Some MPs began 'wittingly assisting' foreign state actors soon after their election, says a report released Monday, including sending confidential information to Indian officials.
55 Some elected officials, however, began wittingly assisting foreign state actors soon after their election. [*** Three sentences were deleted to remove injurious or privileged information. The sentences described examples of members of Parliament who worked to influence their colleagues on India’s behalf and proactively provided confidential information to Indian officials. ***]
And an additional note about it
[*** This paragraph was revised to remove injurious or privileged information. ***] The Committee notes a particularly concerning case of a then-member of Parliament maintaining a relationship with a foreign intelligence officer. According to CSIS, the member of Parliament sought to arrange a meeting in a foreign state with a senior intelligence official and also proactively provided the intelligence officer with information provided in confidence.
It will be interesting to hear more about this.
Edit: Another interesting part between 29 and 30
During the period under review, the primary perpetrators of repression against ethnocultural communities in Canada were the PRC, India, *** , Iran, *** and ***. 41 Observed transnational repression focused on fundamental rights and freedoms (e.g., freedom of expression), but did not directly target democratic institutions and processes.
Those *** are redactions because
Revisions were made to remove information the disclosure of which the Prime Minister believed would be injurious to national security, national defence or international relations or which constitutes solicitor-client privilege. Where information could simply be removed without affecting the readability of the document, the Committee noted the removal with three asterisks (***) in the text of this document.
It sounds like 3 friendly countries are engaging in Transnational repression
Transnational repression refers to the exertion of control of an ethnocultural community by a foreign state through monitoring, coercion, harassment, intimidation or violence.
'Accidents' happen. Would be a shame if it did but until a remedy is applied there is a pale upon the entire house. This is not tenable. What's next loyalty oaths?
Can alleged parliamentarian colluders face consequences? CSIS chief weighs in
“It’s not going to be (a) judicial process, it’s not going to be someone charged by a court of law, but it’s someone who may not be allowed to run, may not be allowed to sit in caucus.”
I'll take it! Musical chairs next election anyway...
Treason? Without a doubt. Best case is we can use this as a bait program to track the actions of outside actors. This has exposed a huge chink in our armor that must be redressed and moving on to the next hot topic isn't going to make this go away. There is a onus on the government to act and that extends to governments in waiting as well.
55 Some elected officials, however, began wittingly assisting foreign state actors soon after their election. [*** Three sentences were deleted to remove injurious or privileged information. The sentences described examples of members of Parliament who worked to influence their colleagues on India’s behalf and proactively provided confidential information to Indian officials. ***]
And an additional note about it
[*** This paragraph was revised to remove injurious or privileged information. ***] The Committee notes a particularly concerning case of a then-member of Parliament maintaining a relationship with a foreign intelligence officer. According to CSIS, the member of Parliament sought to arrange a meeting in a foreign state with a senior intelligence official and also proactively provided the intelligence officer with information provided in confidence.
It will be interesting to hear more about this.
Edit: Another interesting part between 29 and 30
During the period under review, the primary perpetrators of repression against ethnocultural communities in Canada were the PRC, India, *** , Iran, *** and ***. 41 Observed transnational repression focused on fundamental rights and freedoms (e.g., freedom of expression), but did not directly target democratic institutions and processes.
Those *** are redactions because
Revisions were made to remove information the disclosure of which the Prime Minister believed would be injurious to national security, national defence or international relations or which constitutes solicitor-client privilege. Where information could simply be removed without affecting the readability of the document, the Committee noted the removal with three asterisks (***) in the text of this document.
It sounds like 3 friendly countries are engaging in Transnational repression
Transnational repression refers to the exertion of control of an ethnocultural community by a foreign state through monitoring, coercion, harassment, intimidation or violence.
Yet another reason to think thrice before handing out secrecy classifications all willy nilly.
Sure seems odd that PP is willing to work with JT on passing reforms.
Security should be taken seriously.
I'll take it! Musical chairs next election anyway...
Treason? Without a doubt. Best case is we can use this as a bait program to track the actions of outside actors. This has exposed a huge chink in our armor that must be redressed and moving on to the next hot topic isn't going to make this go away. There is a onus on the government to act and that extends to governments in waiting as well.