news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

U.S. does not ask Canada to extend Afghan missi

Canadian Content
20686news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

U.S. does not ask Canada to extend Afghan mission


Military | 206845 hits | Feb 10 1:58 pm | Posted by: Hyack
11 Comment

Extending Canada's mission in Afghanistan beyond 2011 didn't come up at a meeting in Ottawa on Tuesday between top U.S. and Canadian military leaders.

Comments

  1. by avatar SaulT
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 1:58 am
    hmm... dont dont honestly think we can leave afghanistan in 2011. Currently, things in Afghanistan are a bit too hot (no pun intended) for the Canadian Forces to leave Afghanistan.

  2. by avatar Streaker
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:03 am
    Pretty misleading headline. Natynczyk wouldn't be the one the Yanks would approach about extending the mission.

  3. by avatar Streaker
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:05 am
    "SaulT" said
    hmm... dont dont honestly think we can leave afghanistan in 2011. Currently, things in Afghanistan are a bit too hot (no pun intended) for the Canadian Forces to leave Afghanistan.



    Ridiculous. We get out in 2011 and stop wasting any more money on this quagmire. We've subsidised this Yank war long enough.

  4. by stokes
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:25 am
    The part that I love is the headline says "US does not ask Canada to extend" but in the third paragraph it says they didnt discuss our withdrawl....but they choose the headline about extension.

    Personally I dont see how we can leave in 2011 without other "Nato" countries coming into the fold and doing some work...regardless of how you feel Streaker!!

  5. by avatar Streaker
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 3:18 am
    "stokes" said
    The part that I love is the headline says "US does not ask Canada to extend" but in the third paragraph it says they didnt discuss our withdrawl....but they choose the headline about extension.

    Personally I dont see how we can leave in 2011 without other "Nato" countries coming into the fold and doing some work...regardless of how you feel Streaker!!


    Extending this unpopular mission beyond 2011 so far appears to be a political impossibility, though. Even the Conservative government seems to realise this.

    Political considerations, whether we like them or not, will win the day on this one. Of course, who knows what could happen between now and 2011 to alter those political considerations.

  6. by roger-roger
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:02 am
    It's also a physical impossiblity, the CF is showing signs of considerable strain from Afganistan. It's hard to think what state we will be in at 2011, the only thing that is certain is that we will not be nearly as commited to Afghanistan.

  7. by avatar Bacardi4206
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:59 pm
    Why don't we stay further. Limit the ammount of soldiers we place in the country and change our roles to just teaching the ANA and ANP how to battle the Taliban and police there country.

    We still make a effort in the war but we aren't actually fighting the war anymore.

  8. by roger-roger
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:18 pm
    "Bacardi4206" said
    Why don't we stay further. Limit the ammount of soldiers we place in the country and change our roles to just teaching the ANA and ANP how to battle the Taliban and police there country.

    We still make a effort in the war but we aren't actually fighting the war anymore.

    That is pretty much what is going to happen, they will probably scale the Canadian contribution to somewhere under 1000 and we will be in mainly mentoring roles. Afghanistan should no longer be a priorty after 2011.

  9. by avatar 2Cdo
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:56 pm
    "Streaker" said
    The part that I love is the headline says "US does not ask Canada to extend" but in the third paragraph it says they didnt discuss our withdrawl....but they choose the headline about extension.

    Personally I dont see how we can leave in 2011 without other "Nato" countries coming into the fold and doing some work...regardless of how you feel Streaker!!


    Extending this unpopular mission beyond 2011 so far appears to be a political impossibility, though. Even the Conservative government seems to realise this.

    Political considerations, whether we like them or not, will win the day on this one. Of course, who knows what could happen between now and 2011 to alter those political considerations.

    I'm shocked! I actually agree with something Streaker wrote!

  10. by avatar bootlegga
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:14 pm
    "Eisensapper" said
    Why don't we stay further. Limit the ammount of soldiers we place in the country and change our roles to just teaching the ANA and ANP how to battle the Taliban and police there country.

    We still make a effort in the war but we aren't actually fighting the war anymore.

    That is pretty much what is going to happen, they will probably scale the Canadian contribution to somewhere under 1000 and we will be in mainly mentoring roles. Afghanistan should no longer be a priorty after 2011.

    Yeah, that's pretty much my guess too.

    We'll have some troops training the ANA, some police training theirs, and there will more focus on civilian projects, like building schools and infrastructure.

  11. by roger-roger
    Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:31 pm
    The EROC team will probably be there still, but they will be at the request of the Americans or Brits.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • SaulT Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:58 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net