news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Global warming's effects widespread, study find

Canadian Content
20655news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Global warming's effects widespread, study finds


World | 206534 hits | May 15 11:58 am | Posted by: Hyack
11 Comment

A vast array of physical and biological systems -- from polar bears in the Arctic to tiny krill in the Southern Ocean -- are showing the effect of the world's rising temperature, say scientists who analyzed more than 30,000 sets of data stretching back t

Comments

  1. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Thu May 15, 2008 7:12 pm
    Wow...that's a lot of effects from global warming. They missed one though. Apparently global warming killed the Loch Ness monster.

    Bogus pseudo-science.

  2. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Thu May 15, 2008 7:41 pm
    Even if the world collectively managed to freeze greenhouse-gas emissions at current levels, scientists say the climate is already "committed" to significant warming for hundreds of years to come.


    Uhm, so if we can't do anything about it why do these idiots want us to do something about it? :roll:

  3. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Thu May 15, 2008 8:55 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    Even if the world collectively managed to freeze greenhouse-gas emissions at current levels, scientists say the climate is already "committed" to significant warming for hundreds of years to come.


    Uhm, so if we can't do anything about it why do these idiots want us to do something about it? :roll:


    Just because, that's why. Didn't you read the "Scientists say" part? You're not supposed to ask any questions after that. Just substitute the word priests for Scientists, and it becomes clearer. Don't make the mistake of thinking scientists means all scientists though. We're only talking about the scientists who "say".

    I prefer the original text myself. It goes something like, "and man ate of the apple of knowledge, and he knew sin". So see if you know stuff, and you do stuff with that knowledge, you're bad. It's OK though, because if you buy indulgences (carbon offsets) from the church of Gore, or Kyoto, or whatever "scientists say" you can be forgiven.

  4. by avatar PluggyRug
    Thu May 15, 2008 9:02 pm
    The climate system is "a noisy, chaotic system and there is a lot of natural variation," says Zwiers, cautioning against reading too much into the cold spell in Canada.



    The climate system is "a noisy, chaotic system and there is a lot of natural variation," says Zwiers, cautioning against reading too much into the spell in (choose location).

    There now...fixed.

  5. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Thu May 15, 2008 11:04 pm
    The study is not without its limitations, says Zwiers. It would be better to have evidence stretching back 50 to 100 years. But he says the new study "largely overcomes the sampling limitations because of the sheer number of changes" included in the assessment


    Once again a scienctist takes the path of least resistance, to achieve the outcome that they want.

    If they have no evidence past 50 years ago, maybe they should ask somebody who was around then, what the weather was like. Duhh


    This method is just as scientific as lumping every climate event into a group and saying that because there were so many, it's "likely" human caused.

  6. by avatar travior
    Thu May 15, 2008 11:24 pm
    Wouldn't the term "Global Warming" imply global aka widespread effects? Hmmmm.... Must have been a government sponsored study :)

  7. by avatar dino_bobba_renno
    Thu May 15, 2008 11:48 pm
    "N_Fiddledog" said
    Wow...that's a lot of effects from global warming. They missed one though. Apparently global warming killed the Loch Ness monster.

    Bogus pseudo-science.


    8O Not the Loch Ness monster too! ROTFL

    I think we can safely add the following to the list as well: Cancer, Al Gores hair loss, bread turning stail, strippers falling off poles, bad breath in the morning, Saraha Jessica Parker, the death of Captian America, not being able to fly a kite on a perfect day with out wind, lack of global peace, and just to be on the safe side we could also add the taste of American beer.

    Yes people these are all cause by global warming and if you try to deny it I will call you a .. denier and say your in denial. So please don't try to argue because you'll simply be emitting more CO2 and aggravating the problem.

  8. by ManifestDestiny
    Fri May 16, 2008 12:13 am
    the article forgot to mention the sky is also gonna fall if we dont apease the Sun god. Al gore has his phone number

  9. by ManifestDestiny
    Fri May 16, 2008 12:16 am
    and thats not all of it that they forgot Obesity helps global warming also!!!!!!

    wait till you see this

  10. by avatar Brenda
    Fri May 16, 2008 12:20 am
    "N_Fiddledog" said
    Wow...that's a lot of effects from global warming. They missed one though. Apparently global warming killed the Loch Ness monster.

    Bogus pseudo-science.

    8O 8O

    What about Ogopogo?? Please, tell me Ogopogo still swims around!

  11. by avatar Hyack
    Fri May 16, 2008 12:27 am
    "Brenda" said
    Wow...that's a lot of effects from global warming. They missed one though. Apparently global warming killed the Loch Ness monster.

    Bogus pseudo-science.

    8O 8O

    What about Ogopogo?? Please, tell me Ogopogo still swims around!

    Sorry Brenda........sure was tasty tho......




view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • kitty Thu May 15, 2008 11:07 am
  • WDHIII Thu May 15, 2008 11:19 am
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net