news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Liberal MP says SNC-Lavalin 'entitled' to agree

Canadian Content
20701news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Liberal MP says SNC-Lavalin 'entitled' to agreement to avoid criminal trial


Political | 207012 hits | Mar 05 3:17 pm | Posted by: Freakinoldguy
9 Comment

A Liberal MP says his party believes the SNC-Lavalin is “entitled” to a deferred prosecution agreement — a legal mechanism that would allow the Quebec engineering firm to avoid criminal prosecution.

Comments

  1. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Tue Mar 05, 2019 11:23 pm
    You have got to be kidding me. The Liberals must be getting desperate to trot this clown out and have him say that because SNC Lavalin wouldn't have been prosecuted in Great Briton they shouldn't be prosecuted in Canada. :roll:

    Given that logic, it should be okay for the Canadian gov't to harvest organs from prisoners because China allows it. ROTFL

    I'm sorry but this is Canada and SNC Lavalin broke the law. So, just because certain people in the Liberal Party including Trudeau are willing to break the law for their or someone else's benefit doesn't mean that our judicial system should be circumvented by anyone.

  2. by avatar BeaverFever
    Tue Mar 05, 2019 11:34 pm
    So, just because certain people in the Liberal Party including Trudeau are willing to break the law...


    To be clear, based on what’s been revealed, they did not “break the law”

  3. by avatar PluggyRug
    Tue Mar 05, 2019 11:36 pm
    Trudeau's between the rock and the other thing. If he gives SNC deferred prosecution he gets the Quebec vote, and loses votes in the ROC, or he loses Quebec.

  4. by avatar Coach85
    Tue Mar 05, 2019 11:36 pm
    "BeaverFever" said
    So, just because certain people in the Liberal Party including Trudeau are willing to break the law...


    To be clear, based on what’s been revealed, they did not “break the law”


    That has yet to be determined.

  5. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Tue Mar 05, 2019 11:48 pm
    "BeaverFever" said
    So, just because certain people in the Liberal Party including Trudeau are willing to break the law...


    To be clear, based on what’s been revealed, they did not “break the law”

    Attempting to obstruct justice isn't against the law? So I guess if I "attempt to kill you" that's not against the law? Are we now basing the law on whether or not you were successful in breaking it?

  6. by avatar BeaverFever
    Tue Mar 05, 2019 11:52 pm
    "Coach85" said
    So, just because certain people in the Liberal Party including Trudeau are willing to break the law...


    To be clear, based on what’s been revealed, they did not “break the law”


    That has yet to be determined.

    I would say there’s a long way to go before people can jump to that conclusion. Even JWR said they didn’t break the law.

  7. by avatar PluggyRug
    Tue Mar 05, 2019 11:56 pm
    Liberals breaking the law? I'm shocked I tell you

  8. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Wed Mar 06, 2019 12:09 am
    "BeaverFever" said
    So, just because certain people in the Liberal Party including Trudeau are willing to break the law...


    To be clear, based on what’s been revealed, they did not “break the law”


    Maybe, maybe not. What's been revealed so far is apparently enough for Andrew Scheer and the Conservatives lawyers to disagree with your and the PM's assessment of what constitutes a crime.

    Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer called on the RCMP to start investigating and said in an open letter Thursday that he believes the pressure Wilson-Raybould described represents a “gross violation of the law.” He pointed to two sections of the Criminal Code that he believes may have been broken: one that prohibits conduct meant to provoke fear in the attorney general, and another that says it’s against the law to try to obstruct justice.


    https://www.thestar.com/politics/federa ... e-law.html

    So we'll have to wait and see what any RCMP investigation reveals because this scandal isn't going away anytime soon. Besides, it's likely the Conservatives will get their way especially since the PM is in no position to legally or illegally block any RCMP investigations because if he did it'd be like a giant billboard proclaiming his and his offices guilt.

  9. by avatar llama66
    Wed Mar 06, 2019 2:09 pm
    Liberal MP "entitled" to suck my nuts. No entity is above the law.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net