Conservative suppression on campus turns parents away from collegeslifestyle | 208237 hits | Jul 14 7:54 am | Posted by: N_Fiddledog  An admissions letter from Harvard University was once considered cause for celebration, but in conservative households, that may be changing.Commentsview comments in forum You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
Who voted on this?
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
Looks like it may be starting to have an affect.
What exactly is 'conservative thought'?
Sounds like the thought process is to convince uneducated masses that staying uneducated is in best interest...
What exactly is 'conservative thought'?
It's easier to simply say that any thought that doesn't comport with the rigid social justice warrior dogma is prohibited on campus.
I say that because just recently it was some radical leftist who was targeted on a campus for going against the SJW tyranny.
It's also noted that a whole host of liberal comedians won't do college appearances anymore because they're fed up with idiots disrupting their routines because they're protesting about animal rights or else they're offended at something the comedian said.
Do you guys know what The College Fix is?
Check it out?
https://www.thecollegefix.com/
Now if you scanned through those headlines and went WTF
If you simply shrugged - as in what's the big deal - then you don't get it. You never will get it.
So send your kids to Prog-Comm college and the rest of us will look for alternatives for our kids and hire from the college or university most likely to produce a winner, and you can have your kids graduate 'women's studies' or 'Postmodern anti-zionism' 'advanced rioting' 'how to stifle speech', or 'infinity genderology' or whatever the Communists in charge are telling you is knowledge this week.
Let's see who comes out on top in the long run.
The elders at Harvard University are wagging a finger at the “pernicious behavior” of some of its students and are proposing a ban on all fraternities and sororities on the elite campus.
The no-fun proposal was dropped Wednesday morning by a faculty committee tasked with changing the school’s policy on single-gender social groups.
In a 22-page report, the committee recommended single gender clubs be banned by the fall of 2018 and even wrote out the wording of what Harvard should tell its undergraduates:
“Harvard students may neither join nor participate in final clubs, fraternities or sororities, or other similar private, exclusionary social organizations that are exclusively or predominantly made up of Harvard students, whether they have any local or national affiliation, during their time in the College. The College will take disciplinary action against students who are found to be participating in such organizations.”
http://vesselnews.io/2017/07/harvard-wa ... ororities/
So after they ban traditional knowledge and society from these Progressive cesspits of re-imagined, useless, faux knowledge and far left authoritarianism, fewer and fewer will apply. Who's going to pay for them?
N
“Harvard students may neither join nor participate in final clubs, fraternities or sororities, or other similar private, exclusionary social organizations that are exclusively or predominantly made up of Harvard students, whether they have any local or national affiliation, during their time in the College. The College will take disciplinary action against students who are found to be participating in such organizations.”
Blatant First Amendment violations.
Ironically, it'll likely be graduates of Harvard Law School who sue to overturn this, who defend it, and who sit on the court that rules against it.
“Harvard students may neither join nor participate in final clubs, fraternities or sororities, or other similar private, exclusionary social organizations that are exclusively or predominantly made up of Harvard students, whether they have any local or national affiliation, during their time in the College. The College will take disciplinary action against students who are found to be participating in such organizations.”
Blatant First Amendment violations.
Ironically, it'll likely be graduates of Harvard Law School who sue to overturn this, who defend it, and who sit on the court that rules against it.
Is Harvard part of the government?
Is Harvard part of the government?
Bart's still trying to wrap his head around the laws of his own Nation.
Is Harvard part of the government?
Many graduates of Harvard's Law School are and have been...such as Barack Obama.
Bart's still trying to wrap his head around the laws of his own Nation.
I'm not alone and unlike yourself I'm aware of what I do not know.
http://www.kowal.com/?q=How-Many-Federa ... e-There%3F
February 7, 2013
No one knows how many laws there are in the United States. Apparently, no one can count that high.
They’ve been accumulating, of course, for more than 200 years. When federal laws were first codified in 1927, they fit into a single volume. By the 1980s, there were 50 volumes of more than 23,000 pages.
And today? Online sources say that no one knows. The Internal Revenue Code alone, first codified in 1874, contains more than 3.4 million words and, if printed 60 lines to the page, is more than 7,500 pages long. There are about 20,000 laws just governing the use and ownership of guns.
New laws mean new crimes. From the start of 2000 through 2007, Congress had created at least 452 new crimes, so that at that time the total number of Federal crimes exceeded 4,450.
Of course, times change and laws need to be updated. But many laws detract from, rather than contribute to, our quality of life and overall well-being. It is impossible for anyone to know all of the laws that affect them and it is, therefore, impossible to not break any laws. How many of the 4,450 crimes have you broken?
The role of Congress, unfortunately, is to create new laws, not to do away with old laws that don’t work. Members of Congress running for re-election want to be able to say that they sponsored and passed new laws – regardless of how harmful the laws may be.
In a typical year, Congress passes at least 125 new laws, but Congress has fortunately slowed the pace of late. In 2011, after Republicans took control of the U.S. House of Representatives, Congress passed just 90 bills into law. As of last August, only 61 of the 3,914 bills that had been introduced in 2012 as of that date had been passed into law.
USA Today criticized the “do nothing” Congress for not passing enough new laws, as though Congress should be graded based on the number of laws it passes. I say it’s a step in the right direction.
Is Harvard part of the government?
Many graduates of Harvard's Law School are and have been...such as Barack Obama.
That's not the question. There is no amendment violation if the government isn't enforcing it.
What exactly is 'conservative thought'?
An oxymoron?
OK, OK... I'll go away now.