news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Soldiers jailed for child porn

Canadian Content
20844news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Soldiers jailed for child porn


Military | 208436 hits | Nov 30 11:37 am | Posted by: Hyack
63 Comment

BRANDON, MAN. -- Two former Manitoba soldiers have been sentenced to 18 months in jail for child pornography.

Comments

  1. by avatar Heavy_Metal
    Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:32 am
    and they only got 18 months....JOKE!!

  2. by avatar PENATRATOR
    Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:53 pm
    Would this make headline news if they worked for GM?

  3. by avatar commanderkai
    Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:06 pm
    "PENATRATOR" said
    Would this make headline news if they worked for GM?


    Eh, that's an unfair criticism, since if it was a coach/teacher/police officer/etc they usually reveal his job. Catching any predator, no matter what their profession is, is a good thing.

  4. by avatar Heavy_Metal
    Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:17 pm
    "commanderkai" said
    Would this make headline news if they worked for GM?


    Eh, that's an unfair criticism, since if it was a coach/teacher/police officer/etc they usually reveal his job. Catching any predator, no matter what their profession is, is a good thing.

    ...not a criticism, just a stupid f*cking question, these guys are perverts penatator...it only makes it worse that they were in the military....don't try to defend them because you wear the uniform too.

  5. by roger-roger
    Mon Dec 01, 2008 2:05 pm
    Being a former soldier should not have any bearing. It would be different if they were priests, teachers or police.

  6. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Mon Dec 01, 2008 2:25 pm
    These two peds will likely just get a slap on the wrist, be told to enter a program and be labelled 'cured'.

  7. by avatar commanderkai
    Mon Dec 01, 2008 2:48 pm
    "Eisensapper" said
    Being a former soldier should not have any bearing. It would be different if they were priests, teachers or police.


    Yeah, but they were using a government facility to hold their pornography, (I think the article stated they were on the base when this was all happening). Being in the military might also get you easier access to porn when let's say...they make a stop at Thailand, or another nation with lax porn control.

    I'm not saying the military is full of perverts, but the fact is that their position can have put them in access of children, be it in Afghanistan or somewhere else. It's called the news media, they're trying to get ratings.

  8. by roger-roger
    Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:35 pm
    Just because they were on a base does not mean they used one of the military computers for acquiring child porn, also saying because you are in the military will give you better access is ludicrous. Unless the persons profession has the accused in close contact with children, it should not be mentioned. This is not to protect the individual, but to keep the profession from being tarnished. I have enough to deal with being called a baby killer let alone being thought of as a possible pedophile.

  9. by roger-roger
    Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:41 pm
    As a side note, both of these guys were given very light sentences. They have to start raising the minimum jail sentence for all child abuse cases.

  10. by avatar Yogi
    Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:05 pm
    Both the actions, and the sentences are sickening.

  11. by avatar PENATRATOR
    Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:11 pm
    "lily" said
    Would this make headline news if they worked for GM?


    Of course not. We never hear about anyone else getting convicted of such a trivial issue as child porn. :roll:

    Give your head a shake. You should have been the first to condemn these guys, yet because they're fellow soldiers you're trying to what... make excuses? Defend them?

    Pretty pathetic.OK Lily, let me rephrase, would the headline read

    GM EMPLOYEE CHARGED FOR KIDDY PORN. Doubtful
    Defending them? Not in a million years, so those of you who suggest it, can go fuck yourselves
    Curios Lily, why should I be the first to condemn them? Why not you or someone else?
    Access to children in Afghanisan? lol, get some knowledge before making such retarded comments like that dude.
    ** Disclaimer for Lily, before you go cry to the mods (again) not all the responses here are directed to your comment

  12. by roger-roger
    Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:14 pm
    Pen I can see how he would be mistaken with the children in Afghanistan thing, almost daily I see pictures of some medic (or other female member) clutching a child like it is their own. That does give the impression that some military personel are deeply involved with the care of children in theater.

  13. by avatar commanderkai
    Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:23 pm
    "PENATRATOR" said
    OK Lily, let me rephrase, would the headline read

    GM EMPLOYEE CHARGED FOR KIDDY PORN. Doubtful


    But you see "Teacher charged for Kiddy porn" or "Priest" or "Coach" or "Police Officer" all the time in these cases. Saying a GM employee can mean anyone from the CEO to the janitor. Usually they give a quick detail about being a janitor or factory worker or executive before going into details in the article.

    Just because they were on a base does not mean they used one of the military computers for acquiring child porn, also saying because you are in the military will give you better access is ludicrous. Unless the persons profession has the accused in close contact with children, it should not be mentioned. This is not to protect the individual, but to keep the profession from being tarnished. I have enough to deal with being called a baby killer let alone being thought of as a possible pedophile.


    I apologize if I'm giving the impression that I believe as such. I was playing a very very tired version of Devil's advocate. I honestly think it was just for extra shock factor, reading the article again with coffee in my system. And any douchebag who would call you a predator from this is probably not even worth listening to in the first place.

  14. by roger-roger
    Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:29 pm
    I agree with you commander, it really boils down to the SUN trying to get people to pay attention to them. I havent seen any of this mentioned in most of the other news sites, but I havent been looking all that hard though.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3 4 5

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net