news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

DND restricts interviews during election campai

Canadian Content
20682news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

DND restricts interviews during election campaign


Military | 206830 hits | Sep 19 7:18 pm | Posted by: Hyack
26 Comment

The Defence Department has ordered staff to limit media interviews during the federal election campaign in a move critics charge is nothing more than an attempt to contain potentially damaging coverage of the Afghan mission.

Comments

  1. by avatar Reverend Blair
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 2:45 am
    Another Harper gag order, no doubt.

  2. by ridenrain
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 2:51 am
    The media restricts interviews anyways.
    Why give material to biased hacks who'll twist it around anyways. The CBC can always find some left wing professor anyways.

  3. by roger-roger
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 2:53 am
    No, its more like the officers and commanders have more important things to worry about then what they should and shouldnt say to the press. The same is done when ever a soldier is thrust infront of the camera. The CDS is one of the very few who should be talking to the press.

  4. by DerbyX
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 2:55 am
    "Reverend Blair" said
    Another Harper gag order, no doubt.


    I don't think so. The DND should be doing exactly this during an election. The military represents Canada, not a political party and they don't want a few voiced opinions speaking for the entire CF.

    Personally I thinks its not only prudent but a smart move because they don't know who will win.

    They all get a vote as Canadian citizens (my first ever cast vote was on a base) but as an organization uniformed officers shouldn't be giving political voiced interviews.

  5. by roger-roger
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 2:56 am
    This is also why military personnel are not allowed to join a political party.

  6. by avatar Reverend Blair
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:03 am
    Look around this board, Derby. The military represents the Conservative Party. Maybe they didn't used to, maybe they shouldn't, but the bias has been clear for quite some time.

    The interviews aren't about partisan political views though, they are about Afghanistan and how the war is going. If that war isn't going well, then we deserve to know that, election or not.

  7. by DerbyX
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:11 am
    "Reverend Blair" said
    Look around this board, Derby. The military represents the Conservative Party. Maybe they didn't used to, maybe they shouldn't, but the bias has been clear for quite some time.

    The interviews aren't about partisan political views though, they are about Afghanistan and how the war is going. If that war isn't going well, then we deserve to know that, election or not.


    Not Bootlegga or Scape but your point is well taken.

    Still my opinion is about uniformed members making a political endorsement. Giving interviews concerning their opinion of the war may violate uniformed regs.

    Would you want those interviews though? If they are all fluff support pieces then people will cry foul.

    Yes finding soldiers willingly to tell "our side" of the story is important but unless they are out of uniform how can you be sure they aren't being ordered to give slanted interviews?

  8. by avatar EyeBrock
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:23 am
    I don't think you'll find too many Police Officers airing their political views during the election either, even though most of them are traditionally Tories.

    The military and police have always attracted people who are more conservative in their political views than say teachers or nurses.

    It's horses for courses really.
    Do the job and keep personal political views out of it, that goes for cops and soldiers and that's the way it should be.
    Now get us on a forum and we will tell you what we think!

  9. by DerbyX
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:26 am
    "EyeBrock" said
    I don't think you'll find too many Police Officers airing their political views during the election either, even though most of them are traditionally Tories.

    The military and police have always attracted people who are more conservative in their political views than say teachers or nurses.

    It's horses for courses really.
    Do the job and keep personal political views out of it, that goes for cops and soldiers and that's the way it should be.
    Now get us on a forum and we will tell you what we think!


    Even when we could care less. :lol: j/k

  10. by roger-roger
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:33 am
    :roll:

  11. by DerbyX
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:37 am
    "Eisensapper" said
    :roll:


    Did you understand what :lol: j/k means?

  12. by roger-roger
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:39 am
    I can till roll my eyes at a lame joke :P

  13. by DerbyX
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:42 am
    "Eisensapper" said
    I can till roll my eyes at a lame joke :P


    ahhhh. :D

  14. by avatar Reverend Blair
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:25 am
    Still my opinion is about uniformed members making a political endorsement. Giving interviews concerning their opinion of the war may violate uniformed regs.

    Would you want those interviews though? If they are all fluff support pieces then people will cry foul.

    Yes finding soldiers willingly to tell "our side" of the story is important but unless they are out of uniform how can you be sure they aren't being ordered to give slanted interviews?


    Oh, the fluff pieces will keep on coming.

    Uniformed staff know damned well they aren't allowed to make political statements, although they seem to feel free to break that rule when they have the anonymity of the internet to protect them.

    The military also doesn't let their people speak to the press about anything without clearance. The interviews are already slanted.

    What this gag order does is allow the senior staff to dodge questions asked by the press regarding things that have been revealed through access to information requests and so on. Now they can just say they aren't allowed to answer because there's an election on.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • Eisensapper Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:40 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net