news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Pollution From Chinese Coal Casts a Global Shad

Canadian Content
20652news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Pollution From Chinese Coal Casts a Global Shadow


Environmental | 206520 hits | May 03 7:10 pm | Posted by: stemmer
43 Comment

Comments

  1. by avatar stemmer
    Sat May 03, 2008 6:15 am
    The liberal facists will be in denial citing North Americans pollute more per individual and not acknowledge it is a nation's total global CO2 emissions that count and not per individual!

  2. by ridenrain
    Sun May 04, 2008 2:19 am
    Not to mention this is proof that we all need the carbon trading market so we can send money to China so they can buy more submarine bunkers.. oops, I mean smokestack scrubbers.

  3. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Sun May 04, 2008 2:51 am
    if China and India were to suddenly disappear, so too would most of the world's ecological problems.

  4. by avatar stemmer
    Mon May 05, 2008 12:05 pm
    But the liberal fascists will tell you it's all the problem of the USA...!!!

  5. by ManifestDestiny
    Mon May 05, 2008 12:21 pm
    but I dont get it China signed Kyoto they are not a problem :roll:

    The evil USA did not sign and according to a German minister of enviorment, thats why Katrina and Rita hit the gulf coast 8O

  6. by avatar Wada
    Mon May 05, 2008 12:27 pm
    Yah but Sasquatch and others say CO2 is not a problem so this article is bogus. :wink:

  7. by sasquatch2
    Mon May 05, 2008 2:36 pm
    CO2 is not a problem and there is no evidence to indicate it is but when it rains vinegar....."Houston we have a problem."

    With all the time and resources wasted on this CO2 snipe hunt at the expense of neglecting genuine, proven pollution for a political agenda is the problem.

    China/India has been the recurring concern of the elements the leftist brand deniers. In truth the leftists were/are the real deniers....and China/India have decisively proved that.

  8. by avatar stemmer
    Mon May 05, 2008 3:00 pm
    I wish the fascist liberals would wrap their feeble minds around this...

    "Carbon dioxide is a not a pollutant"

    ...it is as natural as oxygen or hydrogen... Plants require CO2...!!!!


    The club of Rome wins, they now have their much desired air tax they have been pushing for since the 1960's....

  9. by avatar Wada
    Mon May 05, 2008 3:19 pm
    Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.

    Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper. :idea:

  10. by Anonymous
    Mon May 05, 2008 3:23 pm
    "Wada" said
    Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.

    Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper. :idea:



    maybe you could lend us your bong since it's supposed to improve ones well being :P

  11. by avatar Wada
    Mon May 05, 2008 3:32 pm
    "mtbr" said
    Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.

    Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper. :idea:



    maybe you could lend us your bong since it's supposed to improve ones well being :P

    If I thought it would improve your commentary I might. :wink:

  12. by Anonymous
    Mon May 05, 2008 3:41 pm
    "Wada" said
    Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.

    Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper. :idea:



    maybe you could lend us your bong since it's supposed to improve ones well being :P

    If I thought it would improve your commentary I might. :wink:

    at least your honest...now go take another hit.

  13. by avatar Wada
    Mon May 05, 2008 3:44 pm
    "mtbr" said
    Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.

    Generally balance is an inner ear thing but with the Cons it's a problem that goes a wee bit deeper. :idea:



    maybe you could lend us your bong since it's supposed to improve ones well being :P

    If I thought it would improve your commentary I might. :wink:

    at least your honest...now go take another hit.

    And what? Get accused of Bogarting! :roll:

  14. by sasquatch2
    Mon May 05, 2008 3:59 pm
    Wada

    Try breathing CO2. Sure plants need CO2 and killing vast ammounts of plant life while adding more and more CO2 to the atmosphere is ok how. Remember those plants provide us with the oxygen WE NEED.


    I would recommend breathing high concentrations of oxygen either...your comment is sophistry. There is no evidence that 100 times the level of CO2 is harmful to plants.....in fact our current levels of oxygen were provided by the accelerated growth of that long past era.

    CO2 is not a polutant at many times the current concentrations. There is no evidence of climate forcing other than some tofu eaters wet dream. There is no doubt at this point that SOX/NOX is not harmful.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net