news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Harper wonders if Canadians really get Afghanis

Canadian Content
20783news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Harper wonders if Canadians really get Afghanistan


World | 207819 hits | Dec 26 11:47 am | Posted by: Hyack
32 Comment

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he is uncertain whether Canadians at large understand the importance of remaining involved in Afghanistan.

Comments

  1. by Anonymous
    Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:19 am
    OK, We get Afganistan. We're there to support American foriegn policy and ensure Harper can gain a favorite ot two with Bush.

  2. by avatar TheQuietKidd
    Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:42 pm
    Yes, that's exactly why our Liberal government and the governments of many of our NATO allies decided to send troops... it has nothing to do with the millions of children who are now enrolled in schools, many of whom are girls. Or the ousting of a group of people who would have women condemned to a life of subservience. Or how about the cracking down on weapons and man power of a number of terrorist cells who could have been the next guy to fly a plane into a landmark near you?
    Nope, had nothing to do with that, fuckwad.

  3. by Anonymous
    Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:54 pm
    "TheQuietKidd" said
    Yes, that's exactly why our Liberal government and the governments of many of our NATO allies decided to send troops... it has nothing to do with the millions of children who are now enrolled in schools, many of whom are girls. Or the ousting of a group of people who would have women condemned to a life of subservience. Or how about the cracking down on weapons and man power of a number of terrorist cells who could have been the next guy to fly a plane into a landmark near you?
    Nope, had nothing to do with that, fuckwad.



    Liberals like to deny all of it!

  4. by avatar Bowley
    Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:41 am
    "TheQuietKidd" said
    Yes, that's exactly why our Liberal government and the governments of many of our NATO allies decided to send troops... it has nothing to do with the millions of children who are now enrolled in schools, many of whom are girls. Or the ousting of a group of people who would have women condemned to a life of subservience. Or how about the cracking down on weapons and man power of a number of terrorist cells who could have been the next guy to fly a plane into a landmark near you?
    Nope, had nothing to do with that, fuckwad.


    Actually probably not, Politics doesn't generally give a shit about such things....especially in shit hole countries. In fact, its almost like Afghanistan is just being used by the NATO countries to give many soldiers experience in dealing with insurgencies, similar to Nazi Germany supporting Nationalist Spain, but hey what do I know I'm just some guy on the internet.

  5. by avatar RUEZ
    Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:16 am
    "Anonymous" said
    OK, We get Afganistan. We're there to support American foriegn policy and ensure Harper can gain a favorite ot two with Bush.
    Maybe you could use your wisdom to explain to us how Harper is responsible for two previous Liberal governments sending troops to Afghanistan.

  6. by ridenrain
    Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:12 pm
    I thought Anonymous folks couldn't post.

  7. by Sargasso
    Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:23 pm
    Liberal or Conservative I really see very little difference.

  8. by ridenrain
    Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:32 pm
    The Conservatives have always supported the mission.

    The Liberals were in favor of this when they were in power, all the way back to 2002. Now, most of them are against it, saying that the mission changed.. it did. We're closer to winning.

  9. by avatar Elvis
    Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:47 pm
    Why is Canada involve in Afghanistan ???

    Well we are a small country which is the neighbor of the only hyper power on earth. This hyper power ask us to be involve in Afghanistan. Therefor we are there.

    Is this wrong ???? Well that's a political decision. In my opinion it is in our national interest to keep good relation with this particular country since we depend on it economically. So please don't play the humanitarian card on me.

    Pour les soldats du vingt-deuxième régiment, soyez sans pitié et revenez-nous en vie!

  10. by avatar TheQuietKidd
    Thu Dec 27, 2007 4:33 pm
    "Elvis" said
    Pour les soldats du vingt-deuxième régiment, soyez sans pitié et revenez-nous en vie!


    May all brave Canadians serving in foreign lands come home safe, no matter where they're from.

  11. by sasquatch2
    Thu Dec 27, 2007 5:15 pm
    TheQuietKidd
    Yes, that's exactly why our Liberal government and the governments of many of our NATO allies decided to send troops... it has nothing to do with the millions of children who are now enrolled in schools, many of whom are girls. Or the ousting of a group of people who would have women condemned to a life of subservience. Or how about the cracking down on weapons and man power of a number of terrorist cells who could have been the next guy to fly a plane into a landmark near you?
    Nope, had nothing to do with that, fuckwad.


    PDT_Armataz_01_34 R=UP

    You silver tongued devil you!

    That post makes me jealous as hell.

    Bowley
    ..........but hey what do I know I'm just some guy on the internet.


    How true......PDT_Armataz_01_40

  12. by ryan29
    Thu Dec 27, 2007 6:50 pm
    "RUEZ" said
    OK, We get Afganistan. We're there to support American foriegn policy and ensure Harper can gain a favorite ot two with Bush.
    Maybe you could use your wisdom to explain to us how Harper is responsible for two previous Liberal governments sending troops to Afghanistan.


    know thats whats you odd about the whole afghanistan debate and dions latest demands on this subject. it seems like the liberals have forgotten they were the ones who signed on to begin with . and seem to have forgot what mission was originally about and how unstable this part of the world is .

    but don't think alot of average canadians understand afghanistan or that part of the world in general , just not an area they are familar with or ever visited as tourists . only really seen it on the news and the coverage has been less than great .

  13. by avatar kenmore
    Thu Dec 27, 2007 8:42 pm
    The previous liberal governments sent troups to afghanistan as peace keepers and aids to helping rebuild.. it was Harper bowing to the bush administration that put our troups in combat... so what are we doing there? fighting for the good old USA! now they want to pull out.. go figure.... do Canadians understand why we are there.. poll shows margin of no we dont and should leave... the issue of this war, the issue of the environment and the sorry folks but no go on the tax breaks will bring him down .......... and out in the spring ....yeah!

  14. by ryan29
    Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:17 am
    "kenmore" said
    The previous liberal governments sent troups to afghanistan as peace keepers and aids to helping rebuild.. it was Harper bowing to the bush administration that put our troups in combat... so what are we doing there? fighting for the good old USA! now they want to pull out.. go figure.... do Canadians understand why we are there.. poll shows margin of no we dont and should leave... the issue of this war, the issue of the environment and the sorry folks but no go on the tax breaks will bring him down .......... and out in the spring ....yeah!



    as peacekeepers ? come on give me a break chretien sent them over there rate after 9/11 . it was clear they were going there for a sort of combat role at times .

    and polls well they can be used to claim lots of things against this mission and maybe some of the public doesn't agree with it but its really up to government and miltary to decide what to do there . not a few polls.
    its really up to the canadian parliament i guess , understand there will be another vote soon on this .



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • ridenrain Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:57 am
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net