news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Charges laid against the captain and chief offi

Canadian Content
20643news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Charges laid against the captain and chief officer of the Farley Mowat


Misc CDN | 206404 hits | Apr 05 2:50 pm | Posted by: Hyack
4 Comment

HALIFAX - The captain and first officer of the Farley Mowat have been charged with violating Canadian fisheries laws, stemming from a high-seas collision between the anti-sealing vessel and a coast guard icebreaker last weekend.

Comments

  1. by avatar saturn_656
    Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:46 pm
    "There's no legal validity in these charges and if they do try to storm the vessel and arrest the officers, I think it will provoke an international incident. In fact it would be taken as an act of war."

    Paul Watson should really ask the Spanish if Canadians give two shits about provoking an incident when you are screwing around with economic activity in Canadian waters.

  2. by avatar Loader
    Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:45 pm
    "saturn_656" said
    Paul Watson should really ask the Spanish if Canadians give two shits about provoking an incident when you are screwing around with economic activity in Canadian waters.


    Agreed, Canada set a precedent in 2000 when we boarded the GTS Katie. It was a US owned, Russian Captained freighter flying the flag of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, in international waters, to get our military equipment back after the company tried to extort more money by refusing to dock and unload. After Watson's comments comparing the dead sealers to cigarette smoking apes with a clubs, I think there would be a lot of support for Canada to board and hold the Farley until after the hunt is done.

  3. by sasquatch2
    Mon Apr 07, 2008 5:22 pm
    Loader

    saturn_656
    Paul Watson should really ask the Spanish if Canadians give two shits about provoking an incident when you are screwing around with economic activity in Canadian waters.



    Agreed, Canada set a precedent in 2000 when we boarded the GTS Katie. It was a US owned, Russian Captained freighter flying the flag of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, in international waters, to get our military equipment back after the company tried to extort more money by refusing to dock and unload. After Watson's comments comparing the dead sealers to cigarette smoking apes with a clubs, I think there would be a lot of support for Canada to board and hold the Farley until after the hunt is done.

    There is a major difference. The "Farley Mowat" has crossed the line and become an outlaw/pirate ship. The likelyhood for a boarding/impoundment would be admitted by the left-side of the spectrum is that this is an issue which would advance the Tory's political fortunes in Atlantic Canada.

  4. by avatar QBall
    Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:35 pm
    "There's no legal validity in these charges and if they do try to storm the vessel and arrest the officers, I think it will provoke an international incident. In fact it would be taken as an act of war."


    Usually Canada asks the country of registration for permission to board the vessel as a courtesy (this happened with the GTS Katie). Since most of these countries are flags of convenience and really don't give a rat's ass about the ships that carry their flag they usually shrug and say, "Whatever". I seriously doubt the Netherlands would: a) say no; b) care; c) would raise any sort of issue considering their are two members of the crew who are wanted; d) acts were committed, and the vessel remains, in Canadian waters.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • RUEZ Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:33 pm
  • Wullu Sat Apr 05, 2008 4:37 pm
  • WDHIII Sat Apr 05, 2008 4:54 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net