news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Best way to fight climate change' Plant a trill

Canadian Content
20700news upnews down

Best way to fight climate change' Plant a trillion trees


Environmental | 206997 hits | Jul 05 8:17 am | Posted by: Robair
28 Comment

The most effective way to fight global warming is to plant lots of trees, a trillion of them, maybe more, according to a new study. And there's enough room, Swiss scientists say.

Comments

  1. by avatar Robair
    Fri Jul 05, 2019 3:22 pm
    Reminded me of this An Acclaimed War Photographer Turns Her Lens on Canada?s Tree Planters. Some pretty cool shots in there.

  2. by avatar stratos
    Fri Jul 05, 2019 4:08 pm
    Arbor Day resurgence. I could back this with not qualms.

  3. by avatar DrCaleb
    Fri Jul 05, 2019 4:21 pm
    Plant a trillion trees and we might accidentally make the place nicer. ;)

    We could also just not cut down half a trillion trees to begin with. :lol:

  4. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Fri Jul 05, 2019 4:57 pm
    "DrCaleb" said
    Plant a trillion trees and we might accidentally make the place nicer. ;)

    We could also just not cut down half a trillion trees to begin with. :lol:
    At around 130 million new lives every year, that may be impossible.
    Think about it. Half a million years ago (give or take) we tamed fire. Yet despite all the major paradigm shifts in energy generation, 3/4 of the world still burns wood (and shit) for heat, light and cooking. Plus all the wood needed for housing.

    David Attenborough said that "nature is out of balance". But that's because the human population is out of balance. Nature used to be really good at killing us off but modern medicine has changed all that. Every year the gap increases between the birth/survival rate and the death rate leaving us with a deficit of deaths, or if you prefer, a surplus of people.
    Now obviously you need your birth/survival rate to be higher than your death rate if you want to succeed and thrive as a species. But that rate today, as previously stated, is way out of balance.

  5. by avatar BRAH
    Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:05 pm

    _________________________________

  6. by avatar DrCaleb
    Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:13 pm
    "PublicAnimalNo9" said
    Plant a trillion trees and we might accidentally make the place nicer. ;)

    We could also just not cut down half a trillion trees to begin with. :lol:
    At around 130 million new lives every year, that may be impossible.
    Think about it. Half a million years ago (give or take) we tamed fire. Yet despite all the major paradigm shifts in energy generation, 3/4 of the world still burns wood (and shit) for heat, light and cooking. Plus all the wood needed for housing.

    David Attenborough said that "nature is out of balance". But that's because the human population is out of balance. Nature used to be really good at killing us off but modern medicine has changed all that. Every year the gap increases between the birth/survival rate and the death rate leaving us with a deficit of deaths, or if you prefer, a surplus of people.
    Now obviously you need your birth/survival rate to be higher than your death rate if you want to succeed and thrive as a species. But that rate today, as previously stated, is way out of balance.

    I agree. We need a good meteor strike. ;)

  7. by avatar Robair
    Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:42 pm
    Deep down we all know Thanos is right. That's what makes him so scary.

    But in the meantime, I think I've got an idea re the employment rate...

  8. by housewife
    Sat Jul 06, 2019 4:42 pm
    "PublicAnimalNo9" said
    Plant a trillion trees and we might accidentally make the place nicer. ;)

    We could also just not cut down half a trillion trees to begin with. :lol:
    At around 130 million new lives every year, that may be impossible.
    Think about it. Half a million years ago (give or take) we tamed fire. Yet despite all the major paradigm shifts in energy generation, 3/4 of the world still burns wood (and shit) for heat, light and cooking. Plus all the wood needed for housing.

    David Attenborough said that "nature is out of balance". But that's because the human population is out of balance. Nature used to be really good at killing us off but modern medicine has changed all that. Every year the gap increases between the birth/survival rate and the death rate leaving us with a deficit of deaths, or if you prefer, a surplus of people.
    Now obviously you need your birth/survival rate to be higher than your death rate if you want to succeed and thrive as a species. But that rate today, as previously stated, is way out of balance.

    If there aren’t more breakthroughs on superbugs then there will be a balance.

  9. by avatar BRAH
    Sat Jul 06, 2019 5:20 pm

    ____________________________________

  10. by avatar BeaverFever
    Sun Jul 07, 2019 12:55 pm
    Meanwhile, in Doug Ford’s Ontario, Doug recently killed funding to the province’s 50 Million Tree Program, a program that had already planted more than 27 million trees across the province since it was founded in 2008 under the previous Liberal government and with a goal to have 50 million trees planted by 2025.

    Fortunately Trudeau threw the program a lifeline that will keep it operating for at least another 4 years with federal funding.

  11. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Mon Jul 08, 2019 5:59 am
    "BeaverFever" said
    Meanwhile, in Doug Ford’s Ontario, Doug recently killed funding to the province’s 50 Million Tree Program, a program that had already planted more than 27 million trees across the province since it was founded in 2008 under the previous Liberal government and with a goal to have 50 million trees planted by 2025.

    Fortunately Trudeau threw the program a lifeline that will keep it operating for at least another 4 years with federal funding.
    50 million trees? Hmmm, do you think that would have covered the few thousand hectares of boreal forest the Wynned Bag wanted to lop down for cattle farms?

  12. by avatar DrCaleb
    Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:44 pm
    "PublicAnimalNo9" said
    Meanwhile, in Doug Ford’s Ontario, Doug recently killed funding to the province’s 50 Million Tree Program, a program that had already planted more than 27 million trees across the province since it was founded in 2008 under the previous Liberal government and with a goal to have 50 million trees planted by 2025.

    Fortunately Trudeau threw the program a lifeline that will keep it operating for at least another 4 years with federal funding.
    50 million trees? Hmmm, do you think that would have covered the few thousand hectares of boreal forest the Wynned Bag wanted to lop down for cattle farms?

    It might replace some of the rainforest that got chopped down in Brazil last month. It won't replace the people who were living in it and were likely killed because they wouldn't cede their land to cattle farmers.

  13. by avatar DrCaleb
    Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:36 pm
    So, should we care?

    At this point, it's tempting to dismiss lumber as completely irrelevant to concerns about carbon emissions. But the authors show there are exceptions. In Canada, where timber is a major contributor to the economy, wood products end up sequestering 2.4% of its annual emissions, or over 30% of its industrial emissions. In Sweden, those numbers are 9% of the total emissions and over 70% of industrial emissions. So, when it comes to setting national emissions targets, there are countries where harvesting forests really matters.


    How much carbon does our lumber sequester?

  14. by avatar BeaverFever
    Mon Jul 08, 2019 3:56 pm
    "PublicAnimalNo9" said
    Meanwhile, in Doug Ford’s Ontario, Doug recently killed funding to the province’s 50 Million Tree Program, a program that had already planted more than 27 million trees across the province since it was founded in 2008 under the previous Liberal government and with a goal to have 50 million trees planted by 2025.

    Fortunately Trudeau threw the program a lifeline that will keep it operating for at least another 4 years with federal funding.
    50 million trees? Hmmm, do you think that would have covered the few thousand hectares of boreal forest the Wynned Bag wanted to lop down for cattle farms?

    Fake news.
    No boreal forest was cut down for cattle farms.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net