http://www.skepticalscience.com/what-is ... power.htmlThis is a useful article on Wind Power and the embedded links answer some criticisms.
Further, Wind Power has already reached grid parity (cost) with coal and is close to other sources. It is cheaper than new coal or nuclear would be.
When considering the subsidies it should be born in mind that fossil fuel subsidies world wide amount to some $550 billion annually now and that they only achieved their position with even greater subsides in the past.
The subsidies talked of for wind and solar are direct subsidies while those for traditional sources are now indirect in large part. The health costs of fossil sources are also a huge drain on economies everywhere.
The storage problems with both wind and solar are not the killer they are made out to be. The technologies are improving rapidly. Pumped storage has now achieved capacities of over three Megawatts and will go higher. Note in this article the use of car batteries. One car battery can power up to ten homes.
Interconnectedness of grids will enable WP and solar from thousands of miles away to be exchanged for where the wind is not blowing or the sun shining.
In some countries wind is already producing up to 20% of requirements. I recall a British government assessment of offshore potential that concluded that the total potential was for eight times the total British electricity requirement and that, under the then technology, it could provide for around 50% consistently (it was several years ago).
Coal and oil have already lost and maintain dominance only because of the power of the industries.