news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

866 of 45,000 ’irregular’ asylum seekers remove

Canadian Content
20745news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

866 of 45,000 ’irregular’ asylum seekers removed by CBSA since 2017


Misc CDN | 207451 hits | Jun 28 7:11 pm | Posted by: N_Fiddledog
10 Comment

OTTAWA: New federal figures shows the Canada Border Services Agency has removed fewer than 900 asylum seekers who have crossed into Canada by exploiting a loophole in asylum laws.

Comments

  1. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Sun Jun 30, 2019 3:53 am
    If the numbers are so low "because removal orders can only be enforced once an asylum seeker has exhausted all legal avenues to try to remain in the country" it may be time to streamline the system so this crap isn't happening and while they're at it they may want to throw more manpower in running these cases through so these delay are mitigated.

    Although, I wonder how may of the 44,101 other "ILLEGAL" immigrants CBSA has lost already?

  2. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Sun Jun 30, 2019 4:10 am
    "Freakinoldguy" said
    If the numbers are so low "because removal orders can only be enforced once an asylum seeker has exhausted all legal avenues to try to remain in the country" it may be time to streamline the system so this crap isn't happening and while they're at it they may want to throw more manpower in running these cases through so these delay are mitigated.


    Or we could just send border jumpers back when we catch them.

    There's a radical thought.

  3. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Sun Jun 30, 2019 7:38 am
    "N_Fiddledog" said
    If the numbers are so low "because removal orders can only be enforced once an asylum seeker has exhausted all legal avenues to try to remain in the country" it may be time to streamline the system so this crap isn't happening and while they're at it they may want to throw more manpower in running these cases through so these delay are mitigated.


    Or we could just send border jumpers back when we catch them.

    There's a radical thought.What, you mean actually enforce our border sovereignty? Why you fascist you. :lol:

  4. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:18 am
    "N_Fiddledog" said
    If the numbers are so low "because removal orders can only be enforced once an asylum seeker has exhausted all legal avenues to try to remain in the country" it may be time to streamline the system so this crap isn't happening and while they're at it they may want to throw more manpower in running these cases through so these delay are mitigated.


    Or we could just send border jumpers back when we catch them.

    There's a radical thought.

    A little late for the 44,101 Liberal Voters who are already hear isn't it?

  5. by avatar herbie
    Sun Jun 30, 2019 6:35 pm


    A little late for the 44,101 Liberal Voters who are already hear isn't it?

    Only to the most moronic Conservatives who think refugee claimants can vote.

  6. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Sun Jun 30, 2019 6:38 pm
    "Freakinoldguy" said
    If the numbers are so low "because removal orders can only be enforced once an asylum seeker has exhausted all legal avenues to try to remain in the country" it may be time to streamline the system so this crap isn't happening and while they're at it they may want to throw more manpower in running these cases through so these delay are mitigated.


    Or we could just send border jumpers back when we catch them.

    There's a radical thought.

    A little late for the 44,101 Liberal Voters who are already hear isn't it?


    The solution there may be simple too.

    If a Liberal government isn't in power they can't be opening the doors for what they hope will be future supporters.

    On the other hand I hesitate to put my hopes in Soy Boy # 2. Looking into the future I worry I might find I just endorsed more of the same if I give him my vote. I lack confidence there where will be much "streamlining the system" at the bottom end of my expectations under Scheer.

  7. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:09 pm
    "herbie" said


    A little late for the 44,101 Liberal Voters who are already hear isn't it?

    Only to the most moronic Conservatives who think refugee claimants can vote.


    Let me fix that for ya, insults.


    "A little late for the 44,101 Liberal Voters who are already here isn't it".


    Happy now?

  8. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:20 pm
    "N_Fiddledog" said


    On the other hand I hesitate to put my hopes in Soy Boy # 2. Looking into the future I worry I might find I just endorsed more of the same if I give him my vote. I lack confidence there where will be much "streamlining the system" at the bottom end of my expectations under Scheer.



    Like I said before. I'd vote for the Great Satan himself if it meant getting rid of that virtue signalling, woke, feminist joke of a divide and conquer, waterbox drinking pitiful little dictator.

    So, if the Great Satan just happens to be Scheer then so be it because, it's the price i'm willing to pay to get our country back from the worst PM in Canadian history.

  9. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Mon Jul 01, 2019 4:36 am
    Yeah...I might wind up going there too.

    I'm back and forth, right now, but the shit-pile we've got currently - not just Justin but the crowd he chose for support - does look like it will be hard to top. Maybe Scheer can't be that bad - even though he's giving all kinds of indications he wants to try.

  10. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Mon Jul 01, 2019 6:58 pm
    "N_Fiddledog" said
    Yeah...I might wind up going there too.

    I'm back and forth, right now, but the shit-pile we've got currently - not just Justin but the crowd he chose for support - does look like it will be hard to top. Maybe Scheer can't be that bad - even though he's giving all kinds of indications he wants to try.


    He's a politician which means by nature HE LIES, so I wouldn't worry to much about him keeping all his weird left wing type campaign promises. Or, any of the other ones either. :wink:

    Hell, look at waterbox boy. The only major promises he kept were marijuana, the long form census and a (sort of) non partisan senate. Otherwise he's just ad libbed his way through his term destroying lives, careers and Canadian unity while pandering completely to the natives and every other special interest group in Canada that adheres to his warped dogma.

    Canadians have learned not to expect much from their politicians and because of that we have leaders like Trudeau. So, when you think about it, just how bad can Scheer really be in comparison to what's destroying the country now?



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net