news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Global warming causing birds to shift north

Canadian Content
20675news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Global warming causing birds to shift north


Environmental | 206761 hits | Feb 10 2:30 pm | Posted by: Hyack
17 Comment

An Audubon Society study to be released Tuesday found that more than half of 305 birds species in North America, a hodgepodge that includes robins, gulls, chickadees and owls, are spending the winter about 55 kilometres farther north than they did 40 year

Comments

  1. by Anonymous
    Tue Feb 10, 2009 10:52 pm
    a 40 year study is proof of this?

  2. by avatar PluggyRug
    Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:02 pm
    If the following quote is true, then the article does not make any sense....


    Milder winters mean the birds don't need to expend as much energy shivering, and can get by eating less food in the day.

  3. by avatar sandorski
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:08 am
    "PluggyRug" said
    If the following quote is true, then the article does not make any sense....


    Milder winters mean the birds don't need to expend as much energy shivering, and can get by eating less food in the day.


    Why? Makes sense to me.

  4. by Schnek
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:31 am
    Hittin the critics from all angles! now they're using Birds to prove global warming! haha

  5. by avatar stemmer
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:36 pm
    Global warming is a myth being propagated by socialists and globalists to help push forward their goal of wealth redistribution and a single world government...

    I will never surrender my Canadian sovereignty to the UN... Brusells will not be my new Ottawa...!!!

  6. by avatar sandorski
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 3:35 pm
    "Schnek" said
    Hittin the critics from all angles! now they're using Birds to prove global warming! haha


    GW is already Proven. The effects of it are what this is about and not an attempt to prove anything.

  7. by avatar stemmer
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 3:59 pm
    Then prove GW OR prove I'm a holocaust denier.... Go ahead punk, make my day....

  8. by Anonymous
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:00 pm
    "sandorski" said
    Hittin the critics from all angles! now they're using Birds to prove global warming! haha


    GW is already Proven. The effects of it are what this is about and not an attempt to prove anything.

    that it is....it warms then cools then warms again right now it's cooling again.

    we shouldn't mess with mother nature.

  9. by avatar sandorski
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:10 pm
    "stemmer" said
    Then prove GW OR prove I'm a holocaust denier.... Go ahead punk, make my day....


    already proven. read a science website, not a Nutter Blog.

  10. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:31 pm
    "sandorski" said
    Then prove GW OR prove I'm a holocaust denier.... Go ahead punk, make my day....


    already proven. read a science website, not a Nutter Blog.

    I don't know, ya know. If you're attaching automatic credibility to a website with the word "science" in the title without checking out alternative information, I think you're kind of naive. It you're attaching automatic credibility to studies from hidden agenda organizations like the Audubon Society in that article, or the WWF, or Green Peace elsewhere you're triply naive.

    BTW I've been noticing more than a few stories lately about arctic birds being noticed farther south than they've ever been before which is the exact opposite of what that quote/unquote study implies should happen.

    Here's a story from a nutter blog you should check out...

    There is an Eskimo word for Robin

    Also GW may be pretty much accepted from say 1700 to 2000 at least, but AGW significant enough to be noticed has never been proven anywhere by anybody. Not on a website with "science" in the title, or anywhere else.

  11. by avatar Zipperfish  Gold Member
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:44 pm
    "N_Fiddledog" said

    I don't know, ya know. If you're attaching automatic credibility to a website with the word "science" in the title without checking out alternative information, I think you're kind of naive. It you're attaching automatic credibility to studies from hidden agenda organizations like the Audubon Society in that article, or the WWF, or Green Peace elsewhere you're triply naive.



    Hopefully the same would apply to sites like junkscience.com

  12. by avatar PluggyRug
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:55 pm
    "sandorski" said

    Milder winters mean the birds don't need to expend as much energy shivering, and can get by eating less food in the day.


    Why? Makes sense to me.


    If they can do better in warmer climates, why move north.

    Birds will move to find an area which provides ample food and safety to raise their young.

    Many of their traditional breeding area's are now sub-divisions.

    Like I said, the article does not provide the real underlying reason(s) why bird migration patterns shift and therefore is just another straw grasping exercise from the AGW crowd.

  13. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:57 pm
    "Zipperfish" said

    I don't know, ya know. If you're attaching automatic credibility to a website with the word "science" in the title without checking out alternative information, I think you're kind of naive. It you're attaching automatic credibility to studies from hidden agenda organizations like the Audubon Society in that article, or the WWF, or Green Peace elsewhere you're triply naive.



    Hopefully the same would apply to sites like junkscience.com

    Well, if you're just asking for my personal opinion, then sure, absolutely. You should always check out the info from all sides, then decide for yourself, or at least whenever possible. I even go to RealClimate sometimes.

  14. by avatar stemmer
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
    Then do your civic duty and purchase some carbon credits from the snake oil man of your choose...

    Al Gore seems to be the most popular...

    The problem is there are too smart mouthed punks around here....



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • mtbr Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:52 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net