plant palm trees for bio-fuels, and make carbon off-set bucks from the Kyoto accord.
I don't in any way intend to make light of the threat to the orangutan - it is dire and immediate. But it has been present longer than Kyoto and bio-fuels.
There has been a lot written concerning what I'm talking about, but I just typed into google and grabbed the first paragraph from the first on the list.
Several plantation owners are eyeing Tanjung Puting National Park, a sanctuary for 6,000 of the endangered animals. It is the world’s second-largest population of a primate that experts warn could be extinct in less than two decades if a massive assault on its forest habitat is not stopped.
The orangutans’ biggest enemy, the United Nations says, is no longer poachers or illegal loggers. It’s the palm oil industry.
But yeah there's more to it, than just Kyoto.
The EU has maintained the policy even though a report in April 2008 by scientists at the European Environment Agency called the mandate an “overambitious” experiment “whose unintended effects are difficult to predict and difficult to control.”
Instead of cutting greenhouse-gas emissions, production of palm oil on peat swamp forests actually might boost the amount of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere.
Leveling the jungle not only destroys trees that absorb carbon dioxide but releases millions of tons of carbon dioxide stored in Borneo’s peat for thousands of years. Fires set to clear trees and stumps add to the problem.
Were the Orangutans in trouble before biofuels? Maybe, but there's trouble, and there's TROUBLE!
The North American bark beetle has been bothersome since like forever, even in times of at least equal warmth, but it didn't become a plague until Green bureaucracy started blocking proper forest management practices, thus creating bark beetle smorgasbords. Excessive Eco-nuttiness causes actual problems, and the end-game for the Orangutans is a warning.
This is even more biased than the radio version!
At least they mentioned the fact that the people who actually live in Canada's north have actually been seeing an increase in polar bears. The radio story still steamrolled these locals as wrong though.
This story doesn't even mention the opposing view
I don't really know too much about the whole topic, but I remember seeing or reading somewhere that people are seeing more polar bears due to a number of reasons. One of them being that the sea ice wasn't sustained long enough (melted earlier, froze later). In turn, they head south looking for food. This, coupled with the fact that it looks like polar bear populations are increasing after reading that article posted on here.
Just a thought and a very real possibility. I'm not trying to say you are wrong.
This is even more biased than the radio version!
At least they mentioned the fact that the people who actually live in Canada's north have actually been seeing an increase in polar bears. The radio story still steamrolled these locals as wrong though.
This story doesn't even mention the opposing view
I don't really know too much about the whole topic, but I remember seeing or reading somewhere that people are seeing more polar bears due to a number of reasons. One of them being that the sea ice wasn't sustained long enough (melted earlier, froze later). In turn, they head south looking for food. This, coupled with the fact that it looks like polar bear populations are increasing after reading that article posted on here.
Just a thought and a very real possibility. I'm not trying to say you are wrong.
Your exactly right but without the fearmongering these researchers dont get any more money for grant's to do these studies.
It pisses me off because it's guys's that come out with these figures that really fuck any real research up with their bullshit.
And the local populace just seem's to eat it right up,that's why I refer to these folk's as envirofoilers.