news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Navy's gas pains

Canadian Content
20696news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Navy's gas pains


Military | 206939 hits | Jun 09 10:18 am | Posted by: Hyack
5 Comment

MONTREAL -- Ballooning fuel prices and recruitment problems kept Canadian navy vessels docked for much of last year, Sun Media has learned.

Comments

  1. by avatar bootlegga
    Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:15 pm
    What?!? I thought Harper loved the CF...why isn't he giving them enough funding to train and patrol?

  2. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Mon Jun 09, 2008 10:01 pm
    81 Day's at sea. You gotta be kidding.

    It's certainly a far cry from the 265 days away from home port training squadron did back in the 70's. Although that'd be about the amount of time 2 Squadron did during the same period.

    How the hell are they planning on training and keeping people current if they aren't at sea?

    Given the fuel bills, it would appear that the three remaining Tribals will soon become artificial reefs. I guess even running on their cruise engines it's still much more expensive when compared to the diesels in the CPF's.

  3. by avatar uwish
    Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:23 pm
    it is no where near that bad. The problem with those stats they used is they took EVERY commissioned ship in the CF and then took the total hours and divided. It doesn't work that way.

    Those 12 frigates, 2 destroyers are almost at sea constantly and are amoung the highest sea hour vessels of any nato fleet.

    They are just skewing the numbers.

  4. by avatar bootlegga
    Tue Jun 10, 2008 3:55 pm
    "uwish" said
    it is no where near that bad. The problem with those stats they used is they took EVERY commissioned ship in the CF and then took the total hours and divided. It doesn't work that way.

    Those 12 frigates, 2 destroyers are almost at sea constantly and are amoung the highest sea hour vessels of any nato fleet.

    They are just skewing the numbers.


    Skewing the numbers? It specifically says;


    The 34 vessels deployed on Canada's East and West coasts, on average, spent only 81 days at sea in 2007, according to documents obtained by Sun Media through the Access to Information Act.


    Even the busiest ship was at sea for 179 days...freakinoldguy said he used to be away 265...that's 86 days (almost 3 months) less deployment than we used to under that evil commie Trudeau. And four other frigates spent only about 100 days at sea (a little over three months). That's a far cry from what it used to be.

    And remember, this was based on a period of 2005 - 2007, so that over two years, not one.

    To me, the most disturbing is that both the AORs were only at sea for about two months in a two year span. They are critical to maintaining our blue water capability and they spent only two months at sea?

    This tells me recruiting and fuel should be top priorities. Either Mackay needs to get a real increase in defence spending (instead of the same $1 billion the Liberals were adding every year), or we need to slow down purchases to maintain our skills.

  5. by avatar uwish
    Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:09 pm
    my biggest point here which you missed, is the Navy only has 34 vessels and almost one third are in dry dock!

    Hard to be deployed when in dry dock no?

    so they said ALL 34 vessels averaged 2754 days at sea a year. But there are only 20 to 23 are in service. The rest are in dry dock

    hence that means if there are 23 vessels truly in service it is 119.7 days at sea for each on of them.

    That is a pretty hefty deployment schedule basically 4 months a year. Then factor in that out of those 23 includes the coastal defence vessels (12 of them) which are primarily used by the Naval reserve.

    what is more scary is we only have about 23 navy ships anywhere doing anything!



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • bootlegga Mon Jun 09, 2008 12:54 pm
  • allan_17 Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:08 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net