The liberal facists will be in denial citing North Americans pollute more per individual and not acknowledge it is a nation's total global CO2 emissions that count and not per individual!
Not to mention this is proof that we all need the carbon trading market so we can send money to China so they can buy more submarine bunkers.. oops, I mean smokestack scrubbers.
CO2 is not a problem and there is no evidence to indicate it is but when it rains vinegar....."Houston we have a problem."
With all the time and resources wasted on this CO2 snipe hunt at the expense of neglecting genuine, proven pollution for a political agenda is the problem.
China/India has been the recurring concern of the elements the leftist brand deniers. In truth the leftists were/are the real deniers....and China/India have decisively proved that.
Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.
Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper.
"Wada" said Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.
Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper.
maybe you could lend us your bong since it's supposed to improve ones well being
"mtbr" said Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.
Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper.
maybe you could lend us your bong since it's supposed to improve ones well being
If I thought it would improve your commentary I might.
"Wada" said Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.
Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper.
maybe you could lend us your bong since it's supposed to improve ones well being
If I thought it would improve your commentary I might.
"mtbr" said Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.
Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper.
maybe you could lend us your bong since it's supposed to improve ones well being
If I thought it would improve your commentary I might.
Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.
I would recommend breathing high concentrations of oxygen either...your comment is sophistry. There is no evidence that 100 times the level of CO2 is harmful to plants.....in fact our current levels of oxygen were provided by the accelerated growth of that long past era.
CO2 is not a polutant at many times the current concentrations. There is no evidence of climate forcing other than some tofu eaters wet dream. There is no doubt at this point that SOX/NOX is not harmful.
The evil USA did not sign and according to a German minister of enviorment, thats why Katrina and Rita hit the gulf coast
With all the time and resources wasted on this CO2 snipe hunt at the expense of neglecting genuine, proven pollution for a political agenda is the problem.
China/India has been the recurring concern of the elements the leftist brand deniers. In truth the leftists were/are the real deniers....and China/India have decisively proved that.
"Carbon dioxide is a not a pollutant"
...it is as natural as oxygen or hydrogen... Plants require CO2...!!!!
The club of Rome wins, they now have their much desired air tax they have been pushing for since the 1960's....
Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper.
Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.
Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper.
maybe you could lend us your bong since it's supposed to improve ones well being
Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.
Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper.
maybe you could lend us your bong since it's supposed to improve ones well being
If I thought it would improve your commentary I might.
Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.
Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper.
maybe you could lend us your bong since it's supposed to improve ones well being
If I thought it would improve your commentary I might.
at least your honest...now go take another hit.
Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.
Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper.
maybe you could lend us your bong since it's supposed to improve ones well being
If I thought it would improve your commentary I might.
at least your honest...now go take another hit.
And what? Get accused of Bogarting!
I would recommend breathing high concentrations of oxygen either...your comment is sophistry. There is no evidence that 100 times the level of CO2 is harmful to plants.....in fact our current levels of oxygen were provided by the accelerated growth of that long past era.
CO2 is not a polutant at many times the current concentrations. There is no evidence of climate forcing other than some tofu eaters wet dream. There is no doubt at this point that SOX/NOX is not harmful.