Apperantly he was found by a local hunter who had offered his assistance and was turned down by the RCMP. They sure don't help themselves out very much.
"Normalguy" said All fine and well, now who'll take odds with me that:
a. The guy who caught him gets charged, tried and fried by a Trudeauesque sh*tpump of lawyer/judge for:
(1) assault;
(2) agravated assault;
(3) forceable convinement; and
(4) any other trumped up charge cause "We can't have citizens acting on their own!"
(b) his dog is put down as a public menace (funny cause we won't put the purp down)
Nice talk about just being a suspect..
Homo praesumitur bonus donec probetur malus - One is innocent until proven guilty Homo proponit, sed Deus disponit - Man proposes, but God disposes
That waste wil burn, just when is the question
Sorry, can't take those odds with you....bit stretched
But let's try to focus on the subject at hand....convicting & sentencing whomever is guilty of this awful crime towards those three babies Not whether the guy who found him is a hunter or tracker, totally irrelevant....he found him and he is in custody and for those of us who live in and around Merritt, can feel a bit more at ease knowing this.
A hunter, huh?
Apparently not a very good one......
That makes him a good tracker... not a good hunter.
You sayin he should have shot him?
(fine with me,
That makes him a good tracker... not a good hunter.
That makes him a good tracker... not a good hunter.
You sayin he should have shot him?
(fine with me,
That makes him a good tracker... not a good hunter.
You sayin he should have shot him?
(fine with me,
Let's also keep in mind he has been vanished for 10 days, while his kids were murdered. The mother might have needed him if he didn't kill them...
Sorry, no sympathy from me for this scary man...
That makes him a good tracker... not a good hunter.
You sayin he should have shot him?
(fine with me,
Bleeding heart Con.
a. The guy who caught him gets charged, tried and fried by a Trudeauesque sh*tpump of lawyer/judge for:
(1) assault;
(2) agravated assault;
(3) forceable convinement; and
(4) any other trumped up charge cause "We can't have citizens acting on their own!"
(b) his dog is put down as a public menace (funny cause we won't put the purp down)
Nice talk about just being a suspect..
Homo praesumitur bonus donec probetur malus - One is innocent until proven guilty
Homo proponit, sed Deus disponit - Man proposes, but God disposes
That waste wil burn, just when is the question
All fine and well, now who'll take odds with me that:
a. The guy who caught him gets charged, tried and fried by a Trudeauesque sh*tpump of lawyer/judge for:
(1) assault;
(2) agravated assault;
(3) forceable convinement; and
(4) any other trumped up charge cause "We can't have citizens acting on their own!"
(b) his dog is put down as a public menace (funny cause we won't put the purp down)
Nice talk about just being a suspect..
Homo praesumitur bonus donec probetur malus - One is innocent until proven guilty
Homo proponit, sed Deus disponit - Man proposes, but God disposes
That waste wil burn, just when is the question
Sorry, can't take those odds with you....bit stretched
But let's try to focus on the subject at hand....convicting & sentencing whomever is guilty of this awful crime towards those three babies