
Advanced ground and space-based telescopes are discovering new planets around other stars almost daily, but an environmental scientist from England believes that even if some of those planets turn out to be Earth-like, the odds are very low they'll have
This article just makes it sound like, just finding other life forms means nothing. That its all about finding other intelligence.
Hell....I'd be happy just finding some intelligence in THESE forums...
You've got that one right. Stupidity seems to have become a virtue, on this forum and in society in general. The ability for critical thought is all but gone. Sad actually...
My position is that adbvanced life would originate in an oxygen environment and be carbon based. An ozygen atmosphere is as necessary as the ability to grasp and use tools----without oxygen there can be no harnessing of fire to work metal----sort of basic. What that advanced life would resemble??????primates were naturals due to their agility.....elephants are not successful at climbing ladders....and so on.
Carl Sagan, in his book 'Cosmos' had theorized a wide variety of life. Silicon and Carbon are chemically similar, so silicon based life is just as possible as carbon based. Silicon is also very plentiful on Earth.
They wouldn't necessarily evolve as we have, needing oxygen perhaps they could metabolize methane or even hydrogen sulfide! Copper and Iron are also chemically similar, so their blood may be copper based, rather than our iron based. Horseshoe crab's blood is copper based.
Earth's gravity and atmospheric temperature range affected our evolution. How would something evolve on a gas giant, with no solid surfaces?
Because we evolved the way we did, doesn't mean all life has to. Why does 'life' have to mean 'advanced'?