news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Canadian troop numbers in Afghanistan could inc

Canadian Content
20801news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Canadian troop numbers in Afghanistan could increase: Emerson


Military | 208002 hits | Jul 26 6:21 pm | Posted by: WDHIII
47 Comment

Canada may expand its troop commitment in Afghanistan by almost 10 per cent in order to service the helicopters about to be deployed to the region, Foreign Affairs Minister David Emerson indicated Saturday.

Comments

  1. by avatar cheryl08
    Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:48 am
    I understand that with NATO comes specific obligation revolving helping the Americans at war. But I don't see how this is going to help the deficit that the cons have going especially with corporate tax cuts.

    Most investments that are made within the country often yield some kind of revenue in the end to offset the expenditures.
    However, investing 50 million dollars and 200 Canadian lives to the war in Afghanistan just seems like wasted money (in terms of the fact that it's not going to aid Canada's economy or benefit citizens). Money that Harper doesn't have.

  2. by Anonymous
    Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:50 am
    Chretien shouldn't have sent them there in the first place :P

  3. by avatar saturn_656
    Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:53 am
    "cheryl08" said
    However, investing 50 million dollars and 200 Canadian lives to the war in Afghanistan just seems like wasted money (in terms of the fact that it's not going to aid Canada's economy or benefit citizens). Money that Harper doesn't have.


    Would you also support scrapping our Foreign Aid program? I mean we spend millions and the return for Canada is dubious at best...

  4. by avatar cheryl08
    Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:00 am

    Would you also support scrapping our Foreign Aid program? I mean we spend millions and the return for Canada is dubious at best...


    Just saying, its not the best move finance-wise.

  5. by avatar saturn_656
    Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:05 am
    "cheryl08" said

    Would you also support scrapping our Foreign Aid program? I mean we spend millions and the return for Canada is dubious at best...


    Just saying, its not the best move finance-wise.


    The helicopter deployment will make Canadian troops safer... and that is of greater interest and concern to Canada than Foreign Aid IMO.

    Just saying... if we want to save cash lets cut back on non-critical expenditures first.

  6. by ridenrain
    Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:34 am
    "cheryl08" said
    I understand that with NATO comes specific obligation revolving helping the Americans at war. But I don't see how this is going to help the deficit that the cons have going especially with corporate tax cuts.

    Most investments that are made within the country often yield some kind of revenue in the end to offset the expenditures.
    However, investing 50 million dollars and 200 Canadian lives to the war in Afghanistan just seems like wasted money (in terms of the fact that it's not going to aid Canada's economy or benefit citizens). Money that Harper doesn't have.


    I find you're understanding of NATO offensive and isnulting. Are we now simply a mercenary group twho's actions are dictated by the "bottom line"?

    If this is what you believe, then I'd like you to tell us all the monitary profit we gained from our African or Chinese aid. With all this talk of money, you're sounding like an American there. :D

  7. by avatar cheryl08
    Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:41 am

    I find you're understanding of NATO offensive and isnulting. Are we now simply a mercenary group twho's actions are dictated by the "bottom line"?


    sorry I didn't start to waste my time outlining NATO policies....clearly i was trying to make a point...its not the most financially-wise thing to do. Doesn't seem like foreign affairs and economic strategies are on the same page

  8. by ridenrain
    Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:45 am
    "cheryl08" said
    Doesn't seem like foreign affairs and economic strategies are on the same page


    Are they ever?

    For example:
    We've been giving poor Chinese farmers about $60k since the great starvation of the 60's. No one can tell me why or when it will end but it dosen't sound like sound fiscal management to me.

  9. by Anonymous
    Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:46 am
    "cheryl08" said
    I understand that with NATO comes specific obligation revolving helping the Americans at war.




    sounds like the start of another anti-American rant.

  10. by avatar cheryl08
    Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:50 am
    "mtbr" said
    I understand that with NATO comes specific obligation revolving helping the Americans at war.




    sounds like the start of another anti-American rant.

    Without getting into a debate....there are plenty of reasons why people should be anti-American since the Bush Administration took office

  11. by ridenrain
    Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:51 am
    This is stupid. Their talking about adding about 250 more troops to our 2500 already there. Since no liberal has any family or friends in the forces, their opinion is purely based on politics. If the troops themselves start to push back and stop volunteering, I'll definately take notice. Till then, this is just BS politics.

  12. by avatar Scape
    Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:58 am
    Good to see them go. We need the Chinook support.

  13. by Demian_164
    Sun Jul 27, 2008 7:05 am
    This is unreal. You do not support canadian troops in afganistan, keeping youre liberal dream of equal rights for all safe in a foreign country for economic issues, yet its ok for canadian tax dollars to aimlessly go into foreign nations? I see you are a liberal. Is a "green shift" in the best economic interests of this country?. The thing I usually understand about liberals is that they have no knowledge of economics whatsoever. If they did, they would not be liberal. You're statements are moronic at best.

  14. by stokes
    Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:22 am
    Heres the thing that bothers me about people going on about money:

    We are there until 2011 it was voted on and approved, so why send our troops what they need to get the job done? What is the problem here...we need airlift capability..we need UAV's...all of this will go to ensure that fewer of our troops are placed in Harms way. Lets do the job to the best of our ability until our commitment is over. That is the Canadian way and even though some of you may disagree it has been that way since day one.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3 4

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • WDHIII Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:25 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net