CNN sues Trump over Jim Acosta's credential suspensionUncle Sam | 206929 hits | Nov 13 10:20 am | Posted by: N_Fiddledog  Jim Acosta had his White House access revoked hours after a confrontation with the president.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
"Wah."
Then sit back down with a smug, proggy smirk on my face.
CNN and the courts have exactly not one right to tell the White House who they can or cannot admit to the grounds. Not even the US Supreme Court has the right to order Jim Acost-her back into the White Hut.
Not true there’s precedent. Lyndon Johnson revoked a conservative reporter’s press pass and the courts eventually ruled in the reporter’s favour:
“Once the government creates the kind of forum that it has created, like the White House briefing room, it can’t selectively include or exclude people on the basis of ideology or viewpoint,” said Ben Wizner, the director of the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project.
The new steps enunciated in the Sherrill decision to ensure that reporters’ First Amendment rights are not violated include the requirement to give the reporter notice and the right to rebut a formal written decision, which must accompany any revocation. “We further conclude that notice, opportunity to rebut, and a written decision are required because the denial of a pass potentially infringes upon First Amendment guarantees,” the court’s ruling states. “Such impairment of this interest cannot be permitted to occur in the absence of adequate procedural due process.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... ss/575479/
If I was the defense attorney and it came time to present the case of the defense I would stand adjusting my tie, nod to the judge, turn to the jury and utter one word.
"Wah."
Then sit back down with a smug, proggy smirk on my face.
You mean like you do here?
If I was the defense attorney and it came time to present the case of the defense I would stand adjusting my tie, nod to the judge, turn to the jury and utter one word.
"Wah."
Then sit back down with a smug, proggy smirk on my face.
You mean like you do here?
Why? We're you wanting me to use longer sentences? I don't know Fifer. I don't think you're ready for it.
Or are you seeing me with a smug, proggy smirk-face every time I pin your ears back.
To be honest It's me who's not quite ready for that pose yet. Not proggy enough, I guess. I'm working on it though. I have some models.
So it's still just an argument. We're still just waiting for an opinion then.
Personally, my opinion is that CNN is crybullying for a crybaby who liked to disrupt press meetings and went "Wah" when he was told he couldn't do it anymore. Hope they lose.
If I was the defense attorney and it came time to present the case of the defense I would stand adjusting my tie, nod to the judge, turn to the jury and utter one word.
"Wah."
Then sit back down with a smug, proggy smirk on my face.
You mean like you do here?
Why? We're you wanting me to use longer sentences? I don't know Fifer. I don't think you're ready for it.
Or are you seeing me with a smug, proggy smirk-face every time I pin your ears back.
To be honest It's me who's not quite ready for that pose yet. Not proggy enough, I guess. I'm working on it though. I have some models.
Ooohhh... got me there, you would never look proggy!
____________
Fake News!