 In his words: Gerald Butts on SNC-Lavalin and Jody Wilson-RaybouldPolitical | 206946 hits | Mar 06 10:43 am | Posted by: Freakinoldguy Commentsview comments in forum You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2026 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2026 by Canadaka.net
The only thing is that we'll likely never know the truth about this whole sordid affair which is sad. Because, as the people who are paying these politicians and bureaucrats wages and who put them into power we have the right to know the truth and not be shown some gov't funded highly polished turd.
What isn't up for debate though, is when the PM didn't get his way, he 'demoted' JWR to Veterans Affairs.
I'm going to believe JWR. Butts/Trudeau both stand to benefit, JWR, to me, her testimony bore a ring of truth.
I'm not going to believe either one of them. JWR has her eye on the brass ring and Trudeau and Butts are trying to keep their UN driven globalist power wagon rolling.
As for JWR I trust her about as far as I can throw her. So, I'll wait till what part she played in the subverting of justice in the Admiral Norman case comes out and then I'll make my decision.
Yup, pretty much everything that's been said about this by both sides has been bullshit and we're likely never going to find out what really happened.
Yup, pretty much everything that's been said about this by both sides has been bullshit and we're likely never going to find out what really happened.
Odds are, yes. But I think there is one thing that is really obvious in this scandal.
The Minister of Justice and the Attorney General need to be two different people, like many other Constitutional Monarchies have.
Yup, pretty much everything that's been said about this by both sides has been bullshit and we're likely never going to find out what really happened.
Odds are, yes. But I think there is one thing that is really obvious in this scandal.
The Minister of Justice and the Attorney General need to be two different people, like many other Constitutional Monarchies have.
Exactly. It would eliminate conflicts of interest and give the appearance of impartiality for both offices.
AG should be independent all together. Have Canadians vote for the AG...
Fuck that! I want humour.
The leaving government chooses the AG for the new government.
Do you want me to bring Marshmellows or Wieners?
Yup, pretty much everything that's been said about this by both sides has been bullshit and we're likely never going to find out what really happened.
Odds are, yes. But I think there is one thing that is really obvious in this scandal.
The Minister of Justice and the Attorney General need to be two different people, like many other Constitutional Monarchies have.
Exactly. It would eliminate conflicts of interest and give the appearance of impartiality for both offices.
I agree with this as well.
AG should be independent all together. Have Canadians vote for the AG...
No way. Look at the US. That just brings in obstructionist clowns. Make it an independent 10-year appointment from the ranks of the professional public service
No way. Look at the US. That just brings in obstructionist clowns. Make it an independent 10-year appointment from the ranks of the professional public service
10 years is too long!
The speed of societal change is relative to our rate of communication. We need to adapt and change faster, not slower. We should be reducing term limits until they approach zero, which could happen as soon as the communication rate hits 100% coverage (currently at approx 70%). It is already nearly instantaneous.