CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:48 pm
 


Title: Quebec to get 3 more MPs in new distribution
Category: Political
Posted By: Hyack
Date: 2011-10-26 22:57:00
Canadian


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7684
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:48 pm
 


I'd be a little miffed on this issue if things went the NDP's way.

Good.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 53403
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:01 pm
 


$1:
The party's platform guarantees Quebec won't drop below 75 seats.


Now, that's partisan hackery.

Constitution of Canada Constitution of Canada:
37. The House of Commons shall, subject to the Provisions of this Act, consist of two hundred and ninety-five members of whom ninety-nine shall be elected for Ontario, seventy-five for Quebec, eleven for Nova Scotia, ten for New Brunswick, fourteen for Manitoba, thirty-two for British Columbia, four for Prince Edward Island, twenty-six for Alberta, fourteen for Saskatchewan, seven for Newfoundland, one for the Yukon Territory and two for the Northwest Territories.(20)


http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-3.html

I'm glad party policy does not trump the Constitution. :roll:


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6584
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:02 pm
 


$1:
July Statistics Canada numbers show Quebec had a population of 7,979,663, or 23.1 per cent of the country's population.

Under the new distribution, the province would have 23.1 per cent of the seats in the House of Commons.


So he gives us some seats instead of nothing so that we are now the exact number of seats in proportion of the population and the west and Ontario gets mostly the same then expected. That's a win-win solution politically for Harper.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11825
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:21 pm
 


You mean he sucked up and screwed BC a little, Ontario a lot to curry favour in Quebec and Alberta.
Just like all the rest of the bums, no different.
Sucked up to Quebec, and he had the opportunity to fix things a just little. Nice play to buy off the Homeland by giving them more seats than they expected.
Win-win in typical slimeball politician speak perhaps.


Offline
Forum Junkie
Forum Junkie
 Calgary Flames
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 618
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:23 pm
 


DrCaleb DrCaleb:
I'm glad party policy does not trump the Constitution. :roll:


a·mend   [uh-mend] Show IPA
verb (used with object)
1.
to alter, modify, rephrase, or add to or subtract from (a motion, bill, constitution, etc.) by formal procedure: Congress may amend the proposed tax bill.

Seems like pretty fair distribution of representation to me.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ca ... population


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11825
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:36 am
 


It seems pretty fair if you're going to lay the damned case that Quebec is entitled to a guaranteed portion of the House and to hell with representation by population. Something that was REJECTED by Canadians with the Charlottetown Accord.
The only gaurantee since Day One is that PEI gets no less than FOUR seats.
BC was promised 7 new seats
Alberta 5
and Ontario 18
to bring the representation by population CLOSER to what Quebec already had.
Quebec deserved fuck all. This is sheer political pandering.
Ontario's used to appeasing Quebec at it's own expense, Alberta's been bought off with an extra seat and the same shit goes on. OF course the Harperites will swear it's different because Harper's doing it instead of Trudeau or Mulroney.
Reform Party oldtimers should be turning in their graves with the shit going on (this and same old Senate stacking) but they get to see bad guys go to jail so to hell with democratic reform/


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
Profile
Posts: 1244
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:16 am
 


Actually, Quebec's share keeps it very close to its proportion of the population. Just as it should be.

My personal view is that Quebec should have been given more to keep it around 25%. Particularly with the declining role of the Senate, Quebec needs that "Regional" protection that the Senate (before Harper) used to provide.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:48 am
 


herbie herbie:
It seems pretty fair if you're going to lay the damned case that Quebec is entitled to a guaranteed portion of the House and to hell with representation by population. Something that was REJECTED by Canadians with the Charlottetown Accord.
The only gaurantee since Day One is that PEI gets no less than FOUR seats.
BC was promised 7 new seats
Alberta 5
and Ontario 18
to bring the representation by population CLOSER to what Quebec already had.
Quebec deserved fuck all. This is sheer political pandering.
Ontario's used to appeasing Quebec at it's own expense, Alberta's been bought off with an extra seat and the same shit goes on. OF course the Harperites will swear it's different because Harper's doing it instead of Trudeau or Mulroney.
Reform Party oldtimers should be turning in their graves with the shit going on (this and same old Senate stacking) but they get to see bad guys go to jail so to hell with democratic reform/


R=UP I'd rep if I could!


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.