Before Trump ended zero tolerance by executive order on June 20, 2018, over 2,800 children had been separated from their parents. As a result, some took months to reunite, and, in hundreds of cases, parents were deported from the U.S. without their childr
.Literally a White House conspiracy to abuse children. Someone tell QAnon they’ve got their guns pointed in the wrong direction.
Trump Cabinet officials voted in 2018 White House meeting to separate migrant children, say officials
Aug. 20, 2020, 3:15 PM EDT
WASHINGTON — In early May 2018, after weeks of phone calls and private meetings, 11 of the president's most senior advisers were called to the White House Situation Room, where they were asked, by a show-of-hands vote, to decide the fate of thousands of migrant parents and their children, according to two officials who were there.
President Donald Trump's senior adviser Stephen Miller led the meeting, and, according to the two officials, he was angry at what he saw as defiance by Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.
It had been nearly a month since Jeff Sessions, then the attorney general, had launched the Trump administration's "zero tolerance" policy, announcing that every immigrant who crossed the U.S. border illegally would be prosecuted, including parents with small children. But so far, U.S. border agents had not begun separating parents from their children to put the plan into action, and Miller, the architect of the administration's crackdown on undocumented immigrants, was furious about the delay.
Those invited included Sessions, Nielsen, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar and newly installed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, according to documents obtained by NBC News.
Nielsen told those at the meeting that there were simply not enough resources at DHS, nor at the other agencies that would be involved, to be able to separate parents, prosecute them for crossing the border and return them to their children in a timely manner, according to the two officials who were present. Without a swift process, the children would enter into the custody of Health and Human Services, which was already operating at near capacity.
Two officials involved in the planning of "zero tolerance" said the Justice Department acknowledged on multiple occasions that U.S. attorneys would not be able to prosecute all parents expeditiously, so sending children to HHS was the most likely outcome.
As Nielsen had said repeatedly to other officials in the weeks leading up to the meeting, according to two former officials, the process could get messy and children could get lost in an already clogged system.
Miller saw the separation of families not as an unfortunate byproduct but as a tool to deter more immigration. According to three former officials, he had devised plans that would have separated even more children. Miller, with the support of Sessions, advocated for separating all immigrant families, even those going through civil court proceedings, the former officials said.
While zero tolerance ultimately separated nearly 3,000 children from their parents, what Miller proposed would have separated 25,000 more, including those who legally presented themselves at ports of entry seeking asylum, according to Customs and Border Protection data from May and June 2018.
That plan never came to fruition, in large part because DHS officials had argued it would grind the immigration process to a halt. But after Sessions' announcement that all families entering illegally would be prosecuted, the onus had fallen on DHS to act.
At the meeting, Miller accused anyone opposing zero tolerance of being a lawbreaker and un-American, according to the two officials present.
"If we don't enforce this, it is the end of our country as we know it," Miller said, according to the two officials. It was not unusual for Miller to make claims like that, but this time he was adamant that the policy move forward, regardless of arguments about resources and logistics.
No one in the meeting made the case that separating families would be inhumane or immoral, the officials said. Any moral argument about immigration "fell on deaf ears" inside the White House, one of the officials said.
"Miller was tired of hearing about logistical problems," one of the officials said. "It was just 'Let's move forward and staff will figure this out.'"
Frustrated, Miller accused Nielsen of stalling and demanded a show of hands. Who was in favor of moving forward? he asked.
A sea of hands went up. Nielsen kept hers down. It was clear she had been outvoted, according to the officials.
In the days immediately following the meeting, Nielsen had a conversation with Kevin McAleenan, then the Customs and Border Patrol commissioner, in her office at the Ronald Reagan Building and then signed a memo instructing DHS personnel to prosecute all migrants crossing the border illegally, including parents arriving with their children.
Nielsen did so despite her stated reservations in the Situation Room and her having been warned in a legal memo by DHS General Counsel John Mitnick — which was also sent to her chief of staff at the time, Chad Wolf, who is now the acting secretary of DHS — that the decision would result in separation of families. Of the practice, Mitnick wrote, "a court could conclude that the separations are violative of the INA, Administrative Procedure Act, or the Fifth Amendment Due Process clause."
Less than two months later, Trump signed an executive order halting family separations and a federal judge in California ordered family reunifications on the grounds that the separated families' due process rights were violated.
At the time, no plan was in place to track the children who had been separated or to create a system to reunite thousands of separated families, according to the two former officials.
According to an invitation list obtained by NBC News, those expected to be in attendance at the meeting included: Sessions, Nielsen, Miller, Pompeo, Azar, Undersecretary of Defense John Rood, then-White House chief of staff John Kelly, White House deputy chief of staff Chris Liddell, then-White House counsel Don McGahn and Marc Short, who was then director of legislative affairs and is now chief of staff to Vice President Mike Pence.
Asked about the show-of-hands vote, Judd Deere, a White House spokesman, said, "This is absolutely not true and did not happen."
In response to a request for a comment about the meeting and the show of hands, HHS spokesman Michael Caputo said, "This never happened."
The State Department and DHS referred NBC News to the White House. Sessions, Nielsen, Kelly and Bolton did not respond to requests for comment. McGahn and Rood could not be reached for comment.
Before Trump ended zero tolerance by executive order on June 20, 2018, over 2,800 children had been separated from their parents. When a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to begin reuniting the families it had separated, it became clear that there was no method to track both parent and child as they moved through the system. As a result, some took months to reunite, and, in hundreds of cases, parents were deported from the U.S. without their children.
On May 4, Gary Tomasulo, who was then the senior director for border and transportation security on the National Security Council, sent an email to the deputies and lower-level staffers tasked with carrying out immigration policy, telling them that their bosses had agreed to the new zero tolerance prosecution and separation policy and that they needed to develop plans to support it.
At the time, some of the subordinates to the Cabinet secretaries who were responsible for carrying out zero tolerance had raised moral objections, according to a source familiar with the discussions.
In the email, obtained by NBC News, Tomasulo told the deputies and other subordinates that their bosses "acknowledged that there are no easy solutions, but remained committed to collectively do everything possible to develop innovative solutions that leverage the full resources, capabilities, and authorities of the U.S. government."
He went on to say, "I ask that if you are unable to participate in these meetings, the message of commitment and resolve expressed by our principals is communicated and internalized by those that represent your departments and agencies."
It's too bad that there's no natural justice that occurs to make sure that people get the death they deserve because Stephen Miller deserves to depart this mortal coil someday by having a length of piano wire wrapped around his throat and twisted so tight that his eyeballs pop out of his skull. He's the kind of person who would personally conduct another Wannsee Conference and not think twice about it.
The supporters are what they are and can't be fixed or cured. There's no point anymore in trying to get through to them because they won't listen at all. It is what it is. The perpetrators though, like Miller? The entire lot of them, except maybe for Mattis and McMaster, deserve a Nuremburg Trial for what they've done to America.
This is actually what pisses me off about the Dems, how they're so oblivious of the low-hanging but incredibly popular fruit just waiting to be picked that would increase their election chances greatly. Really, all the Dem platform should be comes down to two things:
1) reverse in any way possible EVERY single thing Trump has done 2) launch a full presidential commission into the activities of every single Trump appointee, the Trump family, and Trump himself, with a promise to prosecute them all to the maximum
Said it before, I'll say it again - getting rid of Trump is the only priority in this election. Smashing his wretched legacy to bits, and then doing whatever is needed to make sure it never happens again, is the second necessity. Everything else can wait.
The windows of the White House and the Secretarial offices are going to have to be left wide open for a long, long time to fully disperse the stench the current occupants are embedding into the walls and carpets. Full fumigation STAT!
"Thanos" said It's too bad that there's no natural justice that occurs to make sure that people get the death they deserve because Stephen Miller deserves to depart this mortal coil someday by having a length of piano wire wrapped around his throat and twisted so tight that his eyeballs pop out of his skull. He's the kind of person who would personally conduct another Wannsee Conference and not think twice about it.
I’ve called Stephen Miller young Eichmann for a while now and I stand by it. He is the kind of guy who gets off dreaming of genocide of the undesirables. Every last member of the Trump administration is going to either have to go to jail or have their head mounted on a like along the National Mall as examples of what happens to people like that.
After the Third Servile War and the defeat of Spartacus and his rebellious slaves, the Romans crucified the survivors and had them strung up along the Appian Way as an unequivocal statement: this is the price you pay when you go too far.
There can't be any pity or calls for civility this time. The GOP won't show any so the Dems can't either, no matter how much caterwauling their establishment members make over returning to "normal". There is no normal to return to. It's full tribal warfare and the tribe that wins can only concern themselves with their own agenda and retention of power because that's exactly the only thing that the other side cares about.
If Biden wins and Trump goes away they have a bigger problem coming up in 2024 anyway. The most likely candidate in my mind who'll step forward for the GOP will be Tom Cotton. He won't introduce anything attractive in terms of policy - the Republicans don't do "policy" any more anyway, unless you count increasing the flow of money from the poorest to the richest as some sort of a platform. The concern with Cotton is that he's basically an advocate of sending the serving military out into the streets to shoot other non-GOP Americans. In the parlance of Dungeons & Dragons, exchanging Trump for Cotton is basically getting rid of the chaotic evil candidate for a lawful evil one, and lawful evil is about a thousand times more dangerous than it's chaotic brethren. There wouldn't be an endless display of orgiastic fuckery under Cotton the way there's been under Trump. The dismantling of American foundations would proceed in a much more organized manner.
What Trump's done can conceivably be reversed. Under a much more thoughtful, deliberate, and diligent destroyer though, which is exactly what someone like Tom Cotton would be IMO? Shit, it wouldn't be similar to what the Third Reich had, it'd be much more like the comprehensive system of obliteration Stalin created. There is every valid reason to believe that the worst has yet to come.
I’ll point out that in the OP it says some staffers raised moral objections but ultimately fell in line and “followed orders” anyway. That isn’t a left-right issue or something limited to conservatives or Nazi die-hards, it’s unfortunately part of human nature.
People are kidding themselves if they’re thinking that horrible things can’t happen because the “good people” will refuse to cooperate with immoral orders. Most of them will fall in line one way or another.
Aug. 20, 2020, 3:15 PM EDT
WASHINGTON — In early May 2018, after weeks of phone calls and private meetings, 11 of the president's most senior advisers were called to the White House Situation Room, where they were asked, by a show-of-hands vote, to decide the fate of thousands of migrant parents and their children, according to two officials who were there.
President Donald Trump's senior adviser Stephen Miller led the meeting, and, according to the two officials, he was angry at what he saw as defiance by Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.
It had been nearly a month since Jeff Sessions, then the attorney general, had launched the Trump administration's "zero tolerance" policy, announcing that every immigrant who crossed the U.S. border illegally would be prosecuted, including parents with small children. But so far, U.S. border agents had not begun separating parents from their children to put the plan into action, and Miller, the architect of the administration's crackdown on undocumented immigrants, was furious about the delay.
Those invited included Sessions, Nielsen, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar and newly installed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, according to documents obtained by NBC News.
Nielsen told those at the meeting that there were simply not enough resources at DHS, nor at the other agencies that would be involved, to be able to separate parents, prosecute them for crossing the border and return them to their children in a timely manner, according to the two officials who were present. Without a swift process, the children would enter into the custody of Health and Human Services, which was already operating at near capacity.
Two officials involved in the planning of "zero tolerance" said the Justice Department acknowledged on multiple occasions that U.S. attorneys would not be able to prosecute all parents expeditiously, so sending children to HHS was the most likely outcome.
As Nielsen had said repeatedly to other officials in the weeks leading up to the meeting, according to two former officials, the process could get messy and children could get lost in an already clogged system.
Miller saw the separation of families not as an unfortunate byproduct but as a tool to deter more immigration. According to three former officials, he had devised plans that would have separated even more children. Miller, with the support of Sessions, advocated for separating all immigrant families, even those going through civil court proceedings, the former officials said.
While zero tolerance ultimately separated nearly 3,000 children from their parents, what Miller proposed would have separated 25,000 more, including those who legally presented themselves at ports of entry seeking asylum, according to Customs and Border Protection data from May and June 2018.
That plan never came to fruition, in large part because DHS officials had argued it would grind the immigration process to a halt. But after Sessions' announcement that all families entering illegally would be prosecuted, the onus had fallen on DHS to act.
At the meeting, Miller accused anyone opposing zero tolerance of being a lawbreaker and un-American, according to the two officials present.
"If we don't enforce this, it is the end of our country as we know it," Miller said, according to the two officials. It was not unusual for Miller to make claims like that, but this time he was adamant that the policy move forward, regardless of arguments about resources and logistics.
No one in the meeting made the case that separating families would be inhumane or immoral, the officials said. Any moral argument about immigration "fell on deaf ears" inside the White House, one of the officials said.
"Miller was tired of hearing about logistical problems," one of the officials said. "It was just 'Let's move forward and staff will figure this out.'"
Frustrated, Miller accused Nielsen of stalling and demanded a show of hands. Who was in favor of moving forward? he asked.
A sea of hands went up. Nielsen kept hers down. It was clear she had been outvoted, according to the officials.
In the days immediately following the meeting, Nielsen had a conversation with Kevin McAleenan, then the Customs and Border Patrol commissioner, in her office at the Ronald Reagan Building and then signed a memo instructing DHS personnel to prosecute all migrants crossing the border illegally, including parents arriving with their children.
Nielsen did so despite her stated reservations in the Situation Room and her having been warned in a legal memo by DHS General Counsel John Mitnick — which was also sent to her chief of staff at the time, Chad Wolf, who is now the acting secretary of DHS — that the decision would result in separation of families. Of the practice, Mitnick wrote, "a court could conclude that the separations are violative of the INA, Administrative Procedure Act, or the Fifth Amendment Due Process clause."
Less than two months later, Trump signed an executive order halting family separations and a federal judge in California ordered family reunifications on the grounds that the separated families' due process rights were violated.
At the time, no plan was in place to track the children who had been separated or to create a system to reunite thousands of separated families, according to the two former officials.
According to an invitation list obtained by NBC News, those expected to be in attendance at the meeting included: Sessions, Nielsen, Miller, Pompeo, Azar, Undersecretary of Defense John Rood, then-White House chief of staff John Kelly, White House deputy chief of staff Chris Liddell, then-White House counsel Don McGahn and Marc Short, who was then director of legislative affairs and is now chief of staff to Vice President Mike Pence.
Asked about the show-of-hands vote, Judd Deere, a White House spokesman, said, "This is absolutely not true and did not happen."
In response to a request for a comment about the meeting and the show of hands, HHS spokesman Michael Caputo said, "This never happened."
The State Department and DHS referred NBC News to the White House. Sessions, Nielsen, Kelly and Bolton did not respond to requests for comment. McGahn and Rood could not be reached for comment.
Before Trump ended zero tolerance by executive order on June 20, 2018, over 2,800 children had been separated from their parents. When a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to begin reuniting the families it had separated, it became clear that there was no method to track both parent and child as they moved through the system. As a result, some took months to reunite, and, in hundreds of cases, parents were deported from the U.S. without their children.
On May 4, Gary Tomasulo, who was then the senior director for border and transportation security on the National Security Council, sent an email to the deputies and lower-level staffers tasked with carrying out immigration policy, telling them that their bosses had agreed to the new zero tolerance prosecution and separation policy and that they needed to develop plans to support it.
At the time, some of the subordinates to the Cabinet secretaries who were responsible for carrying out zero tolerance had raised moral objections, according to a source familiar with the discussions.
In the email, obtained by NBC News, Tomasulo told the deputies and other subordinates that their bosses "acknowledged that there are no easy solutions, but remained committed to collectively do everything possible to develop innovative solutions that leverage the full resources, capabilities, and authorities of the U.S. government."
He went on to say, "I ask that if you are unable to participate in these meetings, the message of commitment and resolve expressed by our principals is communicated and internalized by those that represent your departments and agencies."
This is actually what pisses me off about the Dems, how they're so oblivious of the low-hanging but incredibly popular fruit just waiting to be picked that would increase their election chances greatly. Really, all the Dem platform should be comes down to two things:
1) reverse in any way possible EVERY single thing Trump has done
2) launch a full presidential commission into the activities of every single Trump appointee, the Trump family, and Trump himself, with a promise to prosecute them all to the maximum
Said it before, I'll say it again - getting rid of Trump is the only priority in this election. Smashing his wretched legacy to bits, and then doing whatever is needed to make sure it never happens again, is the second necessity. Everything else can wait.
The windows of the White House and the Secretarial offices are going to have to be left wide open for a long, long time to fully disperse the stench the current occupants are embedding into the walls and carpets. Full fumigation STAT!
It's too bad that there's no natural justice that occurs to make sure that people get the death they deserve because Stephen Miller deserves to depart this mortal coil someday by having a length of piano wire wrapped around his throat and twisted so tight that his eyeballs pop out of his skull. He's the kind of person who would personally conduct another Wannsee Conference and not think twice about it.
I’ve called Stephen Miller young Eichmann for a while now and I stand by it. He is the kind of guy who gets off dreaming of genocide of the undesirables. Every last member of the Trump administration is going to either have to go to jail or have their head mounted on a like along the National Mall as examples of what happens to people like that.
After the Third Servile War and the defeat of Spartacus and his rebellious slaves, the Romans crucified the survivors and had them strung up along the Appian Way as an unequivocal statement: this is the price you pay when you go too far.
If Biden wins and Trump goes away they have a bigger problem coming up in 2024 anyway. The most likely candidate in my mind who'll step forward for the GOP will be Tom Cotton. He won't introduce anything attractive in terms of policy - the Republicans don't do "policy" any more anyway, unless you count increasing the flow of money from the poorest to the richest as some sort of a platform. The concern with Cotton is that he's basically an advocate of sending the serving military out into the streets to shoot other non-GOP Americans. In the parlance of Dungeons & Dragons, exchanging Trump for Cotton is basically getting rid of the chaotic evil candidate for a lawful evil one, and lawful evil is about a thousand times more dangerous than it's chaotic brethren. There wouldn't be an endless display of orgiastic fuckery under Cotton the way there's been under Trump. The dismantling of American foundations would proceed in a much more organized manner.
What Trump's done can conceivably be reversed. Under a much more thoughtful, deliberate, and diligent destroyer though, which is exactly what someone like Tom Cotton would be IMO? Shit, it wouldn't be similar to what the Third Reich had, it'd be much more like the comprehensive system of obliteration Stalin created. There is every valid reason to believe that the worst has yet to come.
People are kidding themselves if they’re thinking that horrible things can’t happen because the “good people” will refuse to cooperate with immoral orders. Most of them will fall in line one way or another.