news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Canadian military donates old C7 rifles to Afgh

Canadian Content
20816news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Canadian military donates old C7 rifles to Afghan National Army


Military | 208149 hits | Dec 23 4:05 pm | Posted by: Hyack
63 Comment

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - The Canadian military has agreed to donate 2,500 surplus C7 rifles to the Afghan National Army along with ammunition and training.

Comments

  1. by Anonymous
    Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:58 pm
    It's things like this that will let us leave earlier rather than later. I say donate/buy 25,000 not 2,500. But it's a good start!

  2. by sasquatch2
    Mon Dec 24, 2007 10:40 pm
    I have several comments:

    The AKM's are inferior to M16/C7s anyhoo. They lack range and accuracy. They never really were ever reliable and have a short life.....cheap crap....as a local gun dealer commented about 7.62/39..."cheap ammo for cheap guns."

    Thank's to years of neglect, when Canada first deployed to Afghanistan the CFs were short of C7's to arm the deployed troops and stripped the militia of their C7 inventory......leaving the militia training with sticks. The lads in Kitchener couldn't crank out new C7's fast enough.....sounds like they caught up.

  3. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:33 pm
    Where did you hear that?

  4. by sasquatch2
    Tue Dec 25, 2007 12:55 am
    From the militia guys hereabout hereabouts complaining bitterly about loosing their C7's and having to maneuver with sticks. I did some consulting for Excello----

  5. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Tue Dec 25, 2007 4:37 am
    I think they're feeding you a line of BS.

    The CF has more than adequate amounts of C7's. There's no need for a Reserve unit to lose weapons to a deploying Regular unit simply because the Regular unit has their own. The personal weapons in theatre are the troops regular personal weapon from here in Canada. They brought them there, they'll bring them home when they come home.

  6. by avatar SigPig
    Tue Dec 25, 2007 6:06 am
    now correct me if im wrong but doesnt mean surplus mean that they have reached the end of their effective service life for us? (i read somewhere that is about 20000 rounds till a 7 is finished). and doesnt that mean that the ANA is just getting a bunch of rifles that may or may not work better than their old ones??
    dont get me wrong...i think its a good idea, just curious about the quality of some of these rifles.

  7. by sasquatch2
    Tue Dec 25, 2007 7:54 am
    Apparently the reg force didn't have sufficient C7's to deploy. Support personnel only have weapons in a hot-zone perhaps. The militia playing with sticks and Excello got a rush order for many more.

    The new C7's are an improvement on the original. Yes the life expectancy of a C7 is 20,000 rds+. The "surplus C7's" are likely the old model and are very serviceable----likely better than a new colt M16. But then I am biased.

    The new order caused a delay on a project to rebuild M2's for the US Army.

  8. by avatar Tricks
    Tue Dec 25, 2007 8:56 am
    "sasquatch2" said
    The militia playing with sticks and Excello got a rush order for many more.
    What the hell is Excello?

  9. by sasquatch2
    Tue Dec 25, 2007 7:24 pm
    Excello is a light engineering firm in kitchener, Ontario, which among other things manufactures C7's for the Canadian Government.

    BTW, Tricks, you may be not aware but General Dynamics, Land Systems, having taken over the GM military facility at GM DIESEL, in North East London builds LAV's and STRYKERs. It's on Oxford Street east of Clark Road. Can't miss it.

  10. by avatar Tricks
    Tue Dec 25, 2007 8:28 pm
    Doesn't Colt Canada build the C-7? The colt factory in Canada would build it wouldn't it?

  11. by sasquatch2
    Tue Dec 25, 2007 8:49 pm
    Tricks

    Doesn't Colt Canada build the C-7? The colt factory in Canada would build it wouldn't it?


    Colt Canada??????

    Colt Defense LLC, a designer, developer and manufacturer of small arms for military and law enforcement agencies, announced today the completion of its of the Logistics & Defense Division, Diemaco, from Héroux-Devtek Inc. (TSX: HRX). The Diemaco business will now be operated as Colt Canada Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Colt.


    Colt's needed this to acquire the proprietary barrel manufacturing method---hammer forging.

    This is similar to Timberjack in Woodstock, On, a manufacturer/pioneer in forestry equipment. This was purchased from Timberland, the original company by Eaton/Yale.....then sold to Valmet of Finland.....which in turn sold it to Deere & CO (JOHN DEERE) who having acquired the rights to proprietary models closed the plant after a year or so and removed production to the US.

  12. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Wed Dec 26, 2007 12:45 am
    Every Regular Force soldier on reporting to their unit is assigned a personal weapon. They keep that weapon for the duration of the posting to that unit for their exclusive use, unless assigned a different type of weapon (i.e. C8 or C9). Each Regular Force unit keeps a surplus of personal weapons, to the point where they can issue up to 1.5 times their establishment. Doesn't matter the trade or the role. There is no requirement for a Reserve unit to give up their personal weapons to a Regular unit so that the Regular unit can deploy. They just don't need them. C7's are as common as dirt.

    Which unit was alledgedly playing with sticks? Never heard of this Excello. Diemaco made the C7's and sold it to Colt, unless this Excello supplies a component of some kind.

  13. by DerbyX
    Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:14 am
    "SprCForr" said
    Every Regular Force soldier on reporting to their unit is assigned a personal weapon. They keep that weapon for the duration of the posting to that unit for their exclusive use, unless assigned a different type of weapon (i.e. C8 or C9). Each Regular Force unit keeps a surplus of personal weapons, to the point where they can issue up to 1.5 times their establishment. Doesn't matter the trade or the role. There is no requirement for a Reserve unit to give up their personal weapons to a Regular unit so that the Regular unit can deploy. They just don't need them. C7's are as common as dirt.

    Which unit was alledgedly playing with sticks? Never heard of this Excello. Diemaco made the C7's and sold it to Colt, unless this Excello supplies a component of some kind.


    Me thinks yetiboy is just trolling in order to cast further aspersions on the party that sent them to Afghanistan somehow without weapons or that they took all the remaining weapons leaving units back home with sticks.

    There is no way any self-respecting unit would train with sticks unless it were part of a deliberate training program.

    Once again we see that truth is as foreign a concept to certain members as soap and mouthwash.

  14. by avatar Tricks
    Wed Dec 26, 2007 5:40 am
    "sasquatch2" said
    Tricks

    Doesn't Colt Canada build the C-7? The colt factory in Canada would build it wouldn't it?


    Colt Canada??????
    Yeah. Diemaco was bought by colt and renamed to Colt Canada.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3 4 5

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • WDHIII Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:21 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net