 Hundreds more Catholic clergy sexually abused kids than thought: Illinois probeLaw & Order | 470 hits | May 23 4:59 pm | Posted by: DrCaleb Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
Well of course they should stop Royal Story time in other states.
If the autogynophiles didn't love showing off their taints & yambags to the unfortunate children who get taken by their delusional parents to the "family friendly" drag shows then they wouldn't get lumped in with the perverts of the clergy.
Don't want to be called a sicko? Then don't behave like one. Applies as much to the alleged "queens" as it does to the degenerates in the churches.
Speaking of which, is it still OK to call them pedophiles around here? Or, like the Scottish national police now does, is it the more tolerant, civilized, and like-totally trendy thing to now refer to them as "minor attracted persons"? Just looking to update my woke manual to reduce the number of obsolete terms, maybe you lads* can help me out with this.
* assuming "lads" is among your preferred words for identification
How about saying both are wrong and that kids everywhere should be off limits to every sicko out there looking for their thrills? Is that really so hard to do?
What has led you to believe that anyone around here would be revulsed at clergy attacking children, but look the other way at anyone else doing it? Not rhetorical.
Speaking of which, is it still OK to call them pedophiles around here? Or, like the Scottish national police now does, is it the more tolerant, civilized, and like-totally trendy thing to now refer to them as "minor attracted persons"? Just looking to update my woke manual to reduce the number of obsolete terms, maybe you lads* can help me out with this.
* assuming "lads" is among your preferred words for identification
See, there is yet another information point you have that is totally wrong.
“Police Scotland does not use the term Minor-Attracted Person to describe this type of offender and any suggestion otherwise completely misrepresents our position.
“The term referenced in a Police Scotland report in June 2022 was quoted from proposal documents for the establishment of the Horizon Project, a European consortium to tackle child sexual abuse and exploitation.
“At the first meeting of the consortium, in Warsaw in September 2022, Police Scotland officers successfully lobbied for the MAP term to be removed from recognised terminology used by more than 20 European partners.
“Our view was that the term was entirely unacceptable in describing someone either involved in sexual offending against children or who has indecent thoughts towards them.
https://www.scotland.police.uk/what-s-h ... ed-person/
Protip: If something makes you extremely angry, the relief is usually one google query away.
How about saying both are wrong and that kids everywhere should be off limits to every sicko out there looking for their thrills? Is that really so hard to do?
Agreed. I don't give a shit who the creep is or what they do for a living, anything involving the abuse of children is freaking criminal and they should be jailed for it.